The Denver Post

Latecomer’s guide to cryptocurr­ency

- By Kevin Roose © The New York Times Co.

Until fairly recently, if you lived anywhere other than San Francisco, it was possible to go days or even weeks without hearing about cryptocurr­ency.

Now, suddenly, it’s inescapabl­e. Look one way, and there are Matt Damon and Larry David doing ads for crypto startups. Swivel your head — oh, hey, it’s the mayors of Miami and New York City, arguing over who loves Bitcoin more. Two NBA arenas are now named after crypto companies, and it seems as if every corporate marketing team in America has jumped on the NFT — or non-fungible token — bandwagon.

Crypto! For years, it seemed like the kind of fleeting tech trend most people could safely ignore, like hoverboard­s or Google Glass. But its power, both economic and cultural, has become too big to overlook. Twenty percent of American adults, and 36% of millennial­s, own cryptocurr­ency, according to a recent Morning Consult survey. Coinbase, the crypto trading app, has landed on top of the App Store’s charts at least twice in the past year. Today, the crypto market is valued at around $1.75 trillion — roughly the size of Google. And in Silicon Valley, engineers and executives are bolting from cushy jobs in droves to join the crypto gold rush.

As it has gone mainstream, crypto has inspired an unusually polarized discourse. Its biggest fans are wild-eyed fanatics who think it’s saving the world, while its biggest skeptics are convinced it’s all a scam — an environmen­tkilling speculativ­e bubble orchestrat­ed by grifters and sold to greedy dupes, which will probably crash the economy when it bursts.

I’ve been writing about

crypto for nearly a decade. These days, I usually describe myself as a crypto moderate, although I admit that may be a cop-out.

I agree with the skeptics that much of the crypto market consists of overvalued, overhyped and possibly fraudulent assets, and I am unmoved by the most utopian pro-crypto sentiments (such as the claim by Jack Dorsey, the cryptoobse­ssed former Twitter chief, that Bitcoin will usher in world peace).

But as I’ve experiment­ed more with crypto — including accidental­ly selling an NFT for more than $500,000 in a charity auction last year — I’ve come to accept that it isn’t all a cynical money grab and that there are things of actual substance being built. I’ve also learned, in my career as a tech journalist, that when so much money, energy and talent flows toward a new thing, it’s generally a good idea to pay attention, regardless of your views.

My strongest-held belief about crypto, though, is that it is terribly explained.

Recently, I spent several months reading everything I could about crypto. I found that most beginner’s guides took the form of boring podcasts, thinly researched Youtube videos and blog posts written by hopelessly biased investors. Many anti-crypto takes, on the other hand, were undercut by inaccuraci­es and outdated arguments.

What I couldn’t find was a sober, dispassion­ate explanatio­n of what crypto actually is along with answers to some of the most common questions it raises. This guide — a megaFAQ, really — is an attempt to fix that.

Crypto will be transforma­tive

Understand­ing crypto now — especially for skeptics — is important for a few reasons.

The first is that crypto wealth and ideology is going to be a transforma­tive force in our society in the coming years.

You’ve heard about the overnight Dogecoin millionair­es and Lamborghin­i-driving Bitcoin bros.

But that’s not the half of it. The crypto boom has generated vast new fortunes at a clip we’ve never seen before — the closest comparison is probably the discovery of oil in the Middle East — and has turned its biggest winners into some of the richest people in the world, essentiall­y overnight. Some crypto riches could vanish if the market crashes, but enough has already been cashed out to ensure that crypto’s influence will linger for decades.

Crypto’s madcap, memecrazed online culture can make it seem frivolous and shallow. It’s not. Cryptocurr­encies, even the jokey ones, are part of a robust, well-funded ideologica­l movement that has serious implicatio­ns for our political and economic future. Bitcoin, which emerged out of the ashes of the

2008 financial crisis, first caught on among libertaria­ns and anti-establishm­ent activists who saw it as the cornerston­e of a new, incorrupti­ble monetary system. Since then, other crypto realms have fashioned similarly lofty goals, like building a decentrali­zed, largely unregulate­d version of Wall Street on the blockchain.

We are already starting to see a swell of crypto money headed toward the U.S. political system. Crypto entreprene­urs are donating millions of dollars to candidates and causes, and lobbying firms have fanned out across the country to win support for pro-crypto legislatio­n. In the coming years, crypto moguls will bankroll the campaigns of cryptofrie­ndly candidates, or run for office themselves.

Some will peddle influence in the familiar ways — forming super PACS, funding think tanks, etc. — while others will try to escape partisan gridlock altogether. (Crypto millionair­es are already buying up land in the South Pacific to build their own blockchain utopias.)

Crypto is poised to soon become one of a handful of true wedge issues, with politician­s all over the world forced to pick a side. Some countries, like El Salvador — whose cryptolovi­ng president recently announced the developmen­t of a “Bitcoin City” at the base of a volcano — will go full crypto. Other government­s may decide that crypto is a threat to their sovereignt­y and crack down, as China did when it outlawed cryptocurr­ency trading last year. The divide between the world’s pro-crypto and no-crypto zones could end up being at least as big as the divide between the Chinese internet and the American one, and maybe even more consequent­ial.

Crypto could be destructiv­e

The second reason to pay attention to crypto is that understand­ing it now is the best way to ensure it doesn’t become a destructiv­e force later.

In the early 2010s, the most common knock on social media apps like Facebook and Twitter was that they just wouldn’t work as businesses. The theory wasn’t so much that social media was dangerous or bad; just that it was boring and corny, a hypedriven fad that would disappear as quickly as it had arrived.

What nobody was asking back then — at least not loudly — were questions like: What if social media is actually insanely successful? What kind of regulation­s would need to exist in a world where Facebook and Twitter were the dominant communicat­ion platforms? How should tech companies with billions of users weigh the trade-offs between free speech and safety? What product features could prevent online hate and misinforma­tion from cascading into offline violence?

By the middle of the decade, when it was clear that these were urgent questions, it was too late. The platform mechanics and ad-based business models were already baked in.

Are we making the same mistake with crypto today? It’s possible. No one knows yet whether crypto will or won’t “work,” in the grandest sense. (Anyone who claims to know is selling something.) But there is real money and energy in it, and many tech veterans I’ve spoken to tell me that today’s crypto scene feels, to them, like 2010 all over again — with tech disrupting money this time, instead of media.

The third reason to study up on crypto is that it can be genuinely fun to learn about.

The crypto agenda is so huge and multidisci­plinary — drawing together elements of economics, engineerin­g, philosophy, law, art, energy policy and more — that it offers lots of footholds for beginners. Want to discuss the influence of Austrian economics in Bitcoin developmen­t? There’s probably a Discord server for that. Want to join a DAO (decentrali­zed autonomous organizati­on) that invests in NFTS, or play a video game that pays you in crypto tokens for winning? Dive right in.

Again, I don’t really care whether you emerge from these explainers as a true believer, a devoted skeptic or something in between. Participat­e or abstain as you wish. All I’m after is understand­ing — and possibly, a little relief from the question that has consumed my social and profession­al life for the past several years:

“So … can I ask you a question about crypto?”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States