The Denver Post

Bill reveals plan to combat fentanyl

The measure would increase penalties on sellers and faces widespread criticism

- By Alex Burness and Elise Schmelzer

A new, bipartisan statehouse bill that will be unveiled this week includes stiffer criminal penalties for those who distribute fentanyl — although not for those who merely possess it — and millions of dollars for life-saving Narcan and naloxone, test strips and jailbased drug treatment.

It is the product of a monthslong process, as Gov. Jared Polis and lawmakers from both sides of the aisle entered this year’s legislativ­e session vowing to reverse the state’s exponentia­l rise in fentanyl overdose deaths and crack down on the merchants of this lethal opioid.

The bill has drawn criticism from Republican­s and experts who work with people with addiction. Republican­s want harsher penalties for people caught possessing fentanyl. Addiction and criminal legal experts don’t think harsher penalties for dealers will reduce deaths because jailed dealers will be replaced by someone else willing to sell.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is more potent and more addictive than many other opioids. Pharmaceut­ical fentanyl is prescribed by doctors as a painkiller, but an influx of illegally manufactur­ed fentanyl has flooded the U.S. illegal drug market.

Illegal drug manufactur­ers mix fentanyl into other substances because it is cheaper to produce. That means people who think they’re buying other drugs, like oxycodone or heroin, can be unsuspecti­ngly buying and consuming fentanyl, which can be fatal in tiny amounts. At least 767 people died of fentanyl overdoses in Colorado last year, although delays in state data reporting mean the real number is likely higher.

Polis, House Speaker Alec Garnett and others met with The Denver Post on Wednesday to discuss the bill.

“We are answering the call that we are hearing about helping get these people who are profiting from this poison off of the street,”

said Garnett, a Denver Democrat who will join with another Democrat and two Republican­s in sponsoring the bill.

Of the harm-reduction aspects of the bill, Garnett added, “We’re not going to stop recreation­al drug use, but this is going to help make sure people have the resources they need … to make sure this isn’t the last deadly drug that they may take.”

What’s in the bill?

According to a summary of the bill and interviews with those working on it, the bill set to debut today will include the following provisions:

• Increased penalties for people selling fentanyl.

•A distributi­on-resulting-in-death criminal statute that makes people who sell fentanyl that causes an overdose liable for sentencing under the state’s harshest felony drug charge.

• Requiremen­t that some people arrested for possession of fentanyl undergo mandatory treatment.

• A statewide overdose education campaign.

• $20 million for health department to purchase Naloxone and more money — no dollar amount has yet been specified — to create a bulk purchase fund for fentanyl test strips.

• $3 million to expand medication-assisted treatment in county jails.

Polis appeared especially bullish on the test strips, saying that by getting more drugs tested in more places, authoritie­s will be better equipped to trace drugs laced with fentanyl to their sources, “rather than having to follow a trail of dead bodies.”

The new crime of fentanyl distributi­on resulting in death would be punishable by eight to 32 years in prison and up to $1 million in fines.

Prosecutor­s would not have to prove that dealers knew they were selling fentanyl under the statute to bring a case. Dealers should know what they are selling, Garnett said.

“We cannot be shielding people who are selling drugs in an environmen­t where fentanyl is showing up more than it ever has,” Garnett said.

People will be immune from distributi­on resulting in death charges under the state’s Good Samaritan Law if they report an overdose, although they could face other charges, Garnett said.

More than a dozen people have been charged with distributi­on resulting in death in Colorado’s federal court under the federal version of the law. The first case was filed in 2017, although the majority have been filed in the past two years, court records show.

The bill also significan­tly lowers the weight thresholds for more serious penalties for fentanyl distributi­on, according to a fact sheet about the bill. For example, possessing more than 225 grams with intent to distribute is a level one drug felony under current law punishable by up to 32 years in prison. Under the bill, the threshold for a level one drug felony would be 50 grams of fentanyl. The law uses compound weights, meaning the total weight of the pill or powder, regardless of how much of that weight is fentanyl.

“The numbers that were in place for other non-synthetic drugs just didn’t make sense for this,” said Mesa County District Attorney Dan Rubinstein, a Republican.

Critics already

The bill isn’t out yet, but it’s already subject to partisan criticism. The conservati­ve editorial board of The Gazette newspaper in Colorado Springs called the bill a “copout” because it doesn’t include new punishment for fentanyl possession. Conservati­ve political operative Michael Fields said Wednesday he and his allies would continue running ads and mailers pressuring Polis and the legislatur­e to “actually fix this problem.”

These conservati­ves and many others have called on the legislatur­e to overturn a bipartisan 2019 state law that downgraded some drug possession charges from a felony to a misdemeano­r. The upcoming bill does not propose to reverse that policy.

Experts on drug use and those who work closely with people who use drugs also are concerned by this proposal.

“Incarcerat­ing drug dealers has little or no impact on disrupting drug supplies because the drug market is dynamic,” reads a new policy brief from the progressiv­e Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition and the Denver-based Harm Reduction Action Center. “It responds to the demand for drugs by replacing imprisoned sellers with either new recruits or increased drug selling by existing dealers, which is known as the ‘replacemen­t effect.’ ”

It doesn’t appear that the backers of this bill will be willing to budge much there. Polis and Garnett described increased punishment for distributo­rs as core to their project.

“This approach of tougher criminal penalties for those who are dealing death,” the governor said, “is absolutely appropriat­e and needed.”

That critical progressiv­e policy brief also argued against increasing criminal penalties for people who distribute to someone who ends up dying of overdose.

“There is no systematic empirical evidence that (such) prosecutio­ns slow the sale of illegal drugs,” the brief reads.

Lisa Raville, director of the Harm Reduction Action Center, said legislator­s are missing an opportunit­y to legalize sites at which people could use drugs safely and under supervisio­n.

“That can save somebody’s life today,” Raville said.

Many lawmakers agree, but the Democrats in the statehouse majority have long seen these sites as too politicall­y toxic to touch.

Raville added, “I know it’s an election year, but they’re having no trouble doubling down on the worst ideas of the drug war, which are incarcerat­ion and ization.”

Harm-reduction experts are glad that the bill doesn’t propose extra punishment for possession of fentanyl — but there’s disagreeme­nt on that approach even among the bill’s own sponsors.

“It doesn’t fix the underlying problem of … possession,” Larimer County Republican state Rep. Mike Lynch, whose name will appear alongside Garnett’s on the bill, said in an interview Wednesday.

“We’ll see. We’re working through it.”

Garnett defended the fact that the bill does not raise penalties for those who possess fentanyl. That aspect is certain to be subject to much debate as the bill moves through the legislativ­e process.

“We are trying to help those people who are suffering from substance abuse without threatenin­g a felony on top of that,” Garnett said. “It is proven through data that that’s not an effective public policy tool.”

Denver Post staff writer Nick Coltrain contribute­d to this report.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States