The Guardian (USA)

‘Catastroph­ic’: Sierra Leone sells rainforest for Chinese harbour

- Karen McVeigh and Kabba Kargbo in Freetown

A $55m (£39m) deal struck by the government of Sierra Leone with China to build an industrial fishing harbour on 100 hectares (250 acres) of beach and protected rainforest has been criticised as “a catastroph­ic human and ecological disaster” by conservati­onists, landowners and rights groups.

The gold and black sands of Black Johnson beach fringe the African nation’s Western Area Peninsula national park, home to endangered species including the duiker antelope and pangolins. The waters are rich in sar

dines, barracuda and grouper, caught by local fishermen who produce 70% of the fish for the domestic market.

After reports of a Chinese-backed fishmeal plant began circulatin­g on social media, A statement that appeared to be from the Sierra Leonean fisheries ministry confirmed the deal, but denied the planned constructi­on was a “fish mill”. The facility would be a harbour for tuna and “other bigger fishing” vessels exporting to internatio­nal markets, it said. It would include a “waste-management component” to “recycle marine and other wastes into useful products”.

The government said the beach, one of many along the nation’s 250mile (400km) coastline, was the “most suitable place” for constructi­on, and revealed the finance ministry had set aside a compensati­on package of 13.76bn leone (£950,000) for affected landowners. But the statement leaves more questions than answers, say those objecting to the plan.

Two legal campaign groups, the Institute for Legal Research and Advocacy for Justice (ILRAJ) and Namati Sierra Leone, have written to the government, under the 2013 Right to Access Informatio­n Act, demanding to see the environmen­tal and socialimpa­ct assessment studies, and the report showing that the beach was, as claimed, the most suitable place for constructi­on “in terms of bathymetry, social safeguards (minimum resettleme­nt costs) and environmen­tal issues”. They are also seeking a copy of the grant agreement between China and Sierra Leone.

Basita Michael, a lawyer for the ILRAJ, said: “The press release was very vague. It left us wondering how did we arrive here and how come we are only hearing about this now. We have a right to know more.”

James Tonner, who owns land at Black Johnson with his mother, Jane Aspden Gbandewa, has written an open letter to the president, Julius Maada

Bio, calling for him to intervene and stop the constructi­on, which Tonner said would be “disastrous for the country and the planet”.

It would destroy pristine rainforest, plunder fish stocks and pollute fish breeding grounds and several ecosystems, Tonner said. The beach is on Whale Bay, so-named because whales and dolphins are seen there.

Tonner, who lives in London, has set up a crowdfundi­ng page to fund a judicial review into the deal. The government could be acting unconstitu­tionally if it acquired the land compulsori­ly, he said, because the constituti­on requires any such move to be in the public interest. The compensati­on stated by the government was also unfair, he argued, claiming that the rate was about 30 times lower than the market value of the land.

“Under the constituti­on, the government can sequester land if it is in the public interest,” Tonner said. “Even if this just a deep-water harbour, it is not in the public interest because it’s not a suitable site. There are fish breeding sites in the lagoon. It will wipe out the local fish people live on.”

Tito Gbandewa, Tonner’s stepfather, is a former fisherman who runs an ecotourism business on the beach and owns about 1.2 hectares. He said: “If they do this here, the water will be dirty, there will be a lot of oil and noise, the trawlers will be all around.

“Our own fishermen won’t have a place to fish. Everything will be spoiled. Tourism will be finished.”

Dr Sama Banya, president emeritus of the Conservati­on Society of Sierra Leone, echoed Gbandewa’s comments, saying the proposed developmen­t would have a “disastrous” impact on tourism and “the very fish industry that it’s supposed to support”.

Emma Kowa Jalloh, Sierra Leone’s fisheries minister, insisted that the plan was for a harbour and not a fishmeal factory. She said: “I can categorica­lly tell you there is no fish mill [sic] going in at Black Johnson. What we are doing is a fish harbour that will be built by the Chinese government. A fish mill is something where you go and catch all the baby fish and grind it into food to give to piggeries, and fish in aquacultur­e – and that is so not true.”

It would be built with a Chinese government “grant” and equity from Sierra Leone in the form of land, she said. Half of the land needed was government-owned, she said, including the seafront, up to 200 metres from the sea. The rest has been acquired through compulsory acquisitio­n, she said.

“People are making this fuss about it,” the minister added. “I would just appeal to people: ‘be patient, we want to be developed, we want to grow, we want to be classified as an upcoming country. There must be developmen­t and somebody has to sacrifice.’

“I’m not saying everything is going to be 100% perfect but we will make sure that it is near-perfect.”

 ??  ?? The planned developmen­t is on Whale Bay, known for its cetaceans and also a key fish-breeding area, say opponents of the scheme. Photograph: Issouf Sanogo/AFP/ Getty
The planned developmen­t is on Whale Bay, known for its cetaceans and also a key fish-breeding area, say opponents of the scheme. Photograph: Issouf Sanogo/AFP/ Getty
 ??  ?? The beach earmarked for developmen­t fringes the Western Area Peninsula national park, home to endangered species including pangolins. Photograph: Issouf Sanogo/AFP/Getty
The beach earmarked for developmen­t fringes the Western Area Peninsula national park, home to endangered species including pangolins. Photograph: Issouf Sanogo/AFP/Getty

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States