The Denver Post

Bucking Trump, anti-abortion movement shows deep roots

- By Elizabeth Dias and Jack Healy

PHOENIX» Speaker Ben Toma walked off the floor of the Arizona House of Representa­tives, resolute — if stressed — after he cast the pivotal vote to again block an effort to repeal the state’s 1864 abortion ban.

He knew he was going against the wishes of top Republican­s like former President Donald Trump, who had called on the Legislatur­e to change the ban. He worried about political blowback to Republican­s in the coming elections.

But Toma saw himself as upholding moral principles far more foundation­al than current politics, the past president or even the ban itself. Attempts to undercut it as “a Civil-warera law” were “sort of ridiculous,” he said in an interview Wednesday after the vote. He pointed to the Constituti­on and Bill of Rights — and the Bible.

“Even all of our laws are actually based on, what, the Ten Commandmen­ts and the Book of Genesis, which are thousands of years ago,” he said. “The whole idea that we are equal in the sight of God, our maker, that we have unalienabl­e rights, all that — that is all fundamenta­lly a Christian worldview.”

This commitment to Arizona’s 1864 ban — a nearly total ban that the state Supreme Court recently reinstated — underscore­s the power of conservati­ve Christian opponents of abortion in shaping U.S. abortion laws, even as they represent a minority view. Despite a popular backlash against the Supreme Court’s decision overturnin­g a constituti­onal right to abortion in 2022, anti-abortion forces have maintained a stronghold in many state legislatur­es, not only in deeply conservati­ve states like Alabama but also closely divided ones like Arizona.

Backed by powerful local conservati­ve lobbyists and activists, their hold illustrate­s a dynamic of a postroe vs. Wade era: Even as they are losing political support from the top Republican in the country, Trump, they can stand firm in state legislatur­es that, because of the ruling striking down Roe, now have power to determine abortion law.

With the fight over the 1864 ban expected to continue consuming the Arizona

Capitol in the week ahead, politician­s and activists are clear about the biblical roots of their conviction­s. Toma, an immigrant from Romania, said his perspectiv­e on abortion was not simply shaped by religion, but also by fleeing communism as a child and rejecting a “utilitaria­n” view of humanity. He is now a nondenomin­ational Christian and said he came to his views through studying philosophy and bioethics in college.

“Not all the Republican­s obviously agree on every issue, and this is one that we disagree on, and I happen to think that abortion is wrong,” he said. “It comes down to: What do I think is right? What is just? What is ethical? And I have made my decision. And I am not going to change my mind.”

Calculated anti-abortion politickin­g has deep roots in Arizona. The Alliance Defending Freedom, the now-powerful conservati­ve Christian legal group that helped overturn Roe and is working to limit access to medication abortion, is based in Scottsdale. The firm started there in 1994, founded by a coalition of conservati­ve Christian leaders including James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family.

But anti-abortion leaders are increasing­ly at odds with Trump, who built ties with them that helped usher him to power in 2016 but who now has openly attacked their uncompromi­sing agenda amid growing political vulnerabil­ity.

A majority of Republican voters continue to oppose abortion. But the fight in Arizona reveals the fractures developing in the national and local Republican Party over abortion after the fall of Roe, and the urgency anti-abortion activists feel as the political foundation they relied on before Roe was overturned shifts.

The tension is evident in Toma’s own primary race for Congress, to fill an open seat left by retiring Republican Rep. Debbie Lesko, a longtime stalwart of the anti-abortion movement. In that crowded race, Trump has endorsed Abraham Hamadeh, who ran unsuccessf­ully for Arizona attorney general in 2022 and called the Arizona Supreme Court ruling upholding the 1864 law a political win for Democrats.

Groups like the Center for Arizona Policy and Arizona Right to Life have significan­t local clout and pushed Republican lawmakers in the days leading up to the potential repeal vote, urging lawmakers to prevent it from coming to the floor.

