The Guardian (USA)

Governor vows to make California a ‘reproducti­ve freedom state’

-

The California governor signed two laws that aim to protect the privacy of abortion providers and their patients, declaring the state to be a “reproducti­ve freedom state” and drawing a sharp contrast with Texas and its efforts to limit the procedure.

One law makes it a crime to film people within 100 feet (30 meters) of an abortion clinic for the purpose of intimidati­on, a law abortion rights groups believe to be the first of its kind in the country. The other law makes it easier for people on their parents’ insurance plans to keep sensitive medical informatio­n secret, including abortions.

The laws, signed by Gavin Newsom on Wednesday, intensify the political rivalry between the nation’s two most populous states. California and Texas have become bastions of their respective political ideologies, with each state carving out opposing positions on issues including healthcare, immigratio­n and the environmen­t.

That rivalry has come into sharper focus recently with a new Texas law that bans abortions once cardiac activity is detected, which is usually around six weeks and before some women know they are pregnant. The US supreme court decided to let the law take effect for now, banning most abortions in the state.

“These are dark days. I don’t think one can understate the consequent­ial nature of the moment that we are living in,” Newsom said. “It becomes of outsized importance that California assert itself.”

It is already illegal in California to post personal informatio­n about abortion providers or their patients online.

But that law has not been updated since the mid-2000s, before the proliferat­ion of smart phones with hi-tech cameras that can rapidly post to social media websites.

The new law, written by state assemblywo­man Rebecca BauerKahan, a Democrat, makes it a misdemeano­r to film someone without their consent for the purpose of intimidati­on. Offenders can be punished by up to one year in a county jail, a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

The law also requires extensive training for local law enforcemen­t agencies on how to enforce it.

“We’re upping the ante. We’re saying in California we will not accept that our reproducti­ve healthcare providers and patients be subject to threats both online and in person,” Bauer-Kahan said.

Newsom also signed a law on Wednesday making it easier for people who are still on their parents’ health plans to keep their medical treatment secret. State and federal law already provide privacy protection­s for people who are not the primary policyhold­er on a health insurance plan. But state assemblyma­n David Chiu, a Democrat from San Francisco, said patients had to request that confidenti­ality, and the law has not been consistent­ly enforced.

This new law, written by Chiu, requires insurance companies in California to automatica­lly keep certain medical procedures confidenti­al, including abortions. Chiu said the bill is important now because the federal Affordable Care Act lets people stay on their parents’ health insurance plans until age 26.

Jonathan Keller, president of the California Family Council, said the bill should have distinguis­hed between a 25-year-old on their parents’ health plan and a 12-year-old.

“Parents should be consulted before their minor children are given life-altering medical treatment,” he said. “It’s deeply concerning that the legislatur­e and the governor continue to usurp parental authority.”

 ?? Photograph: Gary Cameron/Reuters ?? Pro-choice demonstrat­ors in Washington in 2016. Gavin Newsom signed two laws to protect the privacy of abortion providers and patients.
Photograph: Gary Cameron/Reuters Pro-choice demonstrat­ors in Washington in 2016. Gavin Newsom signed two laws to protect the privacy of abortion providers and patients.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States