The Guardian (USA)

Mueller stopped short of calling Trump a criminal, but did we need him to?

- Richard Wolffe

Did Donald Trump repeatedly break the law by trying to block multiple investigat­ions into his mysterious­ly intimate relationsh­ip with Russia? The answer is rather similar to questions about the pope’s Catholicis­m and the propensity of bears to poop in the woods.

It’s not the one you’ll find hanging from a presidenti­al lectern, screaming about NO obstructio­n and NO collusion.

But it is the one you’ll find in a rather long report by a certain special counsel, counting the many ways

in which the president of the United States obstructed justice. To be precise, there were at least 10 instances of obstructio­n detailed in Robert Mueller’s magnum opus.

In the immortal words of Spandau Ballet, Mueller found it so hard to write the next line. Even though he knows this much is true: any non-president would have long ago faced indictment for obstructio­n of justice.

Mueller himself again stopped one inch short of saying “Trump is a criminal” in his rare comments to the press on Wednesday: “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”

Instead, Mueller decided he was not the right person to decide to do the right thing.

Which brings us to the latest news from Michael Wolff about Mueller drawing up an indictment on three counts of obstructio­n of justice. While the Guardian has seen the indictment document in question, Mueller’s office denies flat out that it exists.

This is problemati­c and entirely predictabl­e on so many levels.

The world was only too happy to devour Wolff’s Fire and Fury because it was all so delightful­ly plausible. Who cares if Rupert Murdoch truly called Trump “a fucking idiot” or if economic adviser Gary Cohn actually called him “dumb as shit”? Back in the distant days of early 2018, it all seemed so cathartica­lly, chaoticall­y close to the truth.

Today that’s not the case. We have a higher and lower standard for our public discourse. The lower standard is obvious to anyone with a pulse and access to the news media: we have been bludgeoned into chewing a daily diet of presidenti­al deceit, mindless trashtalki­ng and the abuse of minorities. Those lower standards have spread like measles through a Republican establishm­ent that is as cowardly as it is selfservin­g. It takes so much more to shock us when our sensibilit­ies are on life support.

At the same time, we have far higher standards and expectatio­ns. The House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, is running rings around a petulant president, calling for a family interventi­on to save him and the country, while more than 20 Democratic candidates debate what it really takes to lead the United States.

The debate about indicting or impeaching Trump will take more than Mueller’s input – as testimony on Capitol Hill or as snippets from a new book – to move forward. It requires a shift in our politics, which is already moving rapidly towards election year. Whether you support formal impeachmen­t or not, the full uncovering of Trump’s corruption will require congressio­nal investigat­ion between now and November 2020.

More than ever, American voters need to consider the qualities of leadership they want for the next four years, and Mueller has already fulfilled his job in exposing what Trump’s version of

the presidency looks like: an endless number of ways to look after himself, regardless of the law, morals or even ideology.

According to the new book, Trump believed his accountant, Allen Weisselber­g, would turn on him – under pressure from Mueller – because “the Jews always flip”. This is, appropriat­ely enough, a bit rich coming from both Wolff and Trump.

Trump himself had no problem flipping on his lawyer and henchman Michael Cohen, who flipped on him when Trump flipped first. Wolff has built an entire career on flipping on his subjects, including one Rupert Murdoch who somehow got the impression that Wolff was writing a glowing tribute of a biography. Steve Bannon, Wolff’s greatest source in Trumplandi­a, flipped on everyone before Trump flipped on him. This is surely a bonfire of flipping vanities.

Wolff has previously noted that Trump knows who is Jewish “in a way that feels creepy”. There are few things about Trump that aren’t creepy, and there are few ways to propagate antisemiti­c conspiraci­es that also aren’t creepy.

But we’re talking about the same creepy Trump who is still trying to justify gushing over those neo-Nazis in Charlottes­ville. The same creepy Trump who wishes he could date his own daughter, who happened to marry into the Jewish tradition. The same creepy Trump whose creepy climate denier compared the “demonizati­on of carbon dioxide” to the “demonizati­on of the poor Jews under Hitler”.

Like so many grifters, Trump has found company in a community of like-minded braggarts, hype-merchants, conmen and plain old crooks. There was the Environmen­tal Protection Agency boss who got a cheap Capitol Hill sub-lease from a couple of lobbyists, for the rare nights when he wasn’t jetting home at taxpayers’ expense to Oklahoma. There’s the commerce secretary who lied about divesting stocks to avoid any conflict of interest, and there’s the transporta­tion secretary who did the same.

Who knows or cares if Bannon is making up stuff to inflate his own pneumatic sense of white nationalis­t supremacy? Who knows or cares if Trump’s latest tweets can survive another two hours of him watching Fox News?

“I had nothing to do with Russia helping get me elected,” Trump tweeted on Thursday, before someone pointed out to him that he had just copped to collusion. He promptly deleted his own signed confession, but the damage was done.

That’s the problem with Trump and all the little Trumps who gather round him. They always flip.

Mueller has already exposed what Trump’s version of the presidency looks like: an endless number of ways to look after himself

 ??  ??
 ?? Photograph: Evan Vucci/AP ?? ‘Whether you support formal impeachmen­t or not, the full uncovering of Trump’s corruption will require congressio­nal investigat­ion between now and November 2020.’
Photograph: Evan Vucci/AP ‘Whether you support formal impeachmen­t or not, the full uncovering of Trump’s corruption will require congressio­nal investigat­ion between now and November 2020.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States