The Denver Post

Muzzling and parading injured wolf through bar a brazen act of cruelty

- By Wendy Keefover Writer’s on the Range Wendy Keefover is a contributo­r to Writers on the Range, writers on the range. org, an independen­t nonprofit dedicated to spurring conversati­on about Western issues. She works for the Humane Society of the United St

It’s legal in Wyoming to chase coyotes and run over them with snowmobile­s, but recently, a man used his snowmobile to run down a wolf until it was disabled. Then he taped the wolf’s mouth shut and paraded the animal around a local bar, taking photos to commemorat­e the event. Finally, he killed the wolf.

According to news reports, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department fined the man $ 250. His only crime: possession of a live wild animal.

The more we learn, the worse this disturbing story gets. Most recently, one news outlet released video footage from the state game department showing the muzzled wolf splayed out on the bar floor.

The single upside to this incident is that it brought scrutiny to Wyoming’s bureaucrat­ic indifferen­ce to wolves and other wildlife.

We now know that the responsibl­e management agency can’t effectivel­y punish one of the worst acts of cruelty ever exposed in the state.

This failure stands out starkly when compared to neighborin­g Colorado, now hosting reintroduc­ed wolves. Although Colorado Parks and Wildlife reported recent wildlifera­ncher conflicts, two state agencies, are already working with those ranchers to prevent and mitigate losses and to provide generous compensati­on funds.

The new Born to be Wild specialty license plate has already generated more than $ 60,000 toward Colorado wildlife department’ s nonlethalc­onflict prevention fund for wolves.

If a wolf, bear or mountain lion causes a livestock loss, the producer is eligible for compensati­on, as in a case in early April, where wildlife staffers reported that wolves had killed two calves.

Most states have limits on “manner of take,” defined as what methods are permitted to kill wildlife. But in what Wyoming calls its “predator zone,” a whopping 85% of the state, wolves, coyotes, red foxes, raccoons, porcupines, jackrabbit­s and stray cats can be killed using any method.

Methods include hounding, baiting, neck snares, leg- hold traps, shooting wildlife from aircraft and M- 44 “cyanide bombs.”

This is all usually undertaken to protect sheep and cattle and grow mule- deer herds for hunters. But conservati­on biologists find otherwise.

We know that livestock losses attributab­le to wolves and other native carnivores are rare.

Recent reports have indicated that the Sublette County Sheriff’s office has opened an investigat­ion into the killing of the wolf, and we hope officials will move forward with new charges.

Meanwhile, “wildlife advocates in Wyoming, energized by the wolf torture allegation­s, plan to push for policy reform,” reports the news outlet Wyofile. In Wyoming now, it is legal and routine to pursue coyotes by running them down with snowmobile­s. The “sport” even has a name: “Chasin’ fur.”

The plight of wolves in Wyoming, along with those in Montana and Idaho where similar practices are allowed, highlights the need for increased protection­s for these animals.

On April 8, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was sued by several wildlife organizati­ons to restore protection­s for wolves in the Northern Rockies.

In the meantime, a case as shocking as this must never recur.

At the least, Wyoming lawmakers need to eliminate its predator zone and strengthen animal cruelty laws. In Colorado, wild animal or not, such an incident would be classified as “aggravated cruelty to animals.”

That is the decent thing to do for animals, and when we take into account the links between cruelty to animals and interperso­nal violence, we should see it as essential for a civil society as well.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States