The Guardian (USA)

Harry and Meghan show anger at palace over loss of royal branding

- Jamie Doward

The freeze in relations between the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and Buckingham Palace has become apparent after the couple were forced to drop plans to use the brand “SussexRoya­l”.

Posts on the couple’s official website suggest they are angry at the way the decision was reached and how they have been treated compared with other royals. A statement on Friday night suggested that a blanket ban on the use of the word “royal” was unenforcea­ble abroad. “There is not,” it noted, “any jurisdicti­on by the monarchy or Cabinet Office over the use of the word ‘royal’ overseas.”

The couple’s Instagram account uses the name SussexRoya­l, as does a website they set up following their shock decision to stop carrying out official royal duties in favour of financial freedom. Both will have to be rebranded.

A spokeswoma­n for the Sussexes said: “While the duke and duchess are focused on plans to establish a new non-profit organisati­on, given the specific UK government rules surroundin­g use of the word ‘royal’ it has been therefore agreed that their non-profit organisati­on, when it is announced this spring, will not be named Sussex Royal Foundation.

“The Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to use ‘SussexRoya­l’ in any territory post-spring 2020.”

The spokeswoma­n explained that trademark applicatio­ns, which were filed as protective measures “acting on advice from and following the same model for the Royal Foundation”, had been removed.

The couple’s lives as working royals will end on 31 March when they stop representi­ng the Queen and become financiall­y independen­t.

On Friday night their website was updated to provide further details of the new agreement. “While there is not any jurisdicti­on by the monarchy or cabinet office over the use of the word ‘royal’ overseas, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex do not intend to use ‘Sussex Royal’ or any iteration of the word ‘royal’ in any territory (either within the UK or otherwise) when the transition occurs spring 2020,” said a statement.

Their failure to agree a hybrid role within the royal family – performing some royal duties while also working on outside projects – is also a source of regret.

They wrote: “While there is precedent for other titled members of the royal family to seek employment outside of the institutio­n, for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex a 12-month review period has been put in place.”

 ?? Photograph: Toby Melville/Reuters ?? Harry and Meghan. Posts on couple’s official website suggest they are angry at how they have been treated compared with other royals.
Photograph: Toby Melville/Reuters Harry and Meghan. Posts on couple’s official website suggest they are angry at how they have been treated compared with other royals.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States