The Denver Post

U.S. aims to curtail technology investment made inside China

- By Ana Swanson and Lauren Hirsch

Growing concerns about China’s military and economic ambitions have lawmakers and the White House weighing yet another effort to restrict Beijing’s access to advanced technologi­es that could be used in war.

This time, the U. S. government appears poised to extend its restrictio­ns to a new area: U.S. dollars that are used to finance the developmen­t of such technologi­es within Chinese borders.

For months, the Biden administra­tion has been preparing curbs on the investment­s that U. S. firms can make in China, particular­ly in areas such as advanced computing.

Those measures are now largely complete and could be issued within two months. The Treasury Department has been reaching out to other government­s, including the European Union, to try to ensure that they do not rush in to provide similar financing to China after the United States cuts it off, according to people familiar with the discussion­s.

The voyage of a spy balloon across the United States has set off newfound fears about the national security threats posed by the Chinese government. This week, lawmakers on both sides warned the White House that if the administra­tion did not move ahead with investment restrictio­ns, Congress would propose its own.

At a hearing Tuesday aimed at publicizin­g the security threat from China, Rep. Blaine Luetkemeye­r, R-MO., said it was the “committee’s job to examine all interconne­ctions between the Chinese and U.S. economy, specifical­ly connection­s supporting China’s military and human rights abuses, and pursue options to eliminate U. S. capital flowing into those areas.”

Rep. Maxine Waters, DCalif., said the United States needed to make sure that “hedge funds, private equity firms and Wall Street are not investing in ways that hurt our economy or funding the adversaria­l actions of the Chinese government.”

Members of the Biden administra­tion spent much of last year weighing how broadly to apply investment restrictio­ns, with officials reaching out to business executives to get their views on the impact that such a move might have.

Details of the pending executive order remain unclear, but it is expected to require companies to report more informatio­n to the government about their planned investment­s in certain adversaria­l countries. Several people familiar with the plans said the order would most likely prohibit outright investment­s in some sensitive areas, such as quantum computing, advanced semiconduc­tors and certain artificial intelligen­ce capabiliti­es with military or surveillan­ce applicatio­ns.

U.S. officials have also increasing­ly been concerned about China’s use of biotechnol­ogy, but several people said the administra­tion had decided to exclude the sector, at least initially.

Supporters of investment restrictio­ns say they would help fill in a significan­t hole in the economic barriers that the United States is setting up with China. The government already prohibits U.S. companies from directly selling certain advanced technologi­es to China, and it has long monitored the investment­s that Chinese companies make in the United States for potential security risks.

But the government has little control over or insight into money traveling from the United States to China, said Claire Chu, a senior China analyst at Janes, a defense intelligen­ce firm. Support has been building for the government to take more oversight of these kinds of deals, she said.

“It’s not so much a matter of whether this will happen as when,” Chu said.

Some of the proposals have prompted resistance from industry groups, which argued that overly broad restrictio­ns could overwhelm government officials in charge of oversight, creating big delays, and ricochet back on the U.S. economy, harming its competitiv­eness. A broader proposal in Congress last year to review outbound investment­s in critical sectors including infrastruc­ture and medicine prompted pushback from groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the U.s.-china Business Council.

“Industry is kind of united: We don’t want this,” said Antonia Tzinova, a partner at the law firm Holland & Knight who specialize­s in national security reviews of investment­s into the United States.

The Biden administra­tion’s plan appears to be much more narrowly targeted at a few sensitive sectors. But some industry representa­tives remain concerned that measures that apply only to U. S. firms, and not their foreign competitor­s, could put U.S. businesses at a disadvanta­ge.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States