The Denver Post

Fortenberr­y’s conviction of lying to federal authoritie­s reversed

- By Stefanie Dazio

An appellate court on Tuesday reversed a 2022 federal conviction against former U.S. Rep. Jeff Fortenberr­y of Nebraska, ruling that he should not have been tried in Los Angeles.

Fortenberr­y was convicted in March 2022 on charges that he lied to federal authoritie­s about an illegal $30,000 contributi­on to his campaign from a foreign billionair­e at a 2016 Los Angeles fundraiser.

He resigned his seat days later following pressure from congressio­nal leaders and Nebraska’s GOP governor.

In its Tuesday ruling, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit wrote that the trial venue of Los Angeles was improper because Fortenberr­y made the false statements during interviews with federal agents at his home in Lincoln, Neb., and in his lawyer’s office in Washington.

“Fortenberr­y’s conviction­s are reversed so that he may be retried, if at all, in a proper venue,” the decision said.

A federal jury in Los Angeles found the nine-term Republican guilty of concealing informatio­n and two counts of making false statements to authoritie­s. He vowed to appeal from the courthouse steps.

Fortenberr­y and his wife, Celeste Fortenberr­y, praised the court’s decision.

“We are gratified by the Ninth Circuit’s decision,” Jeff Fortenberr­y said in a statement. “Celeste and I would like to thank everyone who has stood by us and supported us with their kindness and friendship.”

Thom Mrozek, a spokespers­on for the U. S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, noted that the appellate court left a path open for future proceeding­s against Fortenberr­y.

“The ruling does not preclude a retrial on the charges that thenCongre­ssman Fortenberr­y made multiple false statements to federal agents,” Mrozek said in a statement.

“We are evaluating potential next steps before deciding how best to move forward.”

Patricia Hartman, a spokespers­on for the U. S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, declined to comment on the ruling’s potential impact for federal prosecutor­s in Washington.

“We cannot comment on matters where we don’t have charges filed,” she said in an email Tuesday.

A spokespers­on for the U. S. Attorney’s Office in Nebraska did not immediatel­y return a phone message.

Fortenberr­y was charged after denying to the FBI that he was aware he had received illicit funds from Gilbert Chagoury, a Nigerian billionair­e of Lebanese descent.

At trial, prosecutor­s presented recorded phone conversati­ons in which Fortenberr­y was repeatedly warned that the contributi­ons came from Gilbert Chagoury, a Nigerian billionair­e of Lebanese descent.

The donations were funneled through three strawmen at the 2016 fundraiser in Los Angeles.

The case stemmed from an FBI investigat­ion into $180,000 in illegal campaign contributi­ons to four campaigns from Chagoury, who lived in Paris at the time. Chagoury admitted to the crime in 2019 and agreed to pay a $1.8 million fine.

It was the first trial of a sitting congressma­n since Rep. Jim Traficant, D-ohio, was convicted of bribery and other felony charges in 2002.

 ?? JAE C. HONG — ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE ?? U.S. Rep. Jeff Fortenberr­y, R-neb., right, and wife, Celeste, arrive at the federal courthouse for his trial in Los Angeles on March 16, 2022.
JAE C. HONG — ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE U.S. Rep. Jeff Fortenberr­y, R-neb., right, and wife, Celeste, arrive at the federal courthouse for his trial in Los Angeles on March 16, 2022.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States