The Denver Post

Bill aims to cut testing

Students would skip standardiz­ed tests if state gets the OK

- By Tiney Ricciardi

Colorado students could be exempted from taking stateissue­d standardiz­ed tests this year if a bill introduced in the legislatur­e passes — and policymake­rs are able to convince the federal government there are other ways to assess student learning this year.

HB 21-1125 seeks to cancel the Colorado Measures of Academic Success, or CMAS, tests, administer­ed annually to thirdthrou­gh eighth-graders, for the 2020-21 academic year. It would also, in the event the exams can’t be called off, prohibit districts from using the results as an accountabi­lity measure for teachers and principals.

Standardiz­ed testing has proved a divisive issue among Colorado school leaders, education advocates and lawmakers. Those who support exams believe they’re critical to understand­ing how the pandemic has impacted students’ academic proficienc­y.

But those behind the bill say schools face stiff logistical challenges in hosting CMAS tests and that doing so would sacrifice precious instructio­nal time while results would come too late to address students’ needs.

If the bill passes, Colorado would still need a waiver from federal education officials to be able to forgo the tests. Biden administra­tion officials this week said they expect states to issue

assessment­s to evaluate and support students where they’ve fallen behind during the pandemic.

Rico Munn, superinten­dent of Aurora Public Schools, supports suspending standardiz­ed tests because of the toll on staff members and students.

“You essentiall­y stop instructio­n for period of time in order to do all the testing and all protocols. We’ve lost a lot of instructio­n time, and we place a higher value on that,” Munn said. “Everyone is pretty clear that standardiz­ed testing increases stress in a school environmen­t. What our kids are clearly telling us is they already feel a significan­t amount of stress. … When you compare that against the data we would expect to get, it don’t see that it’s worth the tradeoffs.”

Sen. Rachel Zenzinger, D-Arvada, co-sponsor of the bill, said there are tests other than CMAS that can provide the necessary context to evaluate students’ academic needs, such as the Measure of Academic Progress, or MAP, assessment.

Colorado schools regularly give tests such as these, so Zenzinger and her co-sponsors plan to amend the bill and offer those results to the federal government as a way to identify which academic areas should be addressed and how as early as this summer.

“One consistent theme I’ve heard from the majority of people is the idea we should be trying to find data that we can then act upon,” Zenzinger said.

“We, as bill sponsors, are committed to that concept. We’re not trying to hide or not learn the truth. It’s just that CMAS is not the best or most practical way to get the informatio­n that (officials) want.”

Logistical challenges

One of the biggest obstacles to hosting CMAS this year is purely logistical.

Colorado’s vendor, Pearson, will not permit students to take the test remotely, Zenzinger said, so schools would have to collect computers they issued to students at the beginning of the year, scrub them and update them to meet the company’s security standards. Then students would have to go into buildings for the test, after which the devices would need to be scrubbed again.

Lorrie Shepard, a professor in the University of Colorado’s School of Education, said the process is not only time-consuming but also inequitabl­e because it inhibits kids who don’t have another device at home from learning while the test is being administer­ed.

“It takes an estimated two to three weeks minimum to administer the test. Because of social distancing it will take much longer,” she said.

Those are weeks many teachers and children can’t afford to lose, after a fall semester marred by frequent changes in class format and disruption­s to learning, Zenzinger said.

Shepard also noted CMAS is designed to test students on a full year of material, but educators say time constraint­s brought on by the pandemic have forced them to whittle down lessons and focus only on the most critical concepts and skills.

That’s likely to amplify the stress students feel about taking the exams.

“It’s not fair to say tests are zero-cost in terms of instructio­nal time and emotional wear and tear on students and teachers,” Shepard said.

Are results reliable?

Despite those challenges, Colorado Education Commission­er Katy Anthes said schools need to be prepared to conduct CMAS testing based on the federal guidance released this week. Although districts have interim assessment­s such as MAPS that they use to track students’ progress throughout the year, the state does not collect those results.

CMAS “is the state’s main tool, or really one of the only tools, for understand­ing where our students are in terms of their learning and how they’re doing compared to a standard,” Anthes said. “We are all interested in understand­ing what has transpired because of COVID. How much learning loss has there been? In which subject areas, at what grade levels? We don’t know that unless we provide some measuremen­t tool and this is our measuremen­t tool.”

Zenzinger and fellow bill cosponsor Rep. Barbara McLachlan, D-Durango, hope data from exams such as MAPS can be used in lieu of CMAS to satisfy the federal requiremen­ts. They believe results from those assessment­s more accurately reflect students’ academic proficienc­ies because of the format and participat­ion rate.

According to a nationwide survey by Chalkbeat and The Associated Press, districts that predominan­tly serve white students were three times as likely to offer inperson learning than were districts where students of color make up the majority of the student body. In Colorado’s largest district, Denver Public Schools, 41% of Black students and 38% of Latino students enrolled in remote learning compared with 22% of white students, Chalkbeat reported.

That disparity will skew results for an in-person test, Zenzinger said.

Parents also can opt their kids out of CMAS testing, and this week DPS board member Tay Anderson launched an initiative to encourage parents to do just that.

Colorado kids did not take CMAS last April after the coronaviru­s shuttered schools, so the data would not be comparable year over year, test opponents said. McLachlan worries that even if standardiz­ed testing continues as planned this year, the results won’t be available soon enough to address the gaps in learning.

“CMAS results don’t come out until August or September, but that really doesn’t do the students any good. It’s best to have early data to address (learning loss) over the summer with summer school or tutoring. Some schools are talking about extending the year,” she said. “Those are things we should be thinking about — how do we best take care of students?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States