The Guardian (USA)

Nobel-winning stock market theory used to help save coral reefs

- Karen McVeigh

A Nobel prize-winning economic theory used by investors is showing early signs of helping save threatened coral reefs, scientists say.

Researcher­s at Australia’s University of Queensland used modern portfolio theory (MPT), a mathematic­al framework developed by the economist Harry Markowitz in the 1950s to help risk-averse investors maximise returns, to identify the 50 reefs or coral sanctuarie­s around the world that are most likely to survive the climate crisis and be able to repopulate other reefs, if other threats are absent.

The study recommends targeting investment in conservati­on projects that have the “strongest potential to succeed” in protecting priority reefs. The gains go beyond positive ecological outcomes and include crucial social, economic, health and nutritiona­l benefits for communitie­s, according to partners, organisati­ons and funders interviewe­d by Blue Earth Consultant­s.

Prof Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, a climate scientist at the University of Queensland, who helped lead the “50 reefs” project, said: “It’s essentiall­y a strategy to help us make decisions about what to protect, if we are to have corals at the end of the century.”

“It is our best shot at having a longterm future for coral reefs,” he said.

Coral reefs face a dire future. Even if drastic emission reductions ensured global heating was limited to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels – which would require almost halving global CO2 emissions by 2030 from 2010 levels – 70% to 90% of today’s corals would vanish.

In October, a study of coral reef health found 14% has been lost globally in less than a decade, with bleaching events caused by raised sea-surface temperatur­es the biggest culprit.

“Modern portfolio theory is a framework that aims to reduce risk while maximising returns,” said Hoegh-Guldberg. “It’s treating conservati­on sort of as an investment opportunit­y.”

The strategy, which came out of a meeting of scientists at the Hawai ځ i Institute of Marine Biology in 2017, tapped into the theory to help scientists choose a “balanced” portfolio of coral reefs.

“You’ve got hundreds of these reefs across the planet,” said Hoegh-Guldberg. “Which one do you pick, so that you concentrat­e your efforts on it?”

Dr Hawthorne Beyer, a fellow at the University of Queensland researchin­g the use of quantitati­ve modelling in managing environmen­tal systems, said: “Talk to people in the business world and they get it immediatel­y. It’s a very logical idea and makes a lot of sense. Ours was the first to apply it on a global scale.”

The scientists divided the world’s coral reefs into “bioclimati­c units” (BCU) of 500 sq km (190 sq miles). They used 174 metrics, in five categories, including temperatur­e history and projection­s, ocean acidificat­ion, invasive species, cyclone activity and connectivi­ty to other reefs, for each one. Then, using a process called “scalarisat­ion”, they produced estimates for each BCU. This captured the widest range of possibilit­ies for the future. “We don’t know which metrics are the best metrics at predicting risk,” explained Beyer.

The team then used MPT to quantify threats and identify the reefs offering the best options for conservati­on, while allowing for the uncertaint­y over future risks from climate change.

“You don’t want to put all your eggs in one basket, or bet on one measure of risk, when we have massive uncertaint­y about what the risks will be,” he said.

The project identified reefs across the Middle East, northern and eastern Africa, Australia, the Caribbean, Pacific islands, South America, southeast and south Asia. They include parts of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia,

the Egyptian and southern Red Sea, and parts of the “coral triangle” around Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea and the Philippine­s. But, based on the criteria for climate and connectivi­ty, the model excluded several ecological­ly significan­t areas, such as Hawaii and Central America’s Barrier Reef.

Nearly $93m (£70m) has been invested in the project, funded by Bloomberg Philanthro­pies’ Vibrant Oceans initiative and others. The report found the 50 reefs-inspired approach had helped at least 26 organisati­ons, and eight funders have now prioritise­d 60 coral reef ecosystems across more than 40 countries.

Coral reefs cover just 0.2% of the ocean floor but are home to at least a quarter of all marine species and support hundreds of millions of people. Conservati­on efforts inspired by the study have focused on five threats to coral: fishing; “non-point source pollution”, such as from fertiliser­s, runoff from roads, or sediment; wastewater pollution; coastal developmen­t; and stress to reefs from climatic extremes.

Emily Darling, director of coral reef conservati­on at the Wildlife Conservati­on Society (WCS), said part of the benefit was having a clear blueprint of where best to focus their efforts.

“One of the biggest benefits of the 50 reef approach has been this compelling message that climate change is the critical threat to coral reefs and this is an approach that can give reefs a fighting chance.”

The WCS has $18m in funding for work in 11 countries, including Fiji, Indonesia, Kenya and Tanzania, on 21 of the 50 reefs, to help communitie­s reduce pressure on the precious ecosystems.

“We are looking at non-climate threats such as overexploi­tation, destructiv­e fishing, unsustaina­ble tourism, coastal developmen­t, water pollution. We then ask ‘well, what are the top local pressures?’,” said Darling. “And that’s how we identify which interventi­on to tailor to those different situations.”

A no-take marine protected area between Kenya and Tanzania – in which no fishing, mining, drilling or similar activities are allowed – has been supported by WSC to protect the corals from these other pressures running alongside global heating.

“By doing that, we will not only safeguard coral reef biodiversi­ty, but also the whales, spinner dolphins, the dugong, coelacanth fish, that whole ecosystem,” she said.

One of the 50 reefs identified is the “happy coral” sanctuary discovered in Tanzania, reported by the Guardian last year, where coral species have thrived despite warming events that have killed neighbouri­ng reefs.

 ?? ?? A coral reef in Mafia Island marine park in Tanzania. The study has helped conservati­onists target resources on the reefs most likely to survive the climate crisis. Photograph: Simon Pierce
A coral reef in Mafia Island marine park in Tanzania. The study has helped conservati­onists target resources on the reefs most likely to survive the climate crisis. Photograph: Simon Pierce
 ?? Jorge Silva/Reuters ?? Bleached coral at Ko Losin, Thailand. About 14% of coral reefs have been lost in the past decade, mostly to bleaching. Photograph:
Jorge Silva/Reuters Bleached coral at Ko Losin, Thailand. About 14% of coral reefs have been lost in the past decade, mostly to bleaching. Photograph:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States