The Guardian (USA)

Exxon sowed doubt about climate crisis, House Democrats hear in testimony

- Emily Holden in Washington

House Democrats on Wednesday laid out four decades of evidence that oil behemoth Exxon knew since the 1970s that the burning of fossil fuels was heating the planet and intentiona­lly sowed doubt about the climate crisis.

The testimony came in a hearing in a House oversight subcommitt­ee on civil rights just a day after ExxonMobil began a trial in New York City over misleading investors on the business risks from government rules meant to address the climate crisis.

Exxon’s role in hiding the mounting emergency has been widely publicized for four years, since the publicatio­n of an investigat­ion by InsideClim­ate News, the Los Angeles Times and the Columbia Journalism School. Court proceeding­s and additional reporting have found more proof of Exxon’s longtime knowledge of the problem.

“What they did was wrong. They spread doubt about the dangers of climate change,” testified Martin Hoffert, who was a scientist consultant for Exxon Research and Engineerin­g in the 1980s. “The effect of this disinforma­tion was to delay action internally and externally … As a result, in my opinion, homes and livelihood­s will likely be destroyed and lives lost.”

ExxonMobil is one of the top 20 companies responsibl­e for a third of carbon dioxide emissions since 1965, an investigat­ion by the Guardian has revealed.

Hoffert testified that in 1982, Exxon scientists predicted how carbon dioxide levels would rise and heat the planet as humans burned more and more fossil fuels.

The New York congresswo­man Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has advocated for a Green New Deal to fight global heating, called the projection­s from that time “startlingl­y accurate”.

“In 1982, seven years before I was even born, Exxon accurately predicted that by this year, 2019, the Earth would hit a carbon dioxide concentrat­ion of 415 parts per million and a temperatur­e increase of 1C. Dr Hoffert, is that correct?”

“We were excellent scientists,” Hoffert said to laughter from the audience.

“Yes you were, yes you were,” Ocasio-Cortez responded. “So they knew.”

After the hearing, Hoffert lamented that Exxon could have taken a different path, merging its knowledge of the climate crisis with its science on battery storage that will be critical to shifting away from fossil fuels. “They could have initiated a huge program” Hoffert said.

Lawmakers heard from other experts and lawyers, including another former Exxon scientist.

Republican­s invited one witness, a lawyer who was a political appointee to Trump’s Environmen­tal Protection Agency (EPA), which has rescinded all US efforts to reduce heat-trapping pollution.

The lawyer, Mandy Gunasekara, works with a pro-fossil fuel group associated with the Texas Public Policy Foundation, which OcasioCort­ez pointed out is funded by the conservati­ve billionair­e Koch brothers, who are invested in fossil energy. Gunasekara testified that the hearing is part of a “politicall­y-motivated campaign” to smear an entire industry and argued any warming will be manageable.

Exxon and other oil companies did not participat­e in the hearing.

Republican­s on the subcommitt­ee insisted that fossil fuels are essential to powering the US and lifting people out of poverty worldwide.

Scientists have found the opposite: that the escalating crisis caused largely by those fossil fuels will force millions into poverty, through droughts that trigger food insecurity and extreme weather that disrupts society.

Chip Roy, the ranking Republican congressma­n on the subcommitt­ee, from Texas, criticized climate advocates for “demonizing companies” that provide jobs and power the country including, as he noted, incubators for babies.

Roy said he was puzzled why the subcommitt­ee on civil rights would discuss the climate crisis.

“Let’s talk about the massive violations of civil liberties that will occur if we do as Elizabeth Warren has said and ban fracking,” Roy said.

Roy’s top campaign supporters are in the oil and gas sector, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Air pollution and the impacts of the climate crisis from fossil fuels disproport­ionately harm people of color, as Democrats noted in stories from their districts.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States