Best way to improve California’s water situation is Newsom’s plan, not SB 1
Creating a sustainable water future for all Californians is one of the defining challenges of our time. As members of Congress from California, we have been at the center of efforts to solve the difficult problems of providing reliable water supplies for California’s people, its economy, and our environment.
There is no silver bullet to that will solve these problems, but what we know is this: all parties must be at the table; the legislative process must be transparent; the goals must be clear and achievable.
California has an incredible opportunity to achieve what has seemed out of reach for so long: responsibly providing safe, reliable, and adequate water supplies for nearly 40 million Californians; water for California farmland that produces almost half of the nation’s fresh
fruits, nuts and vegetables; and water for native fish and wildlife. The delivery of Delta water is critical to San Joaquin Valley communities that suffer from dry wells and poor water quality.
In fact, the San Joaquin Valley is home to half of all community water systems in California that lack access to clean drinking water.
We applaud Gov. Gavin Newsom’s efforts in leading discussions with the Department of the Interior, public water agencies and environmental groups to craft voluntary agreements that will restore the ecological health of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta while providing California with clean, reliable water.
Additionally, the state and federal administrations are working cooperatively to update biological opinions issued under the federal Endangered Species Act for the coordinated operations of the California State Water Project and the federal Central Valley Project. The current biological opinions were issued a decade ago. It is time to update them to incorporate the new science and adaptive
management approach that has been developed in the years since and that served as the basis for the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act, bipartisan legislation approved by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama in December 2016.
Evidence suggests that the new biological opinions being developed by the federal fishery agencies could provide greater protection for Delta smelt, Chinook salmon, and other anadromous fish than the existing biological opinions, issued in 2008 and 2009. For instance, under the new biological opinions, Shasta Reservoir will be operated to provide more cold water to protect winter run Chinook salmon that spawn below Shasta Dam.
Blowing up this process by enacting the Endangered Species Act provisions of Senate Bill 1 would likely result in the major parties walking away from the governor’s collaborative process. Instead of working together, we’ll return to the status quo of conflict resolution by lawsuit. Clearly this would be a step backward to solving our longterm water issues.
Unless SB 1 is amended, it would codify in state law the outdated 2008 and 2009 biological opinions, which should be replaced with a new biological opinion that utilizes the latest data and methods. Additionally, SB 1 attempts to apply the state Endangered Species Act to operations of the federal Central Valley Project, which has been a historical point of legal contention. This could result in litigation that extends beyond the Trump administration, regardless of the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. From our experience, litigation in the water world does not resolve California’s longterm water challenges.
We absolutely support SB 1’s objective, which is to ensure that the Trump administration does not roll back regulatory protections for quality health care, immigration, fair labor, clean air, clean water, and at-risk fish and wildlife species. But unless amended, the unintended consequences of SB 1 will surely frustrate Gov. Newsom’s efforts to reach solutions through collaboration and engagement with all participating parties.
Efforts to meet all of California’s water demands present complex issues that don’t lend themselves well to sound bites. The future management of California’s water system demands that we incorporate the best available science in making operational decisions that impact water supplies for California’s people and its environment.
The voluntary agreements being advanced by Gov. Newsom’s administration and new biological opinions that provide greater operational flexibility and better protection for at-risk species are positive steps toward responsible water policy. SB 1, in its present form, is a step backward. This measure can, and should, be fixed.
Rep. Jim Costa
Rep. TJ Cox
The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is not a true delta, a place where a river fans out as it spills into the sea. Instead it’s an estuary, an inland water body where ocean and fresh flows mingle, one of the world’s richest ecosystem types. At 1,300 square miles it is about the size of Rhode Island and has 1,100 miles of levees.