The Desert Sun

Mass. bill would ban weaponizat­ion of robots

- Kinga Borondy

BOSTON – It was a special “dog” that captured the attention of legislator­s, state workers and even tourists at the Massachuse­tts State House on Thursday. It responded to commands: Stay! Go! And even Down! But the commands were sent electronic­ally through a joystick and the dog, dubbed Spot, was robotic.

A flame-throwing robotic dog, like the Thermonato­r for sale to the general public for $9,500, it was not.

The robot dog, created by Boston Dynamics, was at the State House to encourage legislator­s to support a bill that would prohibit the weaponizat­ion of robots. Sponsored by Sen. Michael Moore, D-Millbury and Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa, D-Northampto­n, the bill advocates for the responsibl­e, ethical and safe use of advanced robotic technology.

Among other things, the bill would make it illegal for anyone, including a law enforcemen­t agent, to manufactur­e, modify, sell, transfer or operate a robotic device or drone that is equipped with a weapon, or to use such a device to physically restrain a person.

“We have an ethics policy,” said David Robert, director of human/robot interactio­n for Boston Dynamics, the maker of Spot. “We are creating robots to be friendly and useful, not harm or hurt people or animals.”

The Boston Dynamics device has been sold in 40 different countries. Its primary use is to replace humans in tedious or dangerous tasks, such as disposing of explosive or suspected explosive devices.

The New York City Fire Department has one, dubbed Bergh, after the founder of the ASPCA, and it is painted to look like a Dalmatian.

The device is teachable, Robert said, explaining that Spot can be taught, or programmed, to perform tasks without human supervisio­n. It can record a route or a sequence of events and perform those without supervisio­n as well.

“The robot is doing the work automatica­lly but with the ability to have a human override its program,” Robert said.

Transparen­cy is part of the company’s philosophy. The device is not encased in a furry substance, does not have a head or a tail, and doesn’t even really look like a dog. That’s on purpose, Robert said, explaining that the company’s aim is to create public trust with robotic devices in anticipati­on of them being in people’s homes.

The Spot at the State House was fitted with a retractabl­e lever that functions similar to a hand. Other devices that can be attached including mapping tools, cameras and at the shop employees have created a margarita mixer attachment.

“That’s the fun part,” Robert said. While Spot is meant for human assistance, the aforementi­oned Thermonato­r may be exactly why Massachuse­tts is considerin­g banning the weaponizat­ion of robots. That dog’s bark may or may not be worse than its bite, but its breath definitely tops both.

Throwflame, a company out of Cleveland, has combined its ARC Flamethrow­er with a robotic dog to create the Thermonato­r.

 ?? KINGA BORONDY/WORCESTER TELEGRAM & GAZETTE ?? “We have an ethics policy,” said David Robert, director of human/robot interactio­n for Boston Dynamics, the maker of Spot. “We are creating robots to be friendly and useful, not harm or hurt people or animals.”
KINGA BORONDY/WORCESTER TELEGRAM & GAZETTE “We have an ethics policy,” said David Robert, director of human/robot interactio­n for Boston Dynamics, the maker of Spot. “We are creating robots to be friendly and useful, not harm or hurt people or animals.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States