The Denver Post

What Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s collars meant

- By Vanessa Friedman

In 2014, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the pioneering legal mind and advocate for equal treatment of the sexes who died Friday, did something that probably none of her male colleagues were ever asked to do: She gave a tour of her office closet.

The occasion was an interview with Katie Couric after Ginsburg’s strongly worded, 35- page dissent in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby decision, in which the court sided with a corporatio­n’s desire to challenge the Affordable Care Act’s contracept­ion mandate on the grounds of religious freedom.

But Ginsburg did not seem remotely put out about starting the conversati­on with fashion.

Opening the imposing wood doors of her wardrobe, the justice revealed, on one side, the long black robes of the court, and on the other — taking up more than half the hanger space — her extensive collection of elaborate collars. She had them, she said, “from all over the world.” She had them for every occasion, and for every kind of opinion of the court.

As much as the nickname “The Notorious R. B. G.,” which came to symbolize Ginsburg’s status as a pop culture hero in her later years, the collars served as both semiology and semaphore: They signaled her positions before she even opened her mouth, and they represente­d her unique role as the second woman on the country’s highest court. Shining like a beacon amid the dark sea of denaturing judicial robes, Ginsburg’s collars were unmistakab­le in photograph­s and from the court floor.

Though obviously Ginsburg’s legacy of jurisprude­nce is her most important gift to history, her understand­ing of her own significan­ce as a role model was undeniable. As the rare female law student ( and student in the rarefied air at the top of the class) — not to mention the rare female lawyer — she was used to being the only one. She knew that every statement she made, every gesture, every image, would be noted, picked over and parsed. All her choices mattered. So she might as well imbue them with meaning.

Even if they were only about the collar.

In 2009, in an interview with The Washington Post, she explained how her collection originated: “You know, the standard robe is made for a man because it has a place for the shirt to show, and the tie,” Ginsburg told the paper. So she and Sandra

Day O’Connor, the first female

justice on the court, “thought it would be appropriat­e if we included as part of our robe something typical of a woman.” They weren’t going to obscure their sex or pretend it was beside the point. It was part of the point.

She wore her majority opinion collar, a beige and egg yolk yellow crocheted style suspended from a gold chain, with beaded drops at the hem, that was a gift from her law clerks, when speaking for the majority of the court.

Her dissent collar, a spiky bejeweled necklace on a black band from Banana Republic that had been gifted to her when she was named a Glamour Woman of the Year in 2012, she wore when she read her equally spiky dissents from the bench. ( She also wore it the day after the 2016 election, which no one thought was a coincidenc­e.)

Her crisp white jabot edged in black ( from the gift shop of the Metropolit­an Opera), which was a replica of a similar jabot worn by a character in a Verdi opera she had attended, she wore when she received her honorary law degree at Harvard. And then there was her favorite: a delicate white style from Capetown, South Africa.

Her affinity for collars became so well known, fans began to send her their own creations as gifts, and she wore those with pride, too.

When, in 2018, a documentar­y on her life called “RBG” was released, the poster featured only a sketch of Ginsburg’s head — along with a lace collar. The film’s first poster, in fact, simply featured the collar and the title; it was all that was needed.

To pay attention to what a powerful woman wears is often dismissed as a way to denigrate her. But not to pay attention in this case is to disrespect the attention to detail that marked Ginsburg’s work in all its dimensions.

After all, a gauntlet may once have been a metal glove, but sometimes it can also be a lace collar. That doesn’t make it any less effective at challengin­g an antiquated status quo.

 ??  ??
 ?? Stephen Crowley, © The New York Times Co. ?? From left, Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor in January 2011.
Stephen Crowley, © The New York Times Co. From left, Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor in January 2011.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States