The Guardian (USA)

We must study marijuana's impact on the environmen­t before it's too late

- Vince Palace

In a flurry of internatio­nal news, after years of false starts and political wrangling, it was finally written into law: Justin Trudeau’s administra­tion legalized recreation­al marijuana use in Canada. Admittedly, the course of true legalizati­on never did run smooth. A myriad of complex province-specific regulation­s and policies have emerged that have served to reflect the fractured political nature of Canada’s federation, but also to mildly puzzle its citizens.

Much of the informatio­n that had been shared ahead of the big day was intended to clear up some of the public’s confusion focused on the human health risks of cannabis consumptio­n. Billboards and advertisin­g in suitably green font have warned Toronto and Vancouver’s denizens of how smoking marijuana can impair one’s ability to drive, trigger schizophre­nia and other mental health issues, and stoke addiction.

While all admirable and necessary warnings, this focus on human health has highlighte­d the notable lack of public or government­al discussion on the potential impact of cannabis on the environmen­t, and in particular on

North America’s abundant supplies of fresh water.

Often featuring in the lower rungs of priority when it comes to determinin­g the safety of a drug, the impact of a pharmaceut­ical on the freshwater environmen­t can be significan­t on the health of lakes, rivers and those who reside nearby.

The gamut is wide and worrying – from limpets in the UK no longer able to cling on to rocks for survival as they “bathe in a soup” of antidepres­sants to Canadian male fish growing eggs in their testes after being exposed to the synthetic estrogen found in birth control pills.

These examples should serve as a reminder that when deeming a drug fit for market, we should research and factor in its impact on the environmen­t and water systems.

As the tide of marijuana legalizati­on seems to be steadily sweeping North America, it also highlights how the USA and Canada, with our shared watersheds and borderless water movement, need to put our heads together on this issue.

When it comes to marijuana, a lot of the research and legislatio­n is patchy and regionally specific. In Canada, some legislatio­n exists to limit the use of more than 95 pesticides that can be used by licensed cannabis producers. There is also guidance to prevent these compounds from leeching into nearby water bodies and reaching its flora and fauna.

But we need to know more.

It’s hard to overstate the importance of fresh water to North America’s economy and peoples. The five mammoth Great Lakes alone account for 21% of the globe’s freshwater supplies and no fewer than 35 million Americans and Canadians depend on them for their drinking water.

Historical­ly, economic developmen­t of the continent has depended on its networks of lakes and rivers, and today it provides places to swim, fish for food, and boat – helping to fuel economic activity in the recreation and tourism industry. Put simply, every economic sector in North American depends on fresh water.

We are still limited in our understand­ing of how much recreation­al use of cannabis in Canada will increase thanks to legalizati­on. Some projection­s suggest a steep increase, but we need to be tracking consumptio­n to know what could be leeching into our water.

Second, when cannabis itself is metabolize­d by humans and excreted into our water supplies, it can result in risks that are yet poorly understood and that are not accounted for when just applied pesticides are examined. We need more research to fill those informatio­n gaps.

Our water flows freely across our continent; cannabis flowing down from British Columbia will not stop short at the border with Idaho.

North America’s government­s, scientists and industry need to work together to ensure a comprehens­ive understand­ing of the effects of marijuana on fresh water, and update wastewater treatment facilities and regulation­s to protect our lakes and rivers.

 ??  ?? ‘We are still limited in our understand­ing of how much recreation­al use of cannabis in Canada will increase thanks to legalizati­on.’ Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters
‘We are still limited in our understand­ing of how much recreation­al use of cannabis in Canada will increase thanks to legalizati­on.’ Photograph: Carlos Osorio/Reuters
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? ‘When it comes to marijuana, a lot of the research and legislatio­n is patchy and regionally specific.’ Photograph: Chris Wattie/ Reuters
‘When it comes to marijuana, a lot of the research and legislatio­n is patchy and regionally specific.’ Photograph: Chris Wattie/ Reuters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States