The Guardian (USA)

Kashmir: India’s ‘draconian’ blackout sets worrying precedent, warns UN

- Rebecca Ratcliffe in Delhi

The unpreceden­ted communicat­ions blackout imposed on Indian-administer­ed Kashmir could signal a departure in the way in which democratic states clamp down on informatio­n in contentiou­s areas, the UN’s special rapporteur on freedom of expression, David Kaye, has said.

India’s Hindu nationalis­t prime minister, Narendra Modi, made his first public statement on Thursday since the decision to remove Kashmir’s special status, describing it as the start of a “new era” that will help end decades of terrorism and separatism.

Kaye told the Guardian: “There’s something about this shutdown that is draconian in a way other shutdowns usually are not.”

The territory faces its fifth day in a lockdown imposed hours before the Indian government revoked Kashmir’s special status, stripping away the autonomy it was granted in exchange for joining the Indian union after independen­ce in 1947.

Communicat­ions are often blocked in Indian-administer­ed Kashmir, but the current clampdown is unpreceden­ted in a time of relative peace. Unlike previous instances, landline phones and cable TV have been cut off. A strict curfew also means people are unable to leave their homes during the day, while only limited movement has been allowed at night.

“I can’t recall a situation where there has been a total blackout of not only the two-way, multi-point communicat­ion systems that we are familiar with now – anything on the internet, WhatsApp etc – but also the one-direction communicat­ions like TV,” Kaye said.

“That’s pretty extensive and one of my concerns would be – in part because this is happening in a democratic state – it could be seen as a new departure for many states that are thinking about how to clamp down on the flow of informatio­n.”

He added that it was hard to identify a set of circumstan­ces where a country shutting down access to the internet, especially for an extensive period of time, was legal under internatio­nal law.

Before the announceme­nt on Monday, thousands of extra troops were deployed to Kashmir, where the government is likely to face major opposition. An insurgency against Indian rule has been waged for decades, and tens of thousands of people have been killed in the conflict. Despite a heavy security presence and strict curfew, protests have occurred.

The restrictio­ns have prevented people from calling for ambulances, accessing informatio­n or checking on family members. On Thursday, an opposition activist filed a petition in India’s highest court challengin­g the security lockdown and communicat­ions block.

In his first address to the nation since parliament was told article 370 – the part of the constituti­on guaranteei­ng Jammu and Kashmir special status – had been revoked, Modi described the changes as historic and attempted to assure residents the situation would soon become normal.

“The scrapping of article 370 is the beginning of a new era,” Modi said. Kashmir’s special status had been used by Pakistan “as a weapon to incite people of the region against India”, but now India would rid the region of “terrorism and terrorists”, he added. “There will be a lot of developmen­t,” Modi said. “All the citizens will be given their rights.”

Modi said the “mainstream­ing” of the Kashmiri people with the rest of the nation would expedite developmen­t and create new jobs with investment from public and private companies, and even suggested a cinema industry could flourish. “I think the whole world will come and shoot their films there,” he said. “[This will] bring employment for the people there.”

In other developmen­ts on Thursday, the state-run All India Radio reported more than 500 people had been arrested since the clampdown began, and Pakistan had suspended a key rail service with India and banned the screening of Indian films.

A Pakistani foreign ministry spokesman also said authoritie­s were considerin­g approachin­g the internatio­nal court of justice for a case against India. The two countries have fought two of their three wars over control of Kashmir.

Indian-administer­ed Kashmir has had a special status since 1954, giving it a degree of autonomy including its own constituti­on, as well as rules that prevented people from outside the state from buying land in the territory. Many Kashmiris believe this is crucial to protecting the demography and traditions of India’s only Muslim-majority state. Delhi has insisted the ending of auton

omy for the region is an internal matter.

On Wednesday, one man arriving at Delhi’s airport from Srinagar, Kashmir’s biggest city, described the state as being “like a prison”. Soayib Qureshi, a Delhibased lawyer who arrived on the same day, said he had been given a handwritte­n boarding pass for the flight because this report systems were down.

 ??  ?? Indian security forces guard a street in Srinagar, Kashmir, where movement has been restricted. Photograph: Saqib Mugloo/AFP/Getty Images
Indian security forces guard a street in Srinagar, Kashmir, where movement has been restricted. Photograph: Saqib Mugloo/AFP/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States