The Guardian (USA)

CEOs, not the unemployed, are America's real 'moral hazard'

- Robert Reich

The coronaviru­s relief enacted by Congress is barely reaching Americans in need. This week, checks of up to $1,200 are being delivered through direct-deposit filings with the Internal Revenue Service. But lowincome people who have not directly deposited their taxes won’t get them for weeks or months. Worse yet, the US treasury is allowing banks to seize payments to satisfy outstandin­g debts.

Meanwhile, most of the promised $600 weekly extra unemployme­nt benefits remain stuck in offices now overwhelme­d with claims.

None of this seems to bother conservati­ve Republican­s, who believe all such relief creates what’s called “moral hazard” – the risk that government benefits will allow people to slack off.

The Republican senator Lindsey Graham, for example, says state unemployme­nt offices are overwhelme­d because the extra $600 is “incentiviz­ing people to leave the workforce”. Hello?

When it comes to big corporatio­ns and their CEOs, however, conservati­ves don’t worry about moral hazard. They should.

Before the coronaviru­s outbreak, corporatio­ns were borrowing money like mad, capitalizi­ng on the Fed’s bargain-basement interest rates. Total business debt topped $16tn last year.

Corporatio­ns used much of this debt to buy back their own shares of stock. This raised the earnings of each remaining share, creating a bonanza for big investors and top executives.

Trump never tired of pointing out how spectacula­rly stocks had risen on his watch. But he neglected to men

tion those stocks were floating on a rising sea of corporate debt – which left corporate America dangerousl­y unprepared for any sharp downturn.

Then came Covid-19 and the sharpest downturn on record.

American corporatio­ns spent $730bn on buybacks last year and more than $370bn this year before the virus, much of it financed by debt. If they hadn’t frittered away that trillion or so dollars, they’d be better able to cope with this emergency.

Over the past five years, four big airlines and the aerospace giant Boeing spent more than $70bn buying back their own stock, putting them deep in debt. If they hadn’t binged on buybacks, they’d be better equipped to weather this storm.

No worries. Government is bailing them out, just as it did the Wall Street banks that exploded in 2008.

On 9 April the Fed announced it will buy up corporate debt, even backstoppi­ng private-equity firms that also borrowed to the hilt. The treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, announced on Tuesday an agreement with the airlines under which they will receive billions of taxpayer dollars.

Forget moral hazard. They’re all too big to fail.

The Fed and the treasury had little choice. Massive defaults and bankruptci­es would wreak even more havoc on the economy. Better to maintain some payrolls than add to the unemployme­nt rolls.

But by saving the backsides of big corporatio­ns and their CEOs, the bailouts have rewarded corporate America’s obsession with short-term profits regardless of longer-term risks to the corporatio­n, its employees, and the overall economy.

Why is moral hazard a problem when it comes to millions of jobless Americans who can’t even collect $600 in unemployme­nt benefits, but not a problem when it comes to CEOs who have borrowed to the hilt, used the money to artificial­ly boost share prices, and pocketed $20m a year?

Giving the vast majority of Americans a bit more cushion against the downside risks they face surely poses less harm than giving CEOs a cushion against the risks they take with the entire economy.

It’s not too late for the Fed and the treasury to take shares of stock in every corporatio­n that gets bailed out.

This way, CEOs and big investors aren’t rewarded for binging on debt to finance stock buybacks. The public gets in on the upside of any eventual recovery. And there will be more money to finance stronger safety nets for Americans who actually need them.

Another necessary step is to ban stock buybacks – as was the case before 1982, when the Securities and Exchange Commission viewed them as potential vehicles for stock manipulati­on and fraud.

They still are. Shareholde­rs who unwittingl­y sell their stocks back to corporatio­ns that are artificial­ly pumping up share prices lose out on the gains. Why isn’t this fraud?

A final step must be to regulate credit-rating agencies charged with informing investors about the true riskiness of corporate debt. Why were they still giving high ratings to the bonds of corporatio­ns so laden with debt they couldn’t survive a downturn?

The real moral hazard has been in C-Suites, not in homes. It’s time to stop bailing out corporatio­ns and start bailing out people.

Robert Reich, a former US secretary of labor, is professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few and The Common Good. His new book, The System: Who Rigged It, How We Fix It, is out now. He is a columnist for Guardian US

 ??  ?? Lindsey Graham is among the Republican­s who have attacked extra unemployme­nt benefits. Photograph: Andrew Harnik/AP
Lindsey Graham is among the Republican­s who have attacked extra unemployme­nt benefits. Photograph: Andrew Harnik/AP

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States