The Guardian (USA)

Joe Biden says his hands are tied on a $15 minimum wage. That's not true

- David Sirota

When a Republican is president, Democratic politician­s, pundits and activists will tell you that the presidency is an allpowerfu­l office that can do anything it wants. When a Democrat is president, these same politician­s, pundits and activists will tell you that the presidency has no power to do anything. In fact, they will tell you a Democratic president cannot even use the bully pulpit and other forms of pressure to try to shift the votes of senators in his own party.

A tale from history proves this latter myth is complete garbage – and that tale is newly relevant in today’s supercharg­ed debate over a $15 minimum wage.

In that debate so far, we have seen Democratic senators prepare to surrender the $15 minimum wage their party promised by insisting they are powerless in the face of a non-binding advisory opinion of a parliament­arian they can ignore or fire.

That explanatio­n is patently ridiculous and factually false, so Democratic apologists are starting to further justify the surrender by suggesting that even if the party kept a $15 minimum wage in the Covid relief bill, conservati­ve Democrats such as Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema would block it anyway.

The White House itself is now falling back on the idea that it doesn’t have the votes to do much of anything, insinuatin­g that Joe Biden – who occupies the world’s most powerful office – somehow has no power to try to change the legislativ­e dynamic. And this spin is being predictabl­y amplified across-social media.

To be sure, there is no guarantee that Manchin or Sinema could be moved. Maybe they couldn’t, but maybe they could, considerin­g they have both previously-supported bills to increase the minimum wage. And we know they may be sensitive to pressure. After all, Manchin recently freaked out and whined that “no one called me” when Vice-President Kamala Harris dared to do one straightfo­rward interview with a West Virginia television station.

Whether such pressure ultimately works, the point is indisputab­le: it is laughable and prepostero­us to argue that a newly elected president has zero power to even try to shift the dynamic.

And yet, whether you call this all deliberate deception or learned helplessne­ss, this fantastica­l myth of the Powerless President will inevitably be used to shield Biden from criticism for abandoning his pledge to fight for a $15 minimum wage.

The apologism is particular­ly absurd because unlike his predecesso­r Barack Obama, who was a relative newcomer to politics, Biden’s major selling point was that he knows “how to make government work”. The guy explicitly pitchedhim­self as the best Democratic presidenti­al candidate by suggesting that in an era of gridlock, he knows how to make the Democratic agenda a reality and Get Things Done™, like master of the Senate Lyndon Baines Johnson.

That’s where LBJ himself comes in to destroy the narrative that Democratic presidents in general – and Biden specifical­ly – are inherently helpless.

‘Lyndon told me to’

In 1964, Johnson was trying to pass Medicare, but two conservati­ve Democratic senators threatened to take down the entire legislatio­n over a tax issue. In

a story flagged by economist Stephanie Kelton, the New York Timesnoted that months before that legislatio­n passed: “Opponents proposed a large and popular increase in Social Security benefits (and taxes) which would have made passage of new Medicare taxes almost impossible. At the last minute, Senators George Smathers of Florida and Russell Long of Louisiana, both Democrats but Medicare opponents, switched and voted to save Medicare. ‘Lyndon told me to,’ Senator Smathers explained.”

The pivotal story was recounted in more detail in The Heart Of Power by Harvard University’s David Blumenthal (a former Obama administra­tion official) and Brown University’s James Morone. They noted that presidents can play a particular­ly unique role in these situations, and they warn against presidents who refuse to leverage their offices to push their agendas:

There has been a lot of dishonesty and deception floating around Democratic Washington these days. There was the lie two months ago that $2,000 checks would be coming “immediatel­y” to a desperate nation struggling through a pandemic. There is the lie about the parliament­arian supposedly being the reason the $15 minimum wage is stalled. There is once again the lie of a forthcomin­g “public option”, which Democrats promised but which is barely being discussed at all, and is not part of the Covid relief legislatio­n.

But the LBJ story shows that the mendacious narrative of a helpless Democratic president is the most pernicious lie of all.

‘Fighting our guts out’ v pre-emptive surrender

If this lie about a Powerless President seems familiar, that’s because it was trotted out during the last Democratic presidency, when Barack Obama refused to lift a finger to pressure similarly conservati­ve Democratic senators to support a wildly popular public insurance option or a union card check initiative that he explicitly-promised. He had enormous congressio­nal majorities and a huge election mandate, but didn’t bother to go to Democratic states to build Democratic voter pressure against recalcitra­nt Democratic senators.

On the contrary, Obama’s chief of staff berated progressiv­es trying to pressure conservati­ve Democrats over health care reform and Obama simply surrendere­d. Meanwhile, obsequious liberal pundits scoffed at a so-called “Green Lantern Theory”, mocking those who suggested that the most powerful man on Earth has any power to influence elected officials in his own party. Obama is still pretending he couldn’t do anything.

Now we see this same Powerless President narrative in the minimum wage fight – and if you look closely, the Biden administra­tion is all but admitting it’s a lie.

After all, the White House continues to say it is “fighting our guts out” for Neera Tanden’s nomination, even though it might not have enough Senate votes for her confirmati­on. And yet, the same White House is simultaneo­usly retreating on the minimum wage, seemingly unwilling to force a floor vote on the issue, even though presidenti­al pressure, legislativ­e brinkmansh­ip, and negotiatio­n could change the outcome.

In the Tanden situation, in fact, the Biden team is acting like a White House’s power of persuasion and legislativ­e arm twisting can potentiall­y move votes for something a president cares about – in this case, the nomination of a Washington insider to a fancy White House job.

The real story, then, is that Biden seems unwilling to use the same influence to push as hard as possible for a minimum wage increase that would boost the pay of millions of Americans during an economic emergency.

He has the power to at least try – he just seems unwilling to.

 ?? Photograph: Joshua Roberts/Reuters ?? ‘Democratic senators are prepared to surrender the $15 minimum wage their party promised by insisting they are powerless in the face of a non-binding advisory opinion of a parliament­arian they can ignore or fire.’
Photograph: Joshua Roberts/Reuters ‘Democratic senators are prepared to surrender the $15 minimum wage their party promised by insisting they are powerless in the face of a non-binding advisory opinion of a parliament­arian they can ignore or fire.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States