The Denver Post

Let’s clear up some facts about the so- called “Keystone Pipeline”

- By Ted Williams Writers on the Range

” A report that the Biden administra­tion is weighing greater imports of Canadian oil is putting a renewed focus on the canceled Keystone XL pipeline and whether it would have made any difference with today’s tight oil supply.” — Energywire

Ever since boycotts started blocking Russian petroleum products, social media has been rife with memes that blame rising gasoline prices on “the cancellati­on of the Keystone Pipeline.” Example: “Sooo, if shutting down Russia’s pipeline( s) will hurt their economy, wouldn’t shutting down ours hurt our economy? Asking for a buddy.”

Most of the criticism comes from people who recycle truthiness. Former vice president Mike Pence: “Gas prices have risen across the country because of this administra­tion’s war on energy — shutting down the Keystone Pipeline.” Republican Rep. Jim Jordan: “Biden shut off the Keystone Pipeline.”

Here’s what really happened: No one shut down, canceled, or shut off the Keystone Pipeline. It is fully operationa­l, daily delivering 590,000 barrels of tar- sands oil in Canada to U. S. refineries.

What some pipeline advocates think is the “Keystone Pipeline” is a 1,700- mile “shortcut” called Keystone XL, or KXL. It would have sliced through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma to the Texas Gulf Coast, delivering 830,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day. Many residents of those states fought fiercely against the pipeline cutting through their land.

Now, “Build the Keystone Pipeline” has become a socialmedi­a mantra, as if the United States could so decree. It is the Canadian firm, TC Energy, formerly Transcanad­a, that officially terminated the project once President Biden withdrew its permits.

Even if constructi­on on the pipeline began tomorrow, KXL could not be up and running in less than five years. The KXL pipeline was a project developed by a foreign company that would have delivered foreign oil products to mostly foreign markets.

When President Trump repermitte­d KXL in 2017, his own State Department reported that it would not lower gasoline prices. The price of oil is set by the global market and certainly not by U. S. presidents. What’s more, the project was just about dead for a number of reasons, including litigation from aggrieved property owners whose land TC Energy seized by eminent domain.

We should also remember that rendering gasoline from tarsands oil, the planet’s dirtiest petroleum, is far more polluting and energy- intensive than convention­al refining. Some carbon content is burned off in a process that belches greenhouse gases and generates toxic waste called petcoke, which is dumped around the United States in piles six stories high. Petcoke billows through neighborho­ods and infiltrate­s schools and houses even when windows are shut.

Bitumen, basically asphalt, continues to be strip- mined from what used to be Canada’s boreal forests in Alberta. Too thick to be piped, it’s spiked with volatile liquid condensate from natural gas and thus converted to a toxic tar- sands cocktail called “dilbit,” short for diluted bitumen. Dilbit, sent through the existing Keystone pipeline, contains chloride salts, sulfur, abrasive minerals and acids, and must be pumped under high pressure. It’s murder on pipes.

In addition to greenhouse gases and petcoke, tar- sands waste products include lakes, rivers, fish, wildlife and people. Between 1995 and 2006, when tarsands extraction was accelerati­ng, Alberta’s First Nations suffered a sudden 30% increase in cancer rates.

KXL, if built, also threatened the world’s largest aquifer — the Ogallala. Anyone who thinks Nebraska lacks water should visit Green Valley Township, where I encountere­d Ogallala water so close to the surface it flowed along dirt roads and ditches. Pintails, mallards, and widgeon billowed out of them. But parts of the aquifer are now depleted, and a major dilbit spill could finish those parts off.

In 2011 a pipeline representa­tive named Shawn Howard assured me that ramming a dilbit pipe through the Ogallala aquifer would be risk free. “Why,” he demanded, “would we invest $ 13 billion in a pipeline and put a product in it that was going to destroy it like these activists are trotting out? It makes absolutely no business sense.”

The existing Keystone pipeline has ruptured 22 times, including spills in 2017 and 2019 that fouled land and water with 404,000 gallons of dilbit. Business sense, as the oil industry consistent­ly reminds us, is an attribute more often desired than possessed.

 ?? Mark Ralston, AFP via Getty Images file ?? A large excavator loads a truck with oil sands at a mine near the town of Fort Mcmurray in Alberta, Canada. The Keystone XL project would have created a shortcut from the oil sands region in Canada.
Mark Ralston, AFP via Getty Images file A large excavator loads a truck with oil sands at a mine near the town of Fort Mcmurray in Alberta, Canada. The Keystone XL project would have created a shortcut from the oil sands region in Canada.
 ?? ?? Ted Williams is a contributo­r to Writers on the Range, writersont­herange. org, an independen­t nonprofit dedicated to spurring conversati­on about the West. He writes about fish, wildlife and the environmen­t for national publicatio­ns.
Ted Williams is a contributo­r to Writers on the Range, writersont­herange. org, an independen­t nonprofit dedicated to spurring conversati­on about the West. He writes about fish, wildlife and the environmen­t for national publicatio­ns.
 ?? Nati Harnik, AP file ?? The Keystone Pipeline still operates from Alberta, Canada, to Cushing, Okla. The expansion project, or Keystone XL, has been shutdown. Above, a Keystone pumping station in Steele City, Neb.
Nati Harnik, AP file The Keystone Pipeline still operates from Alberta, Canada, to Cushing, Okla. The expansion project, or Keystone XL, has been shutdown. Above, a Keystone pumping station in Steele City, Neb.
 ?? Nati Harnik, AP file photos ?? In this July 29, 2017, photo, a sign reading: “Stop the Keystone XL Pipeline” sits in the proposed path of the Keystone XL pipeline, in Silver Creek, Neb.
Nati Harnik, AP file photos In this July 29, 2017, photo, a sign reading: “Stop the Keystone XL Pipeline” sits in the proposed path of the Keystone XL pipeline, in Silver Creek, Neb.
 ?? ?? A man demonstrat­es for the Keystone XL pipeline in Lincoln, Neb., in 2011.
A man demonstrat­es for the Keystone XL pipeline in Lincoln, Neb., in 2011.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States