The Denver Post

House Republican­s block any action on border

- By Carl P. Leubsdorf Carl P. Leubsdorf is a Washington columnist for The Dallas Morning News.

Anyone who wonders why Congress hasn’t passed immigratio­n legislatio­n for decades need only look at the political shenanigan­s surroundin­g the current bipartisan Senate effort to cope with the issue.

Once again, the roadblocks are House Republican­s, who don’t believe in the concept of compromise, and Donald Trump, who prefers an issue to a solution that might politicall­y benefit President Joe Biden — not to mention help the country.

The House GOP, under its Trumpist new speaker, Mike Johnson, has contended all along that it won’t settle for anything less than the stricter measure it passed last year, though Biden and the Senate have rejected it. A recent comment to CNN by Texas Rep. Troy Nehls typifies its mindset: “I’m not willing to do too damn much right now to help a Democrat and to help Joe Biden’s approval rating,”

Its approach to the immigratio­n problem is to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for “egregious misconduct” for failing to shut the porous Southern border, even though some neutral legal experts said that doesn’t meet the constituti­onal standard of “high crimes and misdemeano­rs.”

Meanwhile, Trump, on the verge of clinching the GOP presidenti­al nomination, is lobbying Republican lawmakers against the compromise being hashed out by a bipartisan group of senators. The reason: He wants to campaign against Biden on the issue and be free, if elected, to institute his own draconian plan of shutting the border and deporting millions of immigrants who are here illegally.

That put Republican­s “in a quandary,” Senate GOP Leader Mitch Mcconnell told his colleagues last week, declaring “we don’t want to do anything to undermine” Trump. Mcconnell suggested he might reconsider his prior support for using a border compromise to help pass aid for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

When Mcconnell’s comments became public, Republican senators who have been working for more than a month to craft a bipartisan compromise reacted strongly, and the GOP leader reiterated that he still backs a package solution.

“I didn’t come here to have the president as a boss or a candidate as a boss,” said North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis. “I came here to pass good, solid policy.” He called it “immoral for me to think you looked the other way because you think this is the linchpin for President Trump to win.”

Utah Sen. Mitt Romney was even more direct. “The fact that ( Trump) would communicat­e to Republican senators and Congress people that he doesn’t want us to solve the border problem — because he wants to blame Biden for it — is really appalling,” he told reporters.

Still, the House GOP — which acts like it is a branch of the Trump campaign -- remains the chief barrier to passing legislatio­n this year, though Senate action may also depend on how many GOP senators are willing to defy Trump.

“Remember,” cautioned Indiana Sen. Mike Braun, “that’s the political force we’re dealing with.”

If this sounds depressing­ly familiar, it should. A decade ago, 14 Republican senators joined all Democrats in a 68- 32 vote for a bipartisan measure providing a path to citizenshi­p for millions of immigrants who came here illegally and enhanced border security. It resulted from months of negotiatio­ns by a so- called “gang of eight” senators from both parties.

Though analysts said there likely was a similar bipartisan majority in the House, then GOP Speaker John Boehner refused to bring the bill to the floor, because it lacked majority support from Republican members, and it died.

In 2019, Trump killed a more modest immigratio­n compromise, during the month- long government shutdown caused by congressio­nal refusal to fund the border wall that was one of his prime 2016 campaign promises.

At a White House meeting with senators from both parties, Trump agreed to a plan providing the border wall funds in return for legalizing the hundreds of thousands of “Dreamers” brought here illegally as small children.

But after hardline White House adviser Stephen Miller weighed in, Trump reversed himself later the same day and rejected the deal.

In the past three years, Biden has been unable through administra­tive actions to stem the substantia­l increase in illegal entries that resulted in part from his liberaliza­tion of border procedures and the expectatio­n by asylum seekers that they would get more lenient treatment.

More recently, the administra­tion has come under political pressure from northern Democratic mayors and governors trying to cope with the influx of illegal migrants sent their way by Republican critics of the administra­tion’s policies, like Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Florida Gov. Ron Desantis.

Senate Republican­s refused to consider Biden’s proposal of $ 106 billion in additional aid for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan unless it was accompanie­d by measures to cope with the border crisis. The administra­tion joined the negotiatio­ns, and, recognizin­g the issue’s political potency, Biden reversed his position and said he would enforce any measure that passed, including one authorizin­g him to shut the border if illegal crossings persist.

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer hopes for action soon on the measure being drafted by Oklahoma Republican James Langford, Connecticu­t Democrat Chris Murphy and Arizona Independen­t Kyrsten Sinema. It would substantia­lly tighten procedures for those seeking asylum and the officials handling their cases.

But there is no guarantee it will pass the Senate, let alone the House. Still, Senate Republican­s warned that, because of the administra­tion’s support, it’s the best chance in years to pass legislatio­n to deal with the border problem — if that’s their goal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States