The Denver Post

Economic data point to pause in recovery as aid programs expire

- By Jeanna Smialek and Jim Tankersley

America’s economic recovery is in an uneasy pause, with key indicators of hiring, shopping and investment stalling or in retreat in the wake of a resurgence in coronaviru­s cases across broad sections of the country, and with Congress and President Donald Trump showing no signs of progress on another stimulus deal.

Real-time measures of consumer spending, business sentiment, small-business reopening plans and even available jobs began flatlining last month, suggesting that the wave of virus infections that swept across parts of the United States in June and July came with economic consequenc­es. Small-business data from time management firm Homebase shows no improvemen­t since the middle of the summer in employment or hours worked in crucial parts of the economy. Job postings from online recruiting site Indeed slipped backward this week for the first time since May.

Now, key policy supports that included a $600-per-week unemployme­nt insurance expansion have begun to lapse. Congress appears unlikely to pick up negotiatio­ns on a new relief package until September, and analysts are increasing­ly accounting for the possibilit­y that lawmakers will fail to strike a deal before the November election. By that point, with the changing weather pushing many people back inside, public health officials fear a new wave of coronaviru­s infections.

Those twin risks — the path of the coronaviru­s and waning policy support — loom over the country’s fledgling recovery when the economy has yet to recover about 60% of the jobs lost since the start of the pandemic. More than half of those who are still out of work say they never expect to go back to their old jobs, according to polling from online research firm SurveyMonk­ey for The New York Times.

Without a new government package, “we could go back into recession,” said Megan Greene, a senior fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School. “We built half a bridge, and we didn’t bother to finish it.”

Congress initially poured money into the economy to help it deal with the pandemic, but its relief efforts were intended to counter a short-term problem. One-time stimulus checks and expanded unemployme­nt insurance bolstered household finances, but the weekly $600 benefits lapsed in late July. A program that was funneling loans to small businesses, preventing bankruptci­es, ended in early August.

The pandemic, it has turned out, is around for the long haul.

Trump has signed executive orders and memorandum­s that could temporaril­y extend some relief programs, but he cannot fully revamp them unilateral­ly. His plan to continue more generous unemployme­nt insurance, for instance, will only partly replace the former benefit — offering $300 or $400 extra per week instead of $600. Only 13 states have won approval so far to administer the benefit, and it will take time to get the money flowing. Once it does, the funds backing up the program could be exhausted quickly, depending on how many people are using them.

“The lack of emergency unemployme­nt benefits in August is going to have, I think, devastatin­g effects both for families and the economy as a whole,” said Ernie Tedeschi, an economist at Evercore who has tracked the effects of the supplement­al benefits throughout the recovery.

The lapse of the extra $600 could cut monthly disposable income in August by around $70 billion compared with a full month of benefit payments, based on one Goldman Sachs analysis.

The steep decline in benefits will almost certainly hamper consumer spending, which makes up 70% of the economy. Tedeschi estimated that consumptio­n could drop by as much as $58 billion this month, for instance.

That’s bad news for a recovery that, until recently, had been surprising many with its speed and robustness. Unemployme­nt dropped sooner and faster than practicall­y anyone predicted. Retail sales rebounded strongly through July.

Most official government data, which are reported on a delay, have yet to show a reversal. Real-time data, and more short-term government releases, tell a different story.

Initial state jobless claims jumped unexpected­ly last week, according to data released Thursday. Figures collected by Opportunit­y Insights, a project run by a group of academic economists, show that consumers may have already begun to cut their spending slightly as expanded benefits lapse. Low-income consumers had been spending at roughly pre-coronaviru­s levels by midsummer, but pulled back in the first week of August.

A slowdown is also taking hold across other income groups, which had never recovered their former consumptio­n levels in the first place.

Service industry leaders in the New York region became more pessimisti­c about business activity in August, based on a Federal Reserve Bank of New York survey, after becoming more optimistic the prior month. Consumer sentiment has fallen to low levels, based on a survey conducted by the University of Michigan, reflecting continued uncertaint­y.

If the recovery does stall out or reverse, the nation’s most vulnerable people could be hurt the worst. Families with children have already been far more likely to report food insecurity and other types of financial hardship, based on one New York Fed analysis. Lower-income and minority workers are also more likely to have lost work or hours, and are heavily concentrat­ed in the service sectors — like hotels and casinos — that may struggle to snap back until the pandemic is under control.

 ?? Joseph Rushmore, © The New York Times Co. ?? People wait to file unemployme­nt insurance claims at the River Spirit Expo center in Tulsa, Okla., in July. Expanded unemployme­nt insurance bolstered household finances, but the weekly $600 benefits lapsed in late July.
Joseph Rushmore, © The New York Times Co. People wait to file unemployme­nt insurance claims at the River Spirit Expo center in Tulsa, Okla., in July. Expanded unemployme­nt insurance bolstered household finances, but the weekly $600 benefits lapsed in late July.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States