The Guardian (USA)

Smart appliances may not be worth money in long run, warns Which?

- Hilary Osborne

Smart appliances that can be controlled remotely and will let you know if there is a fault or other problem may not be worth paying extra for unless manufactur­ers commit to keeping software updated, Which? has warned.

The consumer group said that smart fridges, dishwasher­s and tumble dryers cost hundreds of pounds more than their convention­al counterpar­ts, but in some cases could be rendered obsolete after as little as two years.

It surveyed major manufactur­ers about their plans to issue the software updates needed to keep the products working. It found the majority of manufactur­ers said they would offer updates for “the life of the product”, but did not specify how long that was.

Samsung told the organisati­on this was “a minimum of two years”, while Beko said a maximum of 10 years.

Other major firms did not give a specific time period when asked. BSH (which makes Bosch, Neff and Siemens appliances) said it would provide updates for the lifetime of the product.

Only Miele was definitive, Which? said, stating it would provide 10 years of updates.

Which? said the cost of smart items was much higher than standard products, with consumers paying an average of £855 more for a smart fridge-freezer, £259 more for a smart dishwasher and £190 more for a smart tumble dryer.

Typically dishwasher­s and washing machines last for 10 years before they are replaced due to faults or poor performanc­e, while fridge-freezers and tumble dryers last for 11 years, it said.

Without regular updates, smart items could lose functional­ity and security could be compromise­d, leaving the owner’s network open to hackers. Many of the products will still work without their smart features, but not all.

Which? said a new sales of goods directive from the EU would force manufactur­ers to state upfront how long products would be updated for, but it was not clear when this would be introduced in the UK, and it did not specify how long the period should be.

Natalie Hitchins, the head of home products and services at Which?, said: “Until manufactur­ers are clear and upfront about how long they will support these products for, consumers could be better off avoiding smart appliances that might turn ‘dumb’ after only a few years and stick to more reliable and significan­tly cheaper non-smart alternativ­es.”

 ??  ?? Which? surveyed major manufactur­ers about their plans to issue the software updates needed to keep smart products working. Photograph: Justin Minns/Alamy
Which? surveyed major manufactur­ers about their plans to issue the software updates needed to keep smart products working. Photograph: Justin Minns/Alamy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States