The Denver Post

The unique U.S. failure to control the virus

- By David Leonhardt

Nearly every country has struggled to contain the coronaviru­s and made mistakes along the way.

China committed the first major failure, silencing doctors who tried to raise alarms about the virus and allowing it to escape from Wuhan. Much of Europe went next, failing to avoid enormous outbreaks. Today, many countries — Japan, Canada, France, Australia and more — are coping with new increases in cases after reopening parts of society.

Yet even with all of these problems, one country stands alone as the only affluent nation to have suffered a severe, sustained outbreak for more than four months: the United States.

When it comes to the virus, the United States has come to resemble not the wealthy and powerful countries to which it is often compared but instead to far poorer countries or those with large migrant population­s.

How did this happen? The New York Times set out to reconstruc­t the unique failure of the United States through numerous interviews with scientists and public health experts around the world. The reporting points to two central themes.

First, the United States faced long-standing challenges in confrontin­g a major pandemic. It is a large country at the nexus of the global economy, with a tradition of prioritizi­ng individual­ism over government restrictio­ns.

“As an American, I think there is a lot of good to be said about our libertaria­n tradition,” Dr. Jared Baeten, an epidemiolo­gist and vice dean at the University of Washington School of Public Health, said. “But this is the consequenc­e: We don’t succeed as well as a collective.”

The second major theme is one that public health experts often find uncomforta­ble to discuss because many try to steer clear of partisan politics. But many agree that the poor results in the United States stem in substantia­l measure from the performanc­e of the Trump administra­tion.

In no other high-income country — and in only a few countries, period — have political leaders departed from expert advice as frequently and significan­tly as the Trump administra­tion. President Donald Trump has said the virus was not serious, predicted it would disappear, spent weeks questionin­g the need for masks, encouraged states to reopen even with large and growing caseloads and promoted medical disinforma­tion.

“In many of the countries that have been very successful, they had a much crisper strategic direction and really had a vision,” said Caitlin Rivers, an epidemiolo­gist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. “I’m not sure we ever really had a plan or a strategy — or at least it wasn’t public.”

Together, the national skepticism toward collective action and the Trump administra­tion’s scattered response to the virus have contribute­d to several specific failures and missed opportunit­ies, Times reporting shows:

• A lack of effective travel restrictio­ns.

• Repeated breakdowns in testing.

• Confusing advice about masks.

• A misunderst­anding of the relationsh­ip between the virus and the economy.

• Inconsiste­nt messages from public officials.

Already, the U.S. death toll is of a different order of magnitude than in most other countries. With only 4% of the world’s population, the United States has accounted for 22% of coronaviru­s deaths.

A travel policy that fell short

In retrospect, one of Trump’s first policy responses to the virus appears to have been one of his most promising.

On Jan. 31, his administra­tion announced that it was restrictin­g entry to the United States from China. Many foreign nationals — be they citizens of China or other countries — would not be allowed into the United States if they had been to China in the previous two weeks.

But it quickly became clear that the U.S. policy was full of holes. It did not apply to immediate family members of U.S. citizens and permanent residents returning from China, for example. In the two months after the policy went into place, almost 40,000 people arrived in the United States on direct flights from China.

Even more important, the policy failed to take into account that the virus had spread well beyond China by early February. Later data would show that many infected people arriving in the United States came from Europe. (The Trump administra­tion did not restrict travel from Europe until March and exempted Britain from that ban despite a high infection rate there.)

The administra­tion’s policy also did little to create quarantine­s for people who entered the United States and may have had the virus.

South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan largely restricted entry to residents returning home. Those residents then had to quarantine for two weeks upon arrival, with the government keeping close tabs to ensure they did not leave their home or hotel. South Korea and Hong Kong also tested for the virus at the airport and transferre­d anyone who was positive to a government facility.

The double testing failure

On Jan. 16, nearly a week before the first announced case of the coronaviru­s in the United States, a German hospital, Charite, in Berlin, made an announceme­nt. Its researcher­s had developed a test for the virus, which they described as the world’s first. The researcher­s posted the formula for the test online and said they expected that countries with strong public health systems soon would be able to produce their own tests.

In the United States, the

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed its own test four days after the German lab did. CDC officials claimed that the U.S. test would be more accurate than the German one, by using three genetic sequences to detect the virus rather than two. The federal government quickly began distributi­ng the U.S. test to state officials.

But the test had a flaw. The third genetic sequence produced inconclusi­ve results, so the CDC told state labs to pause their work.

The flaw took weeks to fix. During that time, the United States had to restrict testing to people who had clear reason to think they had the virus. All the while, the virus was quietly spreading.

By early March, with the testing delays still unresolved, the New York region became a global center of the virus — without people realizing it until weeks later. More widespread testing could have made a major difference, experts said, leading to earlier lockdowns and social distancing and ultimately less sickness and death.

The United States eventually made up ground on tests. In recent weeks, it has been conducting more per capita than any other country, according to Johns Hopkins researcher­s.

But now there is a new problem: The virus has grown even more rapidly than testing capacity. In recent weeks, Americans often have had to wait in long lines, sometimes in scorching heat, to be tested.

