The Guardian (USA)

White nationalis­ts are openly operating on Facebook. The company won't act

- Julia Carrie Wong in San Francisco

On 7 November, Lana Lokteff, an American white nationalis­t, introduced a “thought criminal and political prisoner and friend” as a featured guest on her internet talk show, Red Ice TV.

For about 90 minutes, Lokteff and her guest – Greg Johnson, a prominent white nationalis­t and editor-inchief of the white nationalis­t publisher Counter-Currents – discussed Johnson’s recent arrest in Norway amid authoritie­s’ concerns about his past expression of “respect” for the far-right mass murderer Anders Breivik. In 2012, Johnson wrote that he was angered by Breivik’s crimes because he feared they would harm the cause of white nationalis­m but had discovered a “strange new respect” for him during his trial; Breivik’s murder of 77 people has been cited as an inspiratio­n by the suspected Christchur­ch killer, the man who murdered the British MP Jo Cox, and a US coast guard officer accused of plotting a white nationalis­t terror attack.

Just a few weeks earlier, Red Ice TV had suffered a serious setback when it was permanentl­y banned from YouTube for repeated violations of its policy against hate speech. But Red Ice TV still had a home on Facebook, allowing the channel’s 90,000 followers to stream the discussion on Facebook Watch – the platform Mark Zuckerberg launched as a place “to share an experience and bring people together who care about the same things”.

The conversati­on wasn’t a unique occurrence. Facebook promised to ban white nationalis­t content from its platform in March 2019, reversing a yearslong policy to tolerate the ideology. But Red Ice TV is just one of several white nationalis­t outlets that remain active on the platform today.

A Guardian analysis found longstandi­ng Facebook pages for VDare, a white nationalis­t website focused on opposition to immigratio­n; the Affirmativ­e Right, a rebranding of Richard Spencer’s blog Alternativ­e Right, which helped launch the “altright” movement; and American Free Press, a newsletter founded by the white supremacis­t Willis Carto, in addition to multiple pages associated with Red Ice TV. Also operating openly on the platform are two Holocaust denial organizati­ons, the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust and the Institute for Historical Review.

“There’s no question that every single one of these groups is a white nationalis­t group,” said Heidi Beirich, the director of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) Intelligen­ce Project, after reviewing the Guardian’s findings. “It’s not even up for debate. There’s really no excuse for not removing this material.”

White nationalis­ts support the establishm­ent of whites-only nation states, both by excluding new nonwhite immigrants and, in some cases, by expelling or killing non-white citizens and residents. Many contempora­ry proponents of white nationalis­m fixate on conspiracy theories about demographi­c change and consider racial or ethnic diversity to be acts of “genocide” against the white race.

Facebook declined to take action against any of the pages identified by the Guardian. A company spokespers­on said: “We are investigat­ing to determine whether any of these groups violate our policies against organized hate. We regularly review organizati­ons against our policy and any that violate will be banned permanentl­y.”

The spokespers­on also said that Facebook does not ban Holocaust denial, but does work to reduce the spread of such content by limiting the distributi­on of posts and preventing Holocaust-denying groups and pages from appearing in algorithmi­c recommenda­tions. Such limitation­s are being applied to the two Holocaust denial groups identified by the Guardian, the spokespers­on said.

The Guardian undertook a review of white nationalis­t outlets on Facebook amid a debate over the company’s decision to include Breitbart News in Facebook News, a new section of its mobile app dedicated to “high quality” journalism. Facebook has faced significan­t pressure to reduce the distributi­on of misinforma­tion on its platform. Critics of Breitbart News object to its inclusion in what Zuckerberg has described as a “trusted source” of informatio­n on two fronts: its repeated publicatio­n of partisan misinforma­tion and conspiracy theories – and its promotion of extreme rightwing views.

A growing body of evidence shows the influence of white nationalis­m on Breitbart’s politics. Breitbart’s former executive chairman Steve Bannon called the site “the platform for the alt-right” in 2016. In 2017, BuzzFeed News reported on emails and documents showing how a former Breitbart editor had worked directly with a white nationalis­t and a neo-Nazi to write and edit an article about the “altright” movement.

This month, the SPLC and numerous news organizati­ons have reported on a cache of emails between the senior Trump adviser Stephen Miller and the former Breitbart writer Katie McHugh showing how Miller pushed for coverage and inclusion of white nationalis­t ideas in the publicatio­n. The emails show Miller directing McHugh to read links from VDare and another white nationalis­t publicatio­n, American Renaissanc­e, among other sources. In one case, reported by NBC News, Breitbart ran an anti-immigratio­n oped submitted by Miller under the byline “Breitbart News”.

A Breitbart spokeswoma­n, Elizabeth Moore, said that the outlet “is not now nor has it ever been a platform for the alt-right”. Moore also said McHugh was “a troubled individual” who had been fired for a number of reasons “including lying”.

“Breitbart is the funnel through which VDare’s ideas get out to the public,” said Beirich. “It’s basically a conduit of conspiracy theory and racism into the conservati­ve movement … We don’t list them as a hate group, but to consider them a trusted news source is pandering at best.”

