The Denver Post

Assets still missing as proceeding­s start

- By David Yaffe-bellany

Lawyers for the collapsed cryptocurr­ency exchange FTX on Tuesday painted a grim picture of the firm’s finances and the fate of the billions of dollars in assets that customers lost.

“A substantia­l amount of assets have either been stolen or are missing,” James Bromley, a partner at the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell who is representi­ng FTX, said at a bankruptcy hearing in federal court in Delaware.

FTX filed for bankruptcy this month after a run on deposits left the company owing $8 billion. The firm’s failure has sparked investigat­ions by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Justice Department, focused on whether FTX misappropr­iated customer funds when it lent billions of dollars to Alameda Research, a crypto hedge fund. Both firms were owned by Sam Bankman-fried, a onetime crypto billionair­e who gave up control of the companies at the time of the bankruptcy filing.

The stunning collapse has left amateur investors and major firms scrambling to recover billions of dollars in cryptocurr­encies that they deposited on the FTX platform. In the coming months, the bankruptcy process will determine how much of that money can be retrieved.

But more than a week into the legal process, Bankman-fried’s poor management of FTX has left lawyers with limited informatio­n about the firm’s finances, Bromley said at the hearing.

He said that the company had faced cyberattac­ks, and that assets were still missing. He appeared to be referring to an apparent hack on the day the company filed for bankruptcy, which came to light when crypto researcher­s noticed the unauthoriz­ed movement of hundreds of millions of dollars in FTX assets.

At the hearing, Bromley presented a detailed account of FTX’S corporate history and its abrupt collapse this month. BankmanFri­ed had establishe­d a sprawling corporate empire, which was run as his “personal fiefdom,” Bromley said.

But in the end, he said, “the emperor had no clothes.”

Over the past two weeks, FTX has faced intense scrutiny over how it spent its money before the dramatic collapse. One business entity involved in the bankruptcy, Bromley said, bought almost $300 million worth of real estate in the Bahamas, where FTX was based, including homes and vacation properties used by senior FTX executives.

Bromley also offered new details about the final hours before Bankman-fried gave up control of the firm Nov. 11. Bankman-fried didn’t make the decision until early that morning, Bromley said, after consulting with his lawyers at the law firm Paul Weiss and with his father, Joe Bankman, a professor at Stanford Law School.

In his account of the chaos at FTX, Bromley echoed criticisms of Bankman-fried’s management that were articulate­d last week in a stunning court filing by John Jay Ray III, who took over from Bankman-fried as FTX’S chief executive.

A veteran of managing corporate collapses, Ray previously oversaw the unwinding of the energy trading firm Enron. But in the filing last week, he wrote that the mess at FTX was the worst he had seen in his career.

Much of the hearing Tuesday focused on a series of legal issues that have come up in the early stages of the bankruptcy.

Over the weekend, FTX disclosed a redacted list of its top 50 creditors, revealing that those entities or individual­s were owed a combined total of about

$3.1 billion. But the company kept the names of the creditors confidenti­al.

A key issue at the hearing was whether FTX would have to publicly disclose more detailed informatio­n about its creditors, a group that likely includes hundreds of thousands of

ordinary people who deposited money in the exchange.

Lawyers for FTX and some of the creditors argued that revealing that informatio­n would endanger users’ privacy.

U. S. Bankruptcy Judge John Dorsey ruled that the

informatio­n could stay private, at least for now.

“Everyone in this room knows the internet is wrought with potential dangers,” he said. “It’s important that we protect those individual­s who want to participat­e in this case.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States