That pressure from emboldened conservati­ve Christian activists was palpable in the statehouse Wednesday, as they arrived early to claim nearly every seat in the gallery. Minutes before the session was about the begin, almost everyone rose, extended their hands toward the House floor below and loudly recited the Lord’s Prayer. A woman stood up and declared, “We have truth on our side.”

“Whose truth?” retorted one of the few abortion rights supporters who managed to get a seat. The crowd murmured back in disapprova­l.

Debi Vandenboom, a director at Arizona Women of Action, praised Toma and House Republican­s for defending the ban but said the state Senate had “betrayed women and the preborn” when it later introduced a bill to repeal the ban, with a couple of Republican­s joining Democrats.

A handful of Republican­s who represent moderate suburban districts or who reflect Arizona’s “Don’t Fence Me In” libertaria­n streak now find themselves increasing­ly at odds with unshakable opponents of abortion from their own party.

“Why is the government trying to force this lack of decision-making on women, based on a religious perspectiv­e?” asked Rep. David Cook, a cattle rancher from eastern Arizona. “I believe that life begins at conception; I really do. But I shouldn’t try to force my personal and religious beliefs.”

He voted with his fellow Republican­s to block the past two repeal efforts for procedural reasons but said he believed enough Republican­s would join with Democrats this coming week to undo the law, even as Toma did not see that outcome. Cook, a Catholic, said he wanted to add exceptions for rape and incest to an existing ban on abortions after 15 weeks that has been in place in Arizona since Roe vs. Wade was overturned.

The decision has been less wrenching for other religious conservati­ves like Sen. David Farnsworth, a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who said he is “100% pro-life” and equated abortion to murder. He voted to uphold the 1864 ban and said nothing would change his vote.

Rep. Neal Carter, a Republican, said many of his voters overwhelmi­ngly oppose the repeal effort. He said his opposition to abortion was not rooted in his faith, but more in his belief that a fetus was a human life that deserves legal protection and has constituti­onal rights.

“The real kernel of this is: A fetus is either a human being, or it’s not,” he said.

Arizona is home to a radical fringe of the movement against abortion rights that supports criminaliz­ing abortion from conception as homicide, based on an interpreta­tion of the Bible — a position that is out of step with national leaders and that in some states could make women who have the procedure eligible for the death penalty.

Some abortion rights opponents are now angry that prominent Republican­s like Trump and Kari Lake, a Trump ally running for Senate, were now racing to distance themselves from the 1864 ban. It allows abortion only to save a woman’s life and has no exceptions for rape or incest.

“If you’re going to claim to be pro-life, you have to be pro-life all the time, not just when it suits your political aims,” said Heather Litchfield, a regional coordinato­r for the anti-abortion rights group Students for Life of America.

On Friday morning, she and a dozen other staff members and volunteers with the group put on red Tshirts and headed out onto the front lines of Arizona’s abortion fight, to try to persuade voters not to support a proposed ballot measure to enshrine abortion rights in the state constituti­on, arguing it would allow abortion up to nine months.

The proposed amendment would prevent the state from restrictin­g abortion through fetal viability and allow abortions after viability to protect the patient’s “life or physical or mental health.”

As they walked through the suburban city of Mesa, the students said they were worried about the momentum behind the abortion measure and by the shifting attitudes of politician­s like Trump and Lake.

“It’s heartbreak­ing to see people abandon values they once held,” said Kaylee Stockton, who is studying nursing at Grand Canyon University, a prominent Arizona Christian college. “Their wavering isn’t bringing people over to their side.”

 ?? CASSIDY ARAIZA — THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Members of Students for Life of America canvass door-to-door to speak against a proposed ballot measure to enshrine abortion rights in the Arizona Constituti­on in Phoenix on Friday.
CASSIDY ARAIZA — THE NEW YORK TIMES Members of Students for Life of America canvass door-to-door to speak against a proposed ballot measure to enshrine abortion rights in the Arizona Constituti­on in Phoenix on Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States