The Denver Post

How would housing crisis ease?

Measure includes upzoning near transit and smaller units on existing lots

- By Seth Klamann sklamann@denverpost.com

Lawmakers have begun drafting a bill that will reform Colorado’s land-use landscape and promote developmen­t and density in transit areas, a top policy goal for Gov. Jared Polis in his and other leaders’ effort to address the state’s housing crisis.

As it stands, the draft turns on a handful of key elements that would centralize zoning decisions that have long been made by local government­s. Those elements include a statewide policy of allowing more dense developmen­t near transit corridors, easing the constructi­on of smaller units on existing lots and removing some parking requiremen­ts, said Senate Majority Leader Dominick Moreno, a Commerce City Democrat and the lawmaker set to sponsor the bill when it’s introduced in the coming weeks.

The proposal — which Moreno said may be split into multiple bills — would make it easier for property owners to build accessory-dwelling units on their property, which have typically required prior approval on a case-by- case basis. That “wouldn’t mean that local jurisdicti­ons don’t have the ability to have influence in what they look like.” Moreno said. They just “wouldn’t necessaril­y” be able to ban them outright.

Legislator­s also are considerin­g a statewide housing-needs assessment, which would identify housing deficienci­es and set targets to address them. That review also would help guide future state housing policy, Moreno said, including any future changes to land-use law.

In total, the plans Moreno described represent a first leap into a reform effort that likely will stretch beyond this year. The benefits will not be immediate: Buildings don’t sprout up overnight, and building more carriage houses in Denver won’t solve the

housing crisis. That’s why other lawmakers — primarily those in the House — have advocated for more immediate, pro-tenant policies, like allowing for rent control and establishi­ng various eviction protection­s.

“It took decades for us to get in such dire straits that we find ourselves in today,” said Peter Lifari, the CEO of the Adams County housing authority Maiker Housing Partners and a proponent of land-use reform. “It’s going to take some time for us to be able to bring on the units that are income-aligned.”

Re-evaluating Colorado’s landuse policy — who gets to say what gets built where — has been a top policy goal of Polis, some lawmakers and a broad coalition of Colorado nonprofits. Proponents argue that creating blanket, statewide zoning policies will increase density, expedite developmen­t, promote the use of public transport and, ultimately, lower the cost of housing.

Any statewide approach to zoning will be seen as an encroachme­nt on local control, and the Colorado Municipal League has signaled its opposition. But Moreno said the current crisis — Colorado’s housing stock was short by about 175,000 units in 2019, according to one estimate — requires a different approach.

“At the end of the day, this has to be a state and local partnershi­p if it’s going to work,” he said.

Details of the plan have not been released, and lawmakers and various interest groups have joked about the lack of clarity into what’s set to be one of the major legislativ­e issues this year. Rep. Javier Mabrey, a housing-minded Denver Democrat, has referred to the proposal as “Schrodinge­r’s land-use bill.”

The plan as laid out by Moreno represents a shift in zoning policy here. But it’s short of the seismic changes undertaken in other cities and states. Minneapoli­s eliminated single-family zoning altogether in 2018, while California moved to clear the way for more duplex buildings and lot-splitting three years later. Moreno cast Colorado’s approach as a middle ground between more radical rezoning and the status quo, one that respects local control while acknowledg­ing that housing is a statewide problem.

Local government groups aren’t so sure, and the silence surroundin­g the plan’s conception hasn’t eased their concerns. In a position paper released Thursday, the Colorado Municipal League reiterated its opposition to “preemption of local authority” and “one- size-fits- all approaches to zoning.” The group’s executive director, Kevin Bommer, said he didn’t want to comment on the plan until he has seen the draft.

In a statement to the Post, Polis said a bill was “closer” and that his office had worked with “more than 100 business, environmen­tal, housing and local leaders to ensure that Colorado can move forward with the best plan to address the housing crisis.”

The precise details of that plan — like how legislator­s will encourage density around transit corridors — remain in flux. Typically, transit-oriented developmen­t has involved zoning all single-family lots within a certain distance from a station for multifamil­y housing.

“Those are more nuanced conversati­ons around what fits within the character of a neighborho­od,” Moreno said. “That one’s going to be a bit more challengin­g. But there’s definitely an element of this that’s about creating more density, duplexes, triplexes.”

Because the exact details are still being worked out, it’s unclear how many new units could be built by loosening those zoning restrictio­ns. Chessy Brady, the transit-oriented developmen­t manager for RTD, said that generally speaking, much of the area around stations already is zoned to encourage density. To have a larger impact, she said, broad multifamil­y zoning would need to be extended farther, to a half-mile or more from stations.

A diverse coalition of housing, environmen­tal and business groups have been involved in the plans, and several previously told the Post that they wanted affordabil­ity protection­s baked into the land-use reforms. They don’t want new units to be entirely marketrate, or for newly rezoned and more valuable property to fuel further gentrifica­tion and displaceme­nt.

Moreno said he was aware of affordabil­ity concerns and that he and others were working on ways to address them in legislatio­n. But, like the rest of the effort, the exact details of how to do that are still being worked out.

“It’s something we’re very much dedicated to because the last thing we want to do is create a situation where people are being pushed out of their communitie­s,” he said. “We’re really sensitive to that.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States