The Guardian (USA)

From 'rice bunny' to 'back up the car': China's year of censorship

- Lily Kuo

China stepped up its campaign in 2018 to control what news and informatio­n its citizens can see. While censors continued heavyhande­d control for any content deemed dangerous for social stability, including Peppa Pig videos and the letter “n”, regulators also deployed more sophistica­ted methods, going beyond Chinese social media and working harder to curate and shape what Chinese residents consume.

Authoritie­s have been forcing activists on Twitter to delete their accounts and shutting down the social media accounts of university professors. Apolitical content is coming under more scrutiny. In October, almost 10,000 social media accounts for outlets publishing entertainm­ent and celebrity news were closed.

The country’s largest internet companies have also stepped up selfcensor­ship. The messaging platform WeChat issued a statement in November, promising to step up its policing of “politicall­y harmful informatio­n” while in April, the boss of Jinri Toutiao, a content aggregator, issued a public apology more similar to self-criticisms in Mao Zedong’s era.

WeChat groups were regularly shut down and users sending messages to friends often found themselves the victim of censorship when their messages appear not to go through.

“WeChat group takedowns and news item deletions are happening

with greater regularity across a shifting slate of topics,” said Rui Zhong, a programme assistant at the Kissinger Institute on China.

These were some of the banned phrases this year:

‘Amend the constituti­on’

At the March annual meeting of China’s national legislatur­e, lawmakers voted almost unanimousl­y to abolish term limits for the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, allowing him to stay in power indefinite­ly.

In the leadup to the meeting and afterwards, phrases like “amend the constituti­on”, “I don’t agree”, “proclaimin­g oneself emperor” and the letter “n” were censored. “Emigration” and “Winnie the Pooh”, a reference to Xi that has been censored off and on over the years, was also blocked.

‘Back up the car’

In September, Chinese economist Wu Xiaoping released a controvers­ial commentary arguing that the utility of the country’s private sector had been exhausted and such companies should now step aside.

Commentato­rs quickly criticised Wu’s proposal as “driving history backwards” to a time of a command economy. As a result, the term “back up the car” was also censored.

In addition to domestic issues, Chinese regulators also tried to limit how much the US-China trade war was discussed, and censored certain types of articles and comments on US vice-president Mike Pence’s polemical speech on China, and the arrest of senior Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou.

“Censorship focus shifted from local issues to China’s global image, foreign affairs and economy,” said King-wa Fu, head of Weiboscope and WeChatscop­e at Hong Kong University’s School of Journalism and media studies, a project analysing Chinese censorship. ‘Rice bunny’

In January, a woman named Luo Xixi published allegation­s against a professor who forced himself on her when she was a student 12 years ago. Inspired by her account and the subsequent firing of the professor, other women began posting under the hashtag #MeToo or in Chinese version, woyeshi #ը໷੍ .

When that phrase was censored, internet users began using a homonym mitu#ธၶ or “rice bunny’. That too was blocked. Still the movement expanded and has led to revelation­s against professors, journalist­s, heads of NGOs, the head of a large Buddhist monastery and a well-known CCTV host. ‘Quangong carbon leakage’ In November, officials in Quanggang in the southern Fujian province reported a spillage of C9, a crude oil that is toxic to humans, off the coast of Fujian.

Local residents posted photos and accounts online of residents being sent to the hospital, arguing that the leak was more serious than officials claimed. Internet searches for “Xiamen Quangong carbon leakage” were blocked and video and posts related to the spill were deleted.

Officials initially reported that only seven tonnes of the chemical were dumped into the water. At a press conference later that month authoritie­s admitted that almost 70 tonnes had been spilled.

 ??  ?? Social media companies have helped the internet crackdown, promising to police ‘harmful informatio­n’. Illustrati­on: Getty/Guardian Design Team
Social media companies have helped the internet crackdown, promising to police ‘harmful informatio­n’. Illustrati­on: Getty/Guardian Design Team

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States