The Guardian (USA)

Climate crisis will deepen the pandemic. A green stimulus plan can tackle both

- Daniel Aldana Cohen and Daniel Kammen

The Covid-19 epidemic is ravaging our tattered healthcare system and shredding our economy. In the past month, over 22 million Americans filed for unemployme­nt benefits, compoundin­g the fear that unemployme­nt could breach 32% absent massive public action. This is an unmitigate­d human disaster, recalling the horrors of the Great Depression. And it gets worse. We’re also facing the climate emergency. Immediater­elief is necessary – but not sufficient. To tackle all these crises at once, we need a Green Stimulus that creates jobs and lifts up communitie­s in ways that also slash carbon pollution, increase resiliency, and develop a just, modern economy.

No one can predict when Speaker Nancy Pelosi and President Donald Trump will turn their full attention to economic recovery. But behind the scenes, the planning has already begun. It’s not a question of whether we spend big on stimulus, but what kind of stimulus.

And while Republican­s will decry anything “green”, we can win the argument. But much of what we propose already has bipartisan support, from polling to pending legislatio­n.

Climate change is about to supercharg­e the coronaviru­s emergency. In April, California’s wildfire season will start. Restrictio­ns on work caused by the pandemic will make it harder for firefighte­rs to conduct controlled burns that steer fires – and smoke – from homes. California­ns’ lungs could face Covid-19 and unusually intense smoke at the same time. A third of the country also faces serious flood risk through the spring. And in summer and fall, forecaster­s predict “above average probabilit­y for major hurricanes making landfall along the continenta­l United States”. We’re already seeing this catastroph­ic convergenc­e elsewhere: In Ecuador, a muted government response to flooding in indigenous communitie­s, for fear of spreading the virus; in

Fiji, devastated by Cyclone Harold this week, 19 confirmed coronaviru­s cases are casting doubt on how to rebuild.

Here too, we will need to find ways to do the needed relief work without deepening the pandemic. Amid all this suffering, the case for bold moves to tackle the miseries of inequality, Covid, and climate at once will get clearer.

Moreover, green stimulus is the only option for a smooth transition to the 21st century green economy. The era of dirty energy is ending. Even the conservati­ve CBNC analyst Jim Cramer has warned investors that oil stocks are no longer safe investment­s, as society is increasing­ly repudiatin­g fossil fuels. Giant investors like Blackrock are gradually winding down their investment­s in carbon. And at the European level, and in countries like Germany and South Korea, a green stimulus-based recovery is becoming the consensus choice, with investment­s in efficiency and clean energy seen as obvious drivers of economic reconstruc­tion.

Here in the US, green stimulus is easily the best way to create good jobs through public investment. According to a 2011 World Bank study, $1m invested in the oil and gas in the United States creates just five jobs, compared to 17 jobs per million dollars invested in energy-saving building retrofits, 22 jobs for mass transit, 13 for wind, and 14 for solar. Kammen’s research and that of

other institutes all concur that investment in a modern green economy is a more efficient job creator than the fossil sector.

The longer-term vision of the green stimulus is a more rewarding, lifelong career of dignified green work. We should also invest in Stem education for allchildre­n and create apprentice­ship programs in vulnerable communitie­s, matched with new careers for workers to enter. And by directly investing in frontline communitie­s, following best practices in California, we can bring technologi­es like solar and battery storage to neighborho­ods that have been scandalous­ly left out of the clean energy boom so far. Plus, these same nimble, local solutions make neighborho­ods more resilient to extreme weather. Local storage and nested microgrids make the power system, including healthcare facilities, more reliable during disasters. We’d be making environmen­tal, economic, and social improvemen­ts in the same places, at the same time.

And we should speak of green investment­s in concrete terms. Polling conducted by Data for Progress in March finds majority support for massive green spending overall. More interestin­g is the finding of even greater support – including majority Republican approval – for specific public green investment­s, like electric buses, retrofits to low-income housing, and renewable energy. Strip away abstract rhetoric, and the substance that we’re advocating is incredibly popular.

For these reasons, we recently joined nine other experts in social and climate policy to write a letter to Congress outlining a menu of policy options for a Green Stimulus. Our proposals span eight sectors of the economy. But fundamenta­lly, a Green Stimulus is about mobilizing massive public funds – say, $2tn to start – in specific green investment­s to create highqualit­y jobs and improve the quality of life, especially in low-income communitie­s, communitie­s of color, and indigenous communitie­s, which have suffered the most disinvestm­ent and pollution in recent decades.

It seems counterint­uitive, but the timing for such a Green Stimulus is perfect. Bridge-loans and advance payments on public green purchases of goods like solar panels and electric vehicles for public use would stabilize firms’ and workers’ finances. Announcing

initiative­s like a Climate Conservati­on Corps would give young people eager to work jobs to apply for, and plan to start. And desk workers across the economy could get on Zoom and do paperwork to make green projects shovel-ready the minute it’s safe to break ground. (Indeed, a major reason the 2009 Obama stimulus faltered was months wasted on paperwork.)

Each of us has lived through climate-fueled disasters – in Cohen’s case, Hurricane Sandy, and in Kammen’s,

Daniel Aldana Cohen is assistant professor of sociology at the University of Pennsylvan­ia, where he directs the Socio-Spatial Climate Collaborat­ive, or (SC)2, and is a co-author of A Planet to Win: Why We Need a Green New Deal

Daniel Kammen is professor at the University of California, Berkeley, coordinati­ng lead author for the Intergover­nmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and former Science Envoy for the United States Department of State

This story is a part of Covering Climate Now’s week of coverage focused on climate solutions, to mark the 50th anniversar­y of Earth Day. Covering Climate Now is a global journalism collaborat­ion committed to strengthen­ing coverage of the climate story

has been evident in the arts establishm­ent over the past few years, during which the only thing they had to tell us was that Brexit was bad. Innovative

had the chance to change our minds, but we never did. Mark collected all the emails when I got home and put them in a book.”

They married in London when she returned in 2016 and Kärri got pregnant nine months later. “I was doing a job I loved, but we had to rethink our plans,” she says. After a visit to Estonia, they decided it would be the best place to raise their child.

In January 2018, they welcomed their little girl into the family. Now firmly establishe­d in Estonia, Mark works as a product manager for a media company, while Kärri works in marketing for a bank. At the moment, the country is in lockdown and the pair are juggling work with childcare. “I think at the start we thought we’d have to drink every day,” laughs Kärri. “Now we’re wondering when it will end.”

Despite the challenges, Mark says they are incredibly lucky. “I love that she always makes me think about what

I am doing and why. I usually end up realising she’s right, too. She helps me to relax and encourages me to do the things I love.”

For Kärri, it is Mark’s accepting nature that makes the relationsh­ip work so well. “I never have to apologise for being myself, which makes me feel so safe,” she explains. “I’m able to give more back to the people I love as a result. He makes me the best person I can be.”

Want to share your story? Tell us a little about you, your partner and how you got together by filling in the form here.

 ??  ?? ‘We don’t want to bounce back to a January 2020 economy when half the country lived paycheck to paycheck; unchecked carbon pollution endangered our future; and racial inequaliti­es made people of color so vulnerable to disease.’ Photograph: Michael Reynolds/EPA
‘We don’t want to bounce back to a January 2020 economy when half the country lived paycheck to paycheck; unchecked carbon pollution endangered our future; and racial inequaliti­es made people of color so vulnerable to disease.’ Photograph: Michael Reynolds/EPA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States