The Guardian (USA)

Mia Wasikowska on Judy & Punch and gendered violence: 'How do you break that cycle?'

- Debbie Zhou

Mia Wasikowska is distracted. Her eyes flicker between me and the doorway at the boutique cinema where we meet in Sydney, as patrons bustle out. She’s hyperaware of the flurrying chaos; it’s clear she feels more comfortabl­e in the quiet.

“I always find it trippy when I do press at home … I feel almost too relaxed and I’m not in the mode of doing this,” the Canberra-born actor says, waving her hand at the general surroundin­gs. “You know,” she pauses. “It’s nice.”

Wasikowska, 30, is dressed in a flowy pink frock for the photoshoot; its dreamy and reminiscen­t of her role in 2010’s Alice in Wonderland. While her depiction as teen gymnast Sophie in HBO’s In Treatment launched her career overseas, it was Tim Burton’s highly elaborate adaptation of Lewis Carroll’s story that catapulted her into mainstream Hollywood at the age of 20. Her portrayal of Alice showcased her chameleon-like quality, with a sometimes subtle, sometimes expressive face that can describe emotional depths louder than words.

Since then she has carved out an unconventi­onal career path, choosing “strange stories and unusual characters” in films including Park Chanwook’s

Stoker and Guillermo del Toro’s Crimson Peak. Wasikowska’s eyes light up talking about those parts: “I feel like you get a chance to play these emotions that are much harder to express in real life. It’s more fun to play [roles that have] their internal mess externalis­ed.”

In line with that ethos comes her latest part: the titular character in Judy & Punch. The writer-director Mirrah Foulkes’s film is a dark, feminist reinterpre­tation of the traditiona­l 17th century British puppet show, and marks Wasikowska’s first Australian film since 2013’s Tracks. While that film’s protagonis­t had a sunburnt toughness, Judy is more quietly fierce.

Set in the mythical town of Seaside, the film is marked by odd tonal shifts, swinging between playful slapstick and more sinister humour, where “stoning days” and witch trials are treated as much for entertainm­ent value as Professor Punch’s (Damon Herriman) increasing­ly “punchy” marionette show. And then a startling moment of unforgivab­le neglect shifts the narrative into a dark revenge tale, as Judy powerfully seizes control of her own fate from her blundering, boozy spouse.

The actor was attracted to the “creative licence” she was given to play with and the fantastica­l elements of the period drama. “I was really blown away by how weird the world Mirrah created was, and the very odd language the characters used. It was really cool how she pulled it together, very authentica­lly and with heaps of her imaginatio­n.”

Judy stays so long in her abusive marriage, Wasikowska says, because she doesn’t want to give up on the fantasy of her life, with her husband and baby at her side. “Judy would be perfectly happy staying where they are, and being around people that she knows and loves,” she explains. “So she continuall­y turns a blind eye and forgives him for his behaviour. And unfortunat­ely it takes a tragedy for her to really find her strength.”

Although the film was conceived before #MeToo, it resonates with the modern politics of the movement. It also speaks to staggering­ly high statistics of domestic violence and violence against women and highlights how brutality in the world around us can infiltrate the home.

“That’s exactly what the Punch and Judy show did in a way – in these crass, violent characters that you’re showing to children,” Wasikowska says. “And how can you expect it not to filter back into the family home? How are you supposed to break that cycle? It becomes a bit like your diet.”

While she was initially sceptical about the #MeToo movement’s potential for a long-term impact, Wasikowska now sees there has been a cultural shift – within and outside Hollywood – that has made it easier for women to speak out. “I think there have been repercussi­ons that will make it hard to be as predatory, but also the stigma has been taken away from just talking about it,” she says.

Having experience­d the ups and downs of the industry for more than a decade, what appeals to Wasikowska now is predictabi­lity – or what she calls “an enjoyable nice life”. That means settling down in Sydney.

“I mean, acting’s been great. But I’m tired of it. I’m a full retiree,” she says, only half-joking; she wants to pursue other interests now too.

“I feel less ambitious about my career,” she admits. “I don’t like a lot of change – I like simple stuff. I like being at home.”

 ?? Photograph: Anna Kucera/The Guardian ?? ‘I feel less ambitious about my career,’ says Mia Wasikowska, who has returned to Australia for a quieter life.
Photograph: Anna Kucera/The Guardian ‘I feel less ambitious about my career,’ says Mia Wasikowska, who has returned to Australia for a quieter life.
 ?? Photograph: Anna Kucera/The Guardian ?? ‘Acting’s been great. But I’m tired of it’: Mia Wasikowska, photograph­ed at Sydney’s Golden Age cinema and bar.
Photograph: Anna Kucera/The Guardian ‘Acting’s been great. But I’m tired of it’: Mia Wasikowska, photograph­ed at Sydney’s Golden Age cinema and bar.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States