The Guardian (USA)

Rangers claim SPFL tried to 'influence' Uefa into allowing early end to season

- Ewan Murray

A letter from the chief executives of the Scottish Profession­al Football League and Scottish Football Associatio­n to Uefa, claiming majority club support to end this season before a vote had been taken, forms a key part of a much-anticipate­d dossier distribute­d by Rangers to fellow clubs.

Rangers are also adamant SPFL members were not informed of a potential £10m liability to broadcaste­rs and sponsors if they voted to curtail the campaign.

Rangers want an independen­t investigat­ion into circumstan­ces surroundin­g a controvers­ial resolution, passed last month, which ended the season in Scotland’s bottom three tiers and gave the SPFL’s board a mandate to do likewise in the Premiershi­p.

“We have lost confidence in the way they are running the organisati­on, quite frankly,” said Stewart Robertson, Rangers’ managing director, of the SPFL executive. Robertson denied the end game related to Celtic taking delivery of a ninth title in succession. “To be absolutely clear this has never been a Rangers-Celtic thing. It’s about looking at the governance of the game. I’ve now had five stints on the SPL or SPFL board between 2003 and now.”

The club has distribute­d paperwork to the other 41 members of the SPFL before an extraordin­ary general meeting scheduled for Tuesday at which the call for an inquiry will be voted on.

In a cover letter Robertson writes: “Our legal counsel advised that a strong case can be made in the court of session for a breach of directors duties. However, it is our clear preference that this matter be resolved by members through an independen­t investigat­ion to protect clubs from the higher cost of such a route.”

Included in Rangers’ documentat­ion is reference to a letter dated 4 April and signed by Neil Doncaster and Ian Maxwell, the chief executives of the SPFL and SFA respective­ly. Rangers insist “the letter was clearly intended to influence the Uefa executive committee that a dispensati­on should be provided to permit the SPFL to end the 2019-20 season prematurel­y”.

A quote from the letter in Rangers’ report reads: “We are writing as discussed to explain why the vast majority of SPFL clubs are calling for curtailmen­t of the 2019-20 season in Scotland.”

The SPFL, although confident it could return a successful vote after canvassing clubs, did not issue ballot papers until 8 April. The SFA’s 2019-20 competitio­n, the Scottish Cup, has been postponed indefinite­ly at the semifinal stage. The governing body has explained that Maxwell signed the letter because the SFA is Scotland’s natural communicat­ions route to Uefa.

Rangers also point towards legal advice they claim was delivered to the SPFL regarding penalties, primarily from Sky and BT Sport, associated with ending the season before standard commitment­s had been met. The value quoted is “around £10m” with Rangers insisting this informatio­n was not given to clubs before the vote.

“The 42 clubs are the 42 shareholde­rs of the company,” Robertson added. “If you are asking the members to make that decision then you have to provide them with all the informatio­n that is available. Only then can they make a fully informed decision.

“When you are only distributi­ng £25m worth of prize money this year and there’s the potential of a £10m refund to broadcaste­rs and sponsors, that’s a material number.”

Rangers’ grievances relate mainly to corporate governance and include allegation­s of threats made by club chairmen who favoured ending the season to some of their counterpar­ts. Circumstan­ces attached to Dundee’s resolution vote, which landed in a quarantine folder and was subsequent­ly reversed, are raised.

The SPFL has been asked for comment regarding the Uefa letter, whether it informed clubs about the potential for a £10m liability and allegation­s of threatenin­g behaviour. It said a full response would follow.

Little over an hour after Rangers’ dossier was released to clubs, the SPFL issued a forceful statement focused on an earlier call from Ibrox for the SPFL to suspend Doncaster and Rod McKenzie, the league’s legal adviser.

“It is now a month since Rangers accused the SPFL of bullying and corruption relating to the Dundee FC return,” said a spokesman. “At last, Rangers have issued their ‘dossier’ and we will now take time to review it before responding to all 42 clubs.

“Since Rangers publicly demanded the suspension of the SPFL’s chief executive and legal counsel, everyone in Scottish football has waited patiently for them to present their case.

“However, an initial examinatio­n of their ‘dossier’ has failed to identify a single shred of evidence to support Rangers’ vociferous claims of corruption, bullying and coercion by SPFL staff. If Rangers have any good reason for Neil Doncaster and Rod McKenzie to be suspended, we have yet to see it.”

 ??  ?? Rangers want an independen­t investigat­ion into the resolution to end the season in Scotland. Photograph: Ian Rutherford/PA
Rangers want an independen­t investigat­ion into the resolution to end the season in Scotland. Photograph: Ian Rutherford/PA

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States