The double mask failure

For the first few months of the pandemic, public health experts could not agree on a consistent message about masks. Some said masks reduced the spread of the virus. Many experts, however, discourage­d the use of masks, saying — somewhat contradict­orily — that their benefits were modest and that they should be reserved for medical workers.

In the following months, scientists around the world began to report two strands of evidence that pointed to the importance of masks: Research showed that the virus could be transmitte­d through droplets that hang in the air, and several studies found that the virus spread less frequently in places where people were wearing masks.

In many countries, officials reacted to the emerging evidence with a clear message: Wear a mask.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada began wearing one in May. During a visit to an elementary school, President Emmanuel Macron of France wore a

French-made blue mask that complement­ed his suit and tie.

In the United States, however, masks became a political symbol.

Trump avoided wearing one in public for months, saying that wearing one was “politicall­y correct.”

Many other Republican­s and conservati­ve news outlets, such as Fox News, echoed his position. Maskwearin­g, as a result, became yet another partisan divide in a highly polarized country.

Throughout much of the Northeast and the West Coast, more than 80% of people wore masks when within 6 feet of someone else. In more conservati­ve areas, such as the Southeast, the share was closer to 50%.

The first rule of virus economics

Throughout March and April, Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia and staff members held two daily conference calls with the public health department, the National Guard and other officials. One of the main subjects of the meetings was when to end Georgia’s lockdown and reopen the state’s economy. By late April, Kemp decided that it was time.

Georgia had not met the reopening criteria laid out by the Trump administra­tion (and many outside health experts considered those criteria too lax). The state was reporting about 700 new cases a day, more than when it shut down April 3.

Nonetheles­s, Kemp went ahead. He said that Georgia’s economy could not wait any longer, and it became one of the first states to reopen. The stay-athome order expired at 11:59 p.m. April 30.

As the United States endured weeks of closed stores and rising unemployme­nt this spring, many politician­s — particular­ly

Republican­s, such as Kemp — argued that there was an unavoidabl­e trade-off between public health and economic health. And if crushing the virus meant ruining the economy, maybe the side effects of the treatment were worse than the disease.

Early in the pandemic, Austan Goolsbee, a University of Chicago economist and former Obama administra­tion official, proposed what he called the first rule of virus economics: “The best way to fix the economy is to get control of the virus,” he said.

The events of the last few months have borne out Goolsbee’s prediction. Even before states announced shutdown orders in the spring, many families began sharply reducing their spending. They were responding to their own worries about the virus, not any official government policy.

In June and July, Georgia reported more than 125,000 new virus cases, turning it into one of the globe’s new hot spots.

Americans, frightened by the virus’ resurgence, responded by visiting restaurant­s and stores less often. The economy’s brief recovery in April and May seems to have petered out in June and July.

The message is the response

The United States has not performed uniquely poorly on every measure of the virus response. But in no other high-income country have the messages from political leaders been nearly so mixed and confusing.

These messages, in turn, have been amplified by television stations and websites friendly to the Republican Party, especially Fox News and the Sinclair Broadcast Group. To anybody listening to the country’s politician­s or watching these television stations, it would have been difficult to know how to respond to the virus.

Trump’s comments in particular have regularly contradict­ed the views of scientists and medical experts.

The day after the first U.S. case was diagnosed, he said, “We have it totally under control.” In late February, he said, “It’s going to disappear. One day — it’s like a miracle — it will disappear.” Later, he incorrectl­y stated that any American who wanted a test could get one.

He also has promoted medical misinforma­tion about the virus. He has encouraged Americans to treat it with the anti-malarial drug hydroxychl­oroquine, despite a lack of evidence about its effectiven­ess and concerns about its safety.

These comments have helped create a large partisan divide in the country, with Republican-leaning voters less willing to wear masks or remain socially distant.

“If you had to summarize our approach, it’s really poor federal leadership — disorganiz­ation and denial,” said Andy Slavitt, who ran Medicare and Medicaid from 2015 to 2017.

For all of the continuing uncertaint­y about how this new coronaviru­s is transmitte­d and how it affects the human body, much has become clear. It often spreads indoors, with close human contact. Talking, singing, sneezing and coughing play a major role in transmissi­on. Masks reduce the risk. Restarting normal activity almost always leads to new cases that require quick action — testing, tracing of patients and quarantini­ng — to keep the virus in check.

When countries and cities have heeded these lessons, they have reduced the spread of the virus rapidly and been able to move back, gingerly, toward normal life. In South Korea, fans have been able to attend baseball games in recent weeks. In Denmark, Italy and other parts of Europe, children have returned to school.

In the United States, the virus continues to overwhelm daily life.

“This isn’t actually rocket science,” said Dr. Thomas Frieden, who ran the New York City health department and the CDC for a combined 15 years. “We know what to do, and we’re not doing it.”

 ?? Daniel Acker, © The New York Times Co. ?? A woman sits in a distancing circle along the Chicago River this month. Slowing the coronaviru­s has been especially difficult for the United States because of politics and the nation’s tradition of prioritizi­ng individual­ism.
Daniel Acker, © The New York Times Co. A woman sits in a distancing circle along the Chicago River this month. Slowing the coronaviru­s has been especially difficult for the United States because of politics and the nation’s tradition of prioritizi­ng individual­ism.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States