'Neural revolution': Royal Society calls for inquiry into new wave of brain implants
Society must prepare for a technological revolution in which brain implants allow people to communicate by telepathy, download new skills, and brag about their holidays in “neural postcards”, leading scientists say.
While such far-fetched applications remain fiction for now, research into brain implants and other neural devices is advancing so fast that the Royal Society has called for a “national investigation” into the technology.
“In 10 years’ time this is probably going to touch millions of people,” said Tim Constandinou, director of the next generation neural interfaces lab at Imperial College London, and co-chair of a new Royal Society report called iHuman. “These technologies are not possible today, but we are heading in that direction.”
The report foresees a “neural revolution” driven by electronic implants that communicate directly with the brain and other parts of the nervous system. By 2040, the scientists anticipate that implants will help the paralysed to walk, with other devices alleviating the symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases and treatmentresistant depression.
The new wave of devices will go beyond existing products such as cochlear implant hearing aids and deep brain stimulators for people with Parkinson’s disease, with gadgets that help the healthy. In research labs, scientists are working on ways for people to type with their brains, and share thoughts by connecting their minds. Other teams are developing helmets and headbands to speed up learning and improve memory.
“People could become telepathic to some degree, able to converse not only without speaking but without words, through access to each other’s thoughts at a conceptual level. This could enable unprecedented collaboration with colleagues and deeper conversations with friends,” the report states.
But with such new powers come new risks, the report adds. Expensive brain-boosting devices may become luxury items in richer nations, leaving poorer countries behind. And with devices plugged directly into the brain, people’s most intimate data could be used against them. “Access to people’s thoughts, moods and motivations could lead to abuse of human rights,” the report says, adding that some companies might expect their employees to wear devices that reveal their inner feelings.
The report calls for the public to be consulted “early and often” about the ethical issues that neural implants throw up, and proposes a regulatory body akin to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) to police how new devices are used.
“As our experience with social media has shown, we do need to think ahead about who will control this data and what it might be used for, to guard against possible harmful uses,” said Sarah Chan, a co-author on the report at Edinburgh University. “If recent experience has shown us anything, it’s that individual consent and opting in or out is not enough to protect either indi
viduals or society more widely.”
But Constandinou warned against overregulation that could cripple new technologies before they leave the lab. “We need safeguards to ensure things are not misused, but we shouldn’t shoot ourselves in the foot,” he said. “This technology could massively improve the quality of life for millions of people,” he added.