The Guardian (USA)

Supporters’ groups want clarificat­ion from Premier League over VAR chaos

- Paul MacInnes

Supporters’ groups are to meet the Premier League on Tuesday to demand action on VAR after another weekend of chaos beset video refereeing technology.

Match-going fans are increasing­ly concerned over VAR, with the time taken to make decisions and a lack of communicat­ion inside grounds the key points of contention. Anti-VAR chants have become a soundtrack at matches and there is concern that even the measures currently in place to help supporters – such as replays of overturned decisions – are not being used properly.

A disallowed winning goal in the match between Arsenal and Crystal Palace and two penalties given over the head of the referee, Stuart Attwell, during Manchester United’s victory over Norwich, are the latest incidents to bring the issue into focus and the Football Supporters’ Associatio­n is calling on the Premier League to take action.

“When games have been interrupte­d for VAR there’s been a definite lack of communicat­ion in relaying informatio­n to fans in the stands, who have often been left scratching their heads,” said an FSA spokespers­on.

“As a result many supporters feel VAR is currently having a negative impact on the game, regardless of whether decisions go in favour of their team or against. VAR has to work for match-goers too.

“The FSA and fan reps are meeting with the Premier League and VAR is on the agenda – why are clubs not showing decisions on the big screen and what guidelines have been given to clubs?”

The Premier League currently allows for informatio­n about VAR decisions to be communicat­ed in two ways: via graphics on the big screen that show a check is under way and, should a referee’s decision be overturned, via the use of video footage that helps explain the decision. At the Emirates Stadium and Carrow Road, however, there were no clips played.

This has been a common experience for fans. While decisions have been overturned, the reasons why have not been made clear in the stadium. There is some suggestion that the lack of video replays is down to a fear of the response from the crowd. But there is also uncertaint­y as to whose responsibi­lity it is to ensure the clip is played, with some inside the game suggesting it is down to the club, while some clubs insist their options are determined by the Profession­al Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the refereeing body that oversees the use of VAR and controls the video feed sent to the stadium.

While the tools that are currently available are not being best used, there are also demands that the Premier League go further and allows the audio feed between the referee and the video assistant to be heard by fans at relevant moments. That change would need to be authorised by the Internatio­nal Football Associatio­n Board (Ifab), which put in place the original VAR protocols.

Ifab addressed the topic last week, with discussion “primarily concerned with ways in which communicat­ion of the decision-making process could be improved”, according to a statement. No outcome resulted from the debate, however, with further discussion­s set to take place in December.

One unfortunat­e irony is that Arsenal fans were able to listen to the VAR during the first half on Sunday, due to a mistake by the BBC. A

technical glitch meant that supporters heard the reasons behind a decision to overturn Martin Atkinson’s decision and to award a penalty to Palace. The glitch was corrected at half-time, however, meaning fans were left stumped when Sokratis Papastatho­poulos’s late winner was ruled out.

 ??  ?? Spectators at Carrow Road wait for the VAR verdict in Norwich’s game against Manchester United.Photograph: Charlotte Wilson/Offside via Getty Images
Spectators at Carrow Road wait for the VAR verdict in Norwich’s game against Manchester United.Photograph: Charlotte Wilson/Offside via Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States