The Guardian (USA)

Kamala Harris urges Twitter to suspend Trump over 'civil war' tweets

- Kari Paul in San Francisco

The Democratic presidenti­al candidate Kamala Harris has called on Twitter to suspend Donald Trump’s account over his tweets suggesting the US would erupt into civil war if he were impeached.

In a letter addressed to Twitter’s CEO, Jack Dorsey, on Wednesday, Harris referenced six tweets from Trump’s account she said violated the site’s terms that users “may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone or incite other people to do so”.

The president’s tweets, which drew widespread condemnati­on this week, have targeted the whistleblo­wer who exposed Trump’s dealings with Ukraine, accusing the person of being a “spy” who may have committed treason. Others quoted threats of a “civil war” that would break out if he were impeached.

Harris, a California senator, wrote: “No user, regardless of their job, wealth, or stature should be exempt from abiding by Twitter’s user agreement, not even the President of the United States.”

Trump’s rhetoric on the social network, where he has more than 65 million followers, has long been controvers­ial – but this week it has proved especially divisive, in the wake of the House impeachmen­t inquiry.

It’s not the first time Twitter has faced calls to censor Trump, but it has defended its position by saying these rules are more lenient for conversati­ons that are “in the public interest”. In June, it announced a new feature under which tweets from politician­s and others deemed as meeting a standard of “public interest” would remain on the platform even if they violated Twitter rules. The “public interest” feature only applies to verified accounts of elected officials with more than 100,000 followers.

But tweets from non-political accounts have also come under fire after Twitter failed to censor them in recent days. Tweets from the radical antigovern­ment group the Oath Keepers suggesting civil war remained live on the account more than 24 hours later despite many users saying they were reporting them to Twitter’s safety team.

“This is where we are,” one tweet read. “We ARE on the verge of a HOT civil war. Like in 1859. That’s where we are. And the Right has ZERO trust or respect for anything the left is doing. We see THEM as illegitima­te too.”

Oath Keepers is an extremist group that claims to have tens of thousands of former and present law enforcemen­t officials as members, according to the anti-hate organizati­on the Southern Poverty Law Center, which says “the entire organizati­on is based on a set of baseless conspiracy theories about the federal government working to destroy the liberties of Americans”.

The tweets apparently did not violate Twitter’s terms of service agree

ment, under which communicat­ions that promote violent extremism are not allowed.

“I can’t believe I have to say this, but a heavily armed extremist group tweeting out threats of war and violence is a credible threat,” Nandini Jammi of the social media activism organizati­on Sleeping Giants said. “The fact that they’ve decided to leave the tweet up without providing an explanatio­n suggests that they’ve made a decision they’re unable to justify. In that case, why even bother having a terms of service?”

Other platforms are also struggling to regulate such conversati­ons. In September, Facebook’s vice-president Nick Clegg announced the platform would be giving politician­s more freedom than other users regarding hate speech – a decision that many people, including a former Facebook employee who wrote the platform’s content rules – have questioned.

Platforms have started policing some controvers­ial accounts in the past year. In May, Facebook removed prominent accounts promoting white nationalis­m, including the far-right figures Milo Yiannopoul­os, Alex Jones and Laura Loomer. Twitter has removed Alex Jones and Martin Shkreli for spreading hate and misinforma­tion in the past.

“Others have had their accounts suspended for less offensive behavior,” Harris wrote. “And when this kind of abuse is being spewed from the most powerful office in the United States, the stakes are too high to do nothing.”

Twitter did not immediatel­y offer a response to the letter from Harris.

 ?? Photograph: Meg Kinnard/AP ?? Kamala Harris said the tweets violated terms barring targeted harassment.
Photograph: Meg Kinnard/AP Kamala Harris said the tweets violated terms barring targeted harassment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States