Drawing the line between politics and news

Facebook executives have responded defensivel­y to criticism of Breitbart News’s inclusion in the Facebook News tab, arguing that the company should not pick ideologica­l sides.

“Part of having this be a trusted source is that it needs to have a diversity of … views in there,” Zuckerberg said at an event in New York in response to a question about Breitbart’s inclusion. Campbell Brown, Facebook’s head of news partnershi­ps, wrote in a lengthy Facebook post that she believed Facebook should “include content from ideologica­l publishers on both the left and the right”. Adam Mosseri, the head of Instagram and a longtime Facebook executive, questioned on Twitter whether the company’s critics “really want a platform of our scale to make decisions to exclude news organizati­ons based on their ideology”. In response to a question from the Guardian, Mosseri acknowledg­ed that Facebook does ban the ideology of white nationalis­m, then added: “The tricky bit is, and this is always the case, where exactly to draw the line.”

One of the challenges for Facebook is that white nationalis­t and white supremacis­t groups adopt the trappings of news outlets or publicatio­ns to disseminat­e their views, said Joan Donovan, the director of the Technology and Social Change Research Project at Harvard and an expert on media manipulati­on.

Red Ice TV is “a group that styles themselves as a news organizati­on when they are primarily a political organizati­on, and the politics are staunchly white supremacis­t”, Donovan said. “We have seen this happen in the past where organizati­ons like the KKK have produced their own newspapers … It doesn’t mean that it qualifies as news.”

Many people argue that Breitbart is more of a “political front” than a news operation, she added. “When Steve Bannon left Breitbart in order to work much more concretely with campaigns, you could see that Breitbart was a political organ before anything else. Really what they were trying to do was give white supremacis­t politics a veneer of objectivit­y.”

Donovan said she expects platform companies will reassess their treatment of Breitbart following the release of the Miller emails. She also called for Facebook to take a more “holistic” approach to combating US domestic terrorism, as it does with foreign terrorist groups.

A Facebook spokespers­on noted that Facebook News is still in a test phase and that Facebook is not paying Breitbart News for its inclusion in the program. The spokespers­on said the company would continue to listen to feedback from news publishers.

A history of tolerance for hate

Facebook has long asserted that “hate speech has no space on Facebook”, whether it comes from a news outlet or not.

But the $566bn company has consistent­ly allowed a variety of hate groups to use its platform to spread their message, even when alerted to their presence by the media or advocacy groups. In July 2017, in response to queries from the Guardian, Facebook said that more than 160 pages and groups identified as hate groups by SPLC did not violate its community standards. Those groups included:

American Renaissanc­e, a white supremacis­t website and magazine;

The Council of Conservati­ve Citizens, a white nationalis­t organizati­on referenced in the manifesto written by Dylann Roof before he murdered nine people in a black church;

The Occidental Observer, an online publicatio­n described by the Anti-Defamation

League as the “primary voice for antisemiti­sm from far-right intellectu­als”;

the Traditiona­list Worker party, a neo-Nazi group that had already been involved in multiplevi­olent incidents; and

Counter-Currents, the white nationalis­t publishing imprint run by the white nationalis­t Greg Johnson, the recent guest on Red Ice TV.

Three weeks later, following the deadly Unite the Right rally in Charlottes­ville, Facebook announced a crackdown on violent threats and removed pages associated with the the Traditiona­list Worker party, Counter-Currents, and the neo-Nazi organizati­on Gallows Tree Wotansvolk. Many of the rest remained.

A year later, a Guardian review found that many of the groups and individual­s involved in the Charlottes­ville event were back on Facebook, including the neo-Confederat­e League of the South, Patriot Front and Jason Kessler, who organized Unite the Right. Facebook took those pages down following inquiries from the Guardian, but declined to take action against the page of David Duke, the notorious white supremacis­t and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.

In May 2018, Vice News’s Motherboar­d reported on internal Facebook training documents that showed the company was distinguis­hing between white supremacy and white nationalis­m – and explicitly allowing white nationalis­m.

In July 2018, Zuckerberg defended the motivation­s of people who engage in Holocaust denial during an interview, saying that he did not “think that they’re intentiona­lly getting it wrong”. Following widespread criticism, he retracted his remarks.

It was not until March 2019 that Facebook acknowledg­ed that white nationalis­m “cannot be meaningful­ly separated from white supremacy and organized hate groups” and banned it.

Beirich expressed deep frustratio­n with Facebook’s track record.

“We have consulted with Facebook many, many times,” Beirich added. “We have sent them our list of hate groups. It’s not like they’re not aware, and I always get the sense that there is good faith desire [to take action], and yet over and over again [hate groups] keep popping up. It’s just not possible for civil rights groups like SPLC to play the role of flagging this stuff for Facebook. It’s a company that makes $42bn a year and I have a staff of 45.”

 ??  ?? Facebook remains a home for a number of white nationalis­t groups despite promising a ban in March. Photograph: Megan Jelinger/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
Facebook remains a home for a number of white nationalis­t groups despite promising a ban in March. Photograph: Megan Jelinger/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Mark Zuckerberg has called for a ‘diversity’ of views. Photograph: Erin Scott/Reu
Mark Zuckerberg has called for a ‘diversity’ of views. Photograph: Erin Scott/Reu

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States