The Guardian (USA)

Australia could implement mandatory age verificati­on for pornograph­y websites

- Josh Taylor

Australian­s could be forced in the next year to use a federal government identity verificati­on service in order to view pornograph­y websites under recommenda­tions by a government-led parliament­ary committee.

A House of Representa­tives committee issued a report on Thursday calling for the e-safety commission­er to develop a roadmap for bringing in mandatory age verificati­on for online pornograph­y sites in the next 12 months.

Users in Australia could be forced to verify their age before accessing pornograph­y through what could be an exchange hosted by the government to allow identity verificati­on without any of the sites needing to host that user’s personal informatio­n like credit card details or other identity documents.

The committee has said that there should be minimal retention of personal informatio­n so as to not create a honeypot of sensitive data. If data must be retained, “it must be stored in a secure way”.

The committee did not recommend using the proposed facial verificati­on service being developed by Home Affairs, on account of the legislatio­n backing the service being sent back to the drawing board.

The recommenda­tion comes despite the United Kingdom abandoning a similar proposal last year.

The committee acknowledg­ed that the plethora of pornograph­y available on overseas websites, in Google search results, and on social network sites like Twitter would not be able to be captured, many overseas sites would not comply with age verificati­on requests from Australia, and that young people would likely bypass the verificati­on system, but still said verificati­on was the best way to reduce harm.

“We must not let the perfect be the enemy of the good,” committee chair Andrew Wallace said.

The committee flagged more regulation could be considered to capture social media and others, and did not rule out potentiall­y bringing back mandatory internet filtering, as some people in submission­s to the inquiry had suggested.

“A clear message in evidence to the inquiry is that an effective response to the exposure of children and young people to online pornograph­y will be broader than age verificati­on,” the committee said.

“Other technical solutions, education, and a broader focus on e-safety will all contribute to minimising harms from online pornograph­y and bringing about a safer online environmen­t for our children.”

Under the current system, refused classifica­tion websites hosted in Australia can be ordered to remove the

content, but the e-safety commission­er only passes on a list of overseas hosted sites to internet service providers for opt-in family friendly filters.

Similar recommenda­tions were made for online gambling websites, and for loot boxes sold in video games.

In comments in the report, Labor members of the committee recommende­d further review and stated the public may not trust a system that could potentiall­y increase risks and have unintended consequenc­es around data security and privacy.

Labor’s assistant spokesman on communicat­ions and cybersecur­ity, Tim Watts, pointed to the UK abandoning its version of age verificati­on.

“Labor will look closely at what the e-safety commission­er can come up with to address this difficult but very important issue,” he said.

 ?? Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo ?? The committee says that while many overseas pornograph­y sites won’t comply with Australian age verificati­on requests, verificati­on would still reduce harm.
Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo The committee says that while many overseas pornograph­y sites won’t comply with Australian age verificati­on requests, verificati­on would still reduce harm.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States