The Denver Post

Developer sues city for rezone denial

- By Thomas Gounley BusinessDe­n

A developmen­t firm that owns 33 acres across the street from a light rail station in Littleton has sued the city after its bid to rezone the property was rejected last month.

Arizona-based Evergreen Devco, which has an office in Denver, filed the lawsuit against Littleton and its City Council in Arapahoe County District Court on May 31. A spokeswoma­n for the city didn’t respond to a request for comment by press time.

The lawsuit revolves around land at the southwest corner of Mineral Avenue and Santa Fe Drive, which Evergreen purchased in 2017 for $6.5 million, according to public records. The land is diagonal to RTD’s Littleton/Mineral Station, and across Mineral Avenue from the station’s Park-N-Ride.

According to the lawsuit, the land is used for agricultur­al purposes but has been zoned “Planned Developmen­t — Commercial” since 1985, when the “Santa Fe Park Planned Developmen­t Plan” was approved. That plan was amended once in 1993.

Evergreen says in its lawsuit that it applied for a second amendment to the developmen­t plan — essentiall­y a rezoning — in October 2018, and that it worked with the Littleton city staff to revise the applicatio­n throughout 2019 and 2020.

According to the Littleton Independen­t, Evergreen wants to build a project called Riverpark at the site, with 270 apartments, a 170-bed retirement home, stores and restaurant­s.

The developmen­t plan currently in place for the site allows apartments only on the east side of the property, but Evergreen wants to build them on the west side, according to the lawsuit. The desired rezoning would allow for the assisted-living use and more drive-thru businesses.

“Evergreen described the evolution of the applicatio­n from its start as a more residentia­lly oriented plan with higher density, that did not meet the city’s revenue goals, to an applicatio­n that focuses on furthering the city’s long-term revenue goals, mitigation existing regional traffic issues, and solving existing drainage and wetlands problems,” Evergreen says in its lawsuit.

Evergreen’s applicatio­n for the amendment was approved by Littleton’s Planning Commission in January by a vote of 6-1, according to the lawsuit.

It was then forwarded to the council, with city staff members recommendi­ng approval.

An initial vote scheduled for April 20 was tabled over parking concerns, with Littleton officials suggesting the project should build a parking garage and reduce the number of surface parking

spaces, according to the Littleton Independen­t.

A garage would be much costlier, and Evergreen’s Tyler Carlson — the managing partner who leads the Denver office — referred to the suggestion as “a zoning act of war against our property.”

“I won’t be suckerpunc­hed in the face on a parking standard that is fairly arbitrary and contrived, doesn’t exist anywhere in the metro area, or the entire Front Range,” Carlson said at the April 20 meeting, according to the Littleton Independen­t.

“I cannot build it. I’ve told you that a million times. The residentia­l residents can’t afford it. The commercial tenants can’t afford it. This property will continue to sit vacant.”

The city’sstaff subsequent­ly agreed to help line up funding partners for a possible garage, according to the newspaper. But it wasn’t enough to win over the council, which voted 5-2 on May 4 to reject the applicatio­n, according to the lawsuit.

Evergreen is asking the court to determine that the council “exceeded its jurisdicti­on and acted arbitraril­y and capricious­ly” in rejecting the applicatio­n, and to rule that the rezoning must be granted.

In its lawsuit, Evergreen highlights multiple comments by council members that the company says show they were not judging the applicatio­n by the correct criteria.

That includes Councilmem­ber Scott Melin saying he did not want to see “just another strip mall developmen­t,” that assisted living units are “not unambiguou­sly housing” and that the planned market-rate apartments would be “bordering on luxury.”

Evergreen’s Carlson declined to comment on the lawsuit. The company is represente­d by attorneys Martha Fitzgerald, Carolynne White and Angela Hygh of Denver’s Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck.

Evergreen has developed several retail buildings in the Denver area. Among the company’s other projects in the works locally is Runway 35, a pair of mixed-use projects along Central Park Boulevard north and south of Interstate 70 that the company is planning with Denver-based Wall Developmen­t. Fast-food chain In-N-Out has proposed a restaurant within the project.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States