The Guardian (USA)

Trump has savaged the environmen­t. The planet cannot afford a second term

- Ross Barkan

What are the consequenc­es of a second term of Donald Trump? To even consider the question sends the left-leaning mind into a paroxysm. Everything from nuclear war to the utter collapse of American democracy looms large in the imaginatio­ns of otherwise soberminde­d people.

In truth, the damage may be less immediatel­y obvious. Life, in many ways, would go on. But the planet we inhabit will continue to heat up, and the most powerful government on Earth would be doing everything it can to further destabiliz­e the environmen­t around us. Just after the new year, the Trump administra­tion announced it planned to radically revise the National Environmen­tal Policy Act, a landmark measure that forced federal infrastruc­ture projects to take into account their impact on the environmen­t. Under the rewritten rules, builders of highways, pipelines, and other major infrastruc­ture projects would no longer have to consider climate change when assessing their impact.

It is, without question, one of the most grievous blows Trump has inflicted since taking office three years ago. It follows more than 100 environmen­tal rollbacks, including relaxing rules limiting emissions from coal plants and weakening protection­s for endangered species.

Fossil fuel projects like the Keystone

XL oil pipeline would have free rein, undaunted by court challenges that ruled the Trump administra­tion didn’t properly consider climate change when analyzing the pipeline’s impact. The new rules would dramatical­ly narrow which projects would require environmen­tal review, with many infrastruc­ture initiative­s sailing through the approval process without having to disclose plans to discharge waste, cut trees or increase air pollution.

The new rule would no longer require agencies to consider the “cumulative”

consequenc­es of new infrastruc­ture, a requiremen­t interprete­d as a mandate to study the effects of ruinous greenhouse gas emission and rising sea levels. The act currently requires the federal government to prepare detailed analyses of projects that could have major environmen­tal effects.

It was a Republican, Richard Nixon, who enacted the law in 1970 after the heavily polluted Cuyahoga River caught fire and a tanker spilled 3m gallons of crude off the coast of California. Though Nixon was a perpetual villain for leftists of the era, he created the Environmen­tal Protection Agency, developing the crucial regulation­s under attack today. Even conservati­ves at the time acknowledg­ed that the government had a role to play in being stewards of the environmen­t we all share.

We are in a new, terrifying age. Trump’s Republican party is far more savagely conservati­ve than any version that came before it. It’s important to understand that the shredding of environmen­tal regulation­s is not something that would have been unique to a Trump presidency, unlike his Twitter inanities or nonstop campaign rallies. The Koch brothers and other billionair­e funders of the Republican party have been dreaming of the day they could again control the executive branch to pursue an agenda of environmen­tal destructio­n. Trump presides over a party that denies the existence of climate change, that rejects science itself. There are few equivalent­s elsewhere. Even Boris Johnson’s Conservati­ves acknowledg­e there is a climate crisis afoot. But had Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio won the presidency in 2016, the assault on the EPA would have commenced as expeditiou­sly as it is now. Perhaps they, like Trump, would have named a coal lobbyist to lead the agency.

Four years of damage can be undone. Eight is far more difficult. The Democrats running for president, and the millions who will go to the polls this fall, must understand the planetary stakes. A functionin­g EPA is essential to reversing the worst effects of climate change, which are very likely to be felt at the cataclysmi­c rate the planet is warming.

If Trump has eight years in power, fossil companies will have carte blanche to profit off environmen­tal destructio­n for a very significan­t amount of time. The next Democratic president will not only have to undo Trump’s damage but rapidly play catch-up as the world races to secure a future for the human race. The doomsday clock is ticking.

 ?? Photograph: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images ?? Demonstrat­ors including Jane Fonda march past the Trump Internatio­nal hotel during a climate rally in Washington.
Photograph: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images Demonstrat­ors including Jane Fonda march past the Trump Internatio­nal hotel during a climate rally in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States