The Denver Post

Wildfire smoke is hurting your skin

- By Courtney Rubin

Dr. Maria Wei, a professor of dermatolog­y at the University of California San Francisco, was helping a student come up with a project about how the environmen­t affects skin when she looked out her office window and saw the ash falling from the sky. It was the first day of the California Camp Fire — the 2018 wildfire that was, at the time, the state’s deadliest and most destructiv­e.

“I wondered how it would affect the skin, especially since I’d just biked in to work,” she said.

The study, published by Wei, her student, Raj Fadadu, and some of their colleagues in June, was the first to link skin disease (atopic dermatitis, aka eczema) to wildfire smoke.

It won’t be the last.

As climate change makes wildfires increasing­ly frequent and devastatin­g — and as smoke from flames blows across the country — scientists are just beginning to untangle all the ways the changing environmen­t threatens human health, including via the skin, the body’s largest and most exposed organ. Of course, beauty companies are right there with them, offering, among other things, products labeled “antipollut­ion” or “pollution protection.”

You don’t need any of them. But for anyone who has bandwidth enough to spare for skin care these days — and for those who don’t have the luxury of staying indoors — here’s what we know about what pollution does to your skin, and what you can do about it.

Exposure, explained

When researcher­s talk about pollution exposure, they’re generally talking about particulat­e matter smaller than 2.5 microns. (A human hair is at least about 20 microns in diameter.) These can get in the bloodstrea­m, affect every organ and have a range of potentiall­y frightenin­g implicatio­ns. Dermatolog­ists, though, are interested in how these particles land on the skin — and possibly penetrate it — and create a cascade of inflammati­on, accelerati­ng signs of aging and causing disease. Studies have already shown that air pollution increases wrinkles and age spots.

all sort of know that when someone is a chronic smoker, they have that aged appearance and that yellow, sallow skin,” said Dr. Markus Boos, a pediatric dermatolog­ist at Seattle Children’s Hospital who has studied climate change and skin health. “It’s kind of a variation on that.”

There are dozens of kinds of pollutants that produce the free radicals that damage lipids, proteins and DNA in skin cells, weakening the skin barrier. Some pollutants trigger receptors that regulate detoxifyin­g proteins — a good thing — but at the same time stimulate other inflammato­ry pathways that make the skin more sensitive and leach it of water. The result: dry, scaly skin.

Things get worse when pollution mixes with ultraviole­t, or UV, light. The combinatio­n of the two is synergisti­c, not additive. in car exhaust, for example, are overactiva­ted by sunlight, making them even more toxic, said Giuseppe Valacchi, a professor of regenerati­ve medicine at North Carolina State University, whose lab simulates pollution so he can study its effect on the body. The combinatio­n of pollutants and UV also depletes the skin’s supply of antioxidan­ts faster.

“It’s pretty dramatic,” said Dr. Karen Burke, an assistant clinical professor of dermatolog­y at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York and an author of a study on UV light and pollution. The combinatio­n also causes more oxidative damage to cells, which leads to premature aging and skin disease, she said.

Underestim­ating wildf ire’s effect

The specific effects of wildfire pollution on the skin are less clear, in part because every wildfire is unique depending on what it burns (building materials? trees? bushes?), its intensity and its temperatur­e. The most toxic com“we are created at the highest temperatur­es, Valacchi said.

(This is also true of cigarettes. There is no healthy way to smoke, but the worst option is if you smoke so quickly the ash doesn’t fall. “You have a very high combustion temperatur­e, and it creates very, very, very carcinogen­ic compounds,” he said.)

The eczema and wildfire study focused on that disease because afflicted people have an impaired skin barrier, meaning they would be more likely to have a reaction to smoke, Wei said. Some 7% of adults and 15% of children in the United States have eczema, but it’s not yet clear how this translates to the rest of the population since it’s not known if the incidence and severity of skin disease intensifie­s as pollution does, or if there’s a threshold of pollution at which the skin barrier completely fails, she said. (Exposure to air pollution from cars and industry takes place over a long period; wildfires are genparticl­es erally short but create intense exposure to hazardous air, Fadadu said.)

In the study, visits to the dermatolog­y clinic for itches were up significan­tly during the roughly two weeks of the fire in November, and 89% of adult patients had no previous diagnosis. (During the same time period in previous years, some 50% of patients with eczema had no previous diagnosis.) Researcher­s don’t know if these people had subclinica­l eczema and the fire “unmasked it,” Wei said, or if “these were normal folks who actually had symptoms of eczema from the fire.”

How to protect yourself

On poor air quality days caused by wildfires, wear long sleeves, long pants and a mask, Wei advised. You could also apply an emollient, which gives your skin an artificial barrier, she said.

Doctors and scientists agree that you almost certainly do not need to buy anything labeled “pollution protection” for everypound­s day use.

“Companies like to look for exotic new compounds, and some are just marketing because there is no way they can be absorbed by the skin,” Valacchi said.

(Also, buying too many beauty products is part of what’s brought about the terrifying prospect of a hotter future. By one estimation, the beauty industry produced more than

120 billion units of packaging in 2018, much of which ended up in the landfill or the ocean.)

Dr. Whitney Bowe, a dermatolog­ist in New York, advises applying a moisturize­r or serum with ceramides to help create a physical barrier to which the tiny particles can stick (and so not penetrate the skin). Makeup doesn’t help much here, by the way — most foundation­s don’t have sufficient moisturizi­ng properties to do the job, Bowe said.

Of course, this makes cleansing at night especially important, because “you don’t want all the pollutants you have been exposed to to sleep with you,” Valacchi said. Scrubbing can damage the same skin barrier you’ve been trying to bolster, so stick to using your fingers.

Besides the moisturize­r, some dermatolog­ists recommend vitamin C, which neutralize­s free radicals. When you cut an apple or a banana and it almost immediatel­y turns brown, that’s vitamin C oxidizing and protecting the fruit. But it’s because vitamin C is so active — and so unstable — that it’s extremely difficult to put in a beauty product, which means some companies use forms that either aren’t absorbed by the skin or aren’t able to act as an antioxidan­t,

Burke said.

“So many topical creams just totally don’t work,” she said.

Another way to get that reservoir of antioxidan­ts: Eat them. Polyphenol­s, the powerful antioxidan­ts that give plants their bright colors, help protect skin from the inside out.

“I tell my patients to eat the rainbow,” Bowe said. It certainly can’t hurt.

 ?? Derek Abella, © The New York Times Co. ?? A first-of-its-kind study links wildfires to skin damage.
Derek Abella, © The New York Times Co. A first-of-its-kind study links wildfires to skin damage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States