The Denver Post

Democrats’ reform package considers post- Trump era

- By Nicholas Fandos

» House Democrats unveiled a far- reaching package of government reforms Wednesday meant to protect federal watchdogs, bulk up congressio­nal oversight powers and impose new penalties on presidenti­al appointees who violate an ethics law by participat­ing in political activities while on the job.

T he multifacet­ed bill, assembled by seven House committee chairmen at the direction of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, is Democrats’ most comprehens­ive response to date to what they consider abuses and excesses by

President Donald Trump and his administra­tion.

It has almost no chance of becoming law as long as Trump is in office, but Democrats say the bill would be an early priority if their party retakes control of the Senate and the White House in January.

Republican­s are unlikely to see the proposals in such a favorable light, although some of them aim to address concerns that have cropped up in other administra­tions when Democrats and Republican­s have technicall­y stayed within the bounds of the law but defied Congress’ intent.

Even institutio­nalists in the party who traditiona­lly have fought for Congress’ interests against the executive branch now view House Democrats as fixated on destroying Trump above all else and disingenuo­us in their desire for real bipartisan change.

Several of the provisions are likely to be susceptibl­e to legal challenge.

The bill would grant new protection­s to whistle- blowers, including the right to sue if they are identified publicly by government officials, as was the case with an anonymous intelligen­ce agency whistle- blower whose complaint about a July 2019 phone call by Trump prompted the impeachmen­t inquiry.

Another section of the bill would take aim at Trump’s rash of firings of independen­t inspectors general embedded in federal agencies who were investigat­ing him or his appointees. It would stipulate that only the president can fire an inspector general and only for cause.

Democrats would try to limit the president’s pardon powers, explicitly outlawing presidents from pardoning themselves, and pause the statute of limitation­s on any federal offense committed by presidents or vice presidents during their time in office so they cannot escape charges that otherwise would be brought if they were not in office.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States