The Denver Post

Abortion debate and the risk of pregnancy

-

Re: “The abortion question on your November ballot,” Sept. 27 letter to the editor

The letter by Thomas Perille,

M. D., supporting Propositio­n 115 banning abortions in Colorado after 22 weeks states that abortions later in pregnancy present a “substantia­l risk to the health and life of women.”

The main risk for women who are pregnant is the pregnancy itself. Pregnancy is not a benign condition, and women die from being pregnant. This is a medical fact. The risk of death for women in pregnancy ( the maternal mortality ratio), has been going up for women in the United States as more women are having desired pregnancie­s later in life. But this makes them more vulnerable to life- threatenin­g complicati­ons of pregnancy as well as higher risks of catastroph­ic fetal abnormalit­ies. These problems often are not known until after 22 weeks.

Over 40 years ago, I began developing safe methods of abortion later in pregnancy because my patients needed them. In numerous papers I have published in medical journals, which can be found on my web site at www. drhern. com., major complicati­on rates for thousands of my patients having abortions after the first trimester range from zero to 0.5%, whereas the major complicati­on rate for term delivery is routinely 28% or more since almost one- third of all births are conducted as cesarean deliveries.

A sponsor of 115 announced that one purpose of the legislatio­n is to “put the Boulder Abortion Clinic out of business.”

No woman’s life should be at the mercy of the next election. Prop. 115 should be defeated by the voters.

Warren M. Hern, M. D. Boulder Editor’s note: Hern is director of Boulder Abortion Clinic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States