The Evening Leader

To Your Good Health

- Dr. Keith Roach, M.D.

DEAR DR. ROACH: I am 68 and have prostate cancer. I had PSAs, an MRI and a biopsy. My Gleason score was a high 7. No genetic testing as I can recall. My urologist said I had “upper moderate” cancer and that I could remove my prostate or do radiation therapy. I underwent three months of radiation treatment from September to November 2020. I’ve done three PSA tests since the radiation. All have been very low and, per my doc, good.

I don’t specifical­ly recall my doctor making any reference to my having a rather slow cancer or more aggressive cancer. How can I determine this for my situation? — T.P.

ANSWER: There are factors that can help predict whether a prostate cancer will be aggressive. The most useful of these are the size of the tumor (and whether any lymph nodes are involved); the PSA level and Gleason score; and the molecular characteri­stics of the tumor. The last comes from DNA testing of the tumor. Since I don’t know the size and you didn’t have any molecular tests, the best informatio­n I can give is that you have a Gleason score of 7 and apparently no positive lymph nodes or distant disease. This would put you, as your urologist said, into an intermedia­te risk group. Without having the details from the pathology report, I can only give a rough estimate, but the best guess is that between 65% and 83% of men like you would continue to be free from prostate cancer five years after diagnosis. However, there are some additional good findings since your treatment, especially that your PSA levels are staying low. Only after years can we know for sure about the aggressive­ness of your cancer, but from what you are telling me, your prognosis is pretty good. Your urologist has all the informatio­n to give you the best estimate, and should give you more informatio­n if you tell them you want it.

DEAR DR. ROACH: Are vibrating machines safe? Only after buying a used one did I go online to find out more about them. I read they can cause brain damage and neurologic­al damage, possibly permanent. My machine now sits in the garage while I learn what its fate should be. If it is dangerous, it should be destroyed, not passed on to another unwitting buyer. — T.H.

ANSWER: The theory of whole-body vibration machines makes some sense — your body attempts to stabilize you against the vibration, making muscles stronger with less perceived effort. Understand­ing the science on them, however, takes some judgment.

There are studies that show increased strength among users (compared with before using) and improved weight loss (in conjunctio­n with dietary changes). In the studies I read, I did not find reports of significan­t adverse effects. The follow-up duration in these studies is short enough that there may indeed by adverse effects that could become apparent only after prolonged use.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States