The Guardian view on declining birthrates: there may be trouble ahead
Europe’s baby deficit is becoming impossible to ignore. In Rome on Friday, Italy’s prime minister, Mario Draghi, and Pope Francis were the star attendees at a special conference to discuss the country’s declining birthrate. According to latest figures, 2020 saw the lowest number of births recorded since Italian unification in 1861. Spain is ageing at a similar pace, as is much of eastern Europe. In Britain, it is the same story. The Centre for Population Change recently predicted a postpandemic decline in annual births, deepening a secular trend that has already taken the birthrate to “historically low levels”.
The social implications of these downward trajectories, exacerbated by Covid, are many and various. Assuming current demographic trends continue, Eurostat has calculated that the number of European over-65s will have grown by over 40% by 2050. Fewer people will be in work paying taxes when their pension and care bills arrive. Against that backdrop, rightwing nationalist parties fantasising about a future without migrant labour may as well howl at the moon. Immigration seems likely to continue to be a structural necessity in western democracies, as well as a source of innovation and renewal. But this is about more than the big picture. For many young people, one of the most fundamental sources of human fulfilment – parenthood – is being delayed or forgone out of economic necessity. Procreation should not be seen as a moral obligation, let alone as a patriotic duty. Since the 1960s, with the rise of contraception, declining western birthrates have been partly a result of greater freedom for women to shape and control their own lives. But starting a family should be a far easier option than it has become. Even in Scandinavia, rightly held up as a model when it comes to parental leave and accessible childcare, alarm bells are ringing. The Norwegian prime minister, Erna Solberg, has warned that one of Europe’s best-funded welfare states could only be socially and economically sustainable if people had more children. In Sweden, the annual number of births has consistently fallen for over a decade, constituting a new and worrying trend according to the country’s leading demographers.
In Britain, family-friendly policies such as Sure Start were swept away by austerity. Simply catching up with Scandinavian norms would represent progress for women struggling to combine work and motherhood. But an age of endemic economic insecurity among the young – above all in relation to housing and jobs – also requires a broader response. Across western liberal democracies, the labour market of the early 21st century is unrecognisable compared to even 30 years ago. For many under-35s, a combination of debt, stagnant wages and insecure work make starting a family seem like a risk, rather than a natural step. In Britain especially, for the millions of private renters unable to get on the housing ladder, a lack of assets compounds the problem.
At the beginning of the pandemic, it was speculated, somewhat crassly, that the confinement of lockdown would lead to a Covid baby boom. Amid acute anxiety about the future, the opposite occurred. Birthrates tend to tick upwards during good times, not bad ones. A vaccine bounce in reopening economies may confirm that rule of thumb in the short term. But there is no escaping the underlying pre-Covid reality that too few babies are being born. Without a new deal for young would-be parents, a demographic crisis looms.