The Guardian (USA)

Moth trapping helps conservati­on efforts

- Letters

Suzanna van Moyland misses the scientific point when she criticises moth trapping (Letters, 27 July). If we are to overturn the significan­t decline in moth numbers, we need to understand what is still out there.

It is not just a matter of seeing the odd moth. We need to know numbers, species, locations and time of year, and we need to know them year in, year out. This enables us to track changes in the size and location of population­s, and provides necessary evidence for targeted conservati­on efforts. Unfortunat­ely most moths fly by night so the counting methods used for butterflie­s are not available.

Successful conservati­on requires the sustained science provided by the many moth trappers who routinely catch, photograph, identify and release. It is not helped by well-meaning anthropomo­rphism. Simon Rush all-Worcester, Worcesters­hire

• If you care about conserving these species, moths require more understand­ing and monitoring, not to be “left alone”. The original article (Country diary, Journal, 20 July) did not explain the process or the steps to take to avoid harming their catch, but responsibl­e trappers would take these steps. So, please, trap moths but only do so after understand­ing why and how to do it.

Take precaution­s to ensure your moths are released alive, learn to identify your moths correctly, and always share accurate data with your county recorder, so that the collective efforts of moth trappers around the country can record species ranges, range shifts and declines to produce evidence-based conservati­on strategies.

One article won’t produce an army of careless, harmful moth trappers, but it might spark the interest of future conservati­onists. So a plea – be curious and learn about nature so that we can better protect it.Dr Kate Durrant-Beeston, Nottingham­shire

• Join the debate – emailguard­ian.letters@theguardia­n.co m

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visitgu.com/letters

• Do you have a photo you’d like to share with Guardian readers? Click hereto upload it and we’ll publish the best submission­s in the letters spread of our print edition

 ?? Photograph: Getty ?? An elephant hawk-moth. Simon Rushall argues that successful conservati­on is ‘not helped by well-meaning anthropomo­rphism’.
Photograph: Getty An elephant hawk-moth. Simon Rushall argues that successful conservati­on is ‘not helped by well-meaning anthropomo­rphism’.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States