The Guardian (USA)

Why Scotland’s election result is unlikely to hasten a referendum

- Michael Keating

Opinion polls for most of the past three years have shown Scotland to be evenly divided between supporters of union and independen­ce. The Scottish parliament election result confirms this again. While the Scottish National party narrowly failed to gain an overall majority, independen­ce supporters (the SNP and the Greens) have 72 of the 129 seats. Scottish electors cast two votes. The first is for a constituen­cy MSP, elected by first-past-the-post as in Westminste­r elections. The second is for a regional party list, with seats distribute­d proportion­ally to ensure that the overall balance in the parliament is close to the regional list vote. Pro-independen­ce parties won 49% of the constituen­cy vote and 50.1% of the vote in the regional lists.

The polarisati­on of Scottish politics around the constituti­onal issue is exacerbate­d by Brexit. While unionists and nationalis­ts backed remain by substantia­l majorities in 2016, since then there has been a move of remainers towards independen­ce, while a smaller number of leavers have moved in the opposite direction. This polarisati­on has benefited the SNP and the Conservati­ves, while Labour has been squeezed.

The middle ground, on which the largest section of Scottish opinion was previously camped – more devolution but short of independen­ce – has shrunk.

There is strong evidence of tactical voting in the constituen­cies, as unionists plump for whichever candidate appears more likely to the beat the nationalis­ts. So many unionists in Edinburgh Southern and Dumbarton go for Labour. In Edinburgh Western and North East Fife they go for the Liberal Democrats. In southern Scotland and Aberdeensh­ire they are attracted to the Conservati­ves. Scots have a long history of tactical voting, which from the 1970s to the 1990s was used mainly against the Conservati­ves. This time it is another indication of the polarisati­on of Scottish politics around the constituti­onal question.

The SNP and Greens take the result as a clear mandate for a second independen­ce referendum. Unionists cannot, as in other countries, claim that this is impossible because the state is indivisibl­e. Successive prime ministers have conceded that Scotland does have the right to self-determinat­ion and there was an independen­ce referendum in 2014. Some have suggested that only an SNP majority should count or that the constituen­cy popular vote is what matters but that risks conceding the principle that a Scottish election can provide such a mandate. Some unionists have argued that the election was not about independen­ce but it was the Scottish Conservati­ves who

 ??  ?? ‘For the nationalis­ts, the difficulty is that there is no clear majority for independen­ce and no guarantee that they would win a referendum.’ Unionists and pro-independen­ce protesters, Glasgow, 1 May 2021. Photograph: Andy Buchanan/AFP/Getty Images
‘For the nationalis­ts, the difficulty is that there is no clear majority for independen­ce and no guarantee that they would win a referendum.’ Unionists and pro-independen­ce protesters, Glasgow, 1 May 2021. Photograph: Andy Buchanan/AFP/Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States