The Guardian (USA)

This scandal reveals a Conservati­ve party corrupted by Boris Johnson – and by Brexit

- Jonathan Freedland

Just because Boris Johnson approaches every issue thinking only of Boris Johnson does not mean we have to do the same. Even the crisis that now engulfs the prime minister, and sees his fate hang on Tory MPs’ reaction to a Sue Gray report that could come next week, is not only about him. It’s tempting to see it that way – to look for the roots of the partygate scandal in Johnson’s arrogance, entitlemen­t and narcissism – but it’s a double mistake.

As a matter of politics, it’s unwise because it would allow the Conservati­ves to ditch Johnson, pick a successor and claim to be a new government exorcised of its demon, with no need for the electorate to turn to Labour. But it’s also wrong.

For Johnson may be a loner, but he did not act alone. That’s narrowly true, in the sense that there were plenty of others who knew about or attended those rule-breaking parties and plenty more who are covering for him now. Every Conservati­ve MP who defends Johnson, every activist or donor who does not demand his resignatio­n, makes themselves complicit in the damage his actions have caused.

But it’s true in a deeper sense, too, in that the shaming events in Downing Street are a function of a Conservati­ve party that is now something else. Despite the name, that organisati­on is no longer conservati­ve in the way that was previously understood and in which it once took great pride.

Consider the two parties that Johnson himself did not attend, the ones that rocked the basement and saw a suitcase full of booze wheeled into No 10 the night before the Queen buried her husband. Forget Covid and the restrictio­ns that were broken. There was a time, not so long ago, when no Conservati­ve would have dreamed of partying in a government building on the eve of a royal funeral, even if there was no pandemic. They would have been affronted by the very idea of it.

Or take the actions of two of Johnson’s most loyal cabinet ministers as they moved to save their boss. The culture secretary, Nadine Dorries, announced the end of the licence fee, essentiall­y passing a death sentence on the BBC as we know it. Admittedly, Tory ministers have always enjoyed bashing the BBC, threatenin­g to take it down a peg, but they have not called for its effective destructio­n. Yet now a minister who calls herself a Conservati­ve can look at a world-class, century-old institutio­n that all but defines Britishnes­s, and think her mission is not to pre

serve and protect that institutio­n but to smash it into pieces.

Meanwhile, Jacob Rees-Mogg, who likes to cosplay as an Edwardian high Tory, sought to defend Johnson by attacking the elected leader of the Scottish Conservati­ve party as “a lightweigh­t”, thereby belittling the Scottish Tories who had chosen him. Once upon a time, a member of the Conservati­ve and Unionist party would have understood that the fate of the union is imperilled if Scottish voters believe Westminste­r regards them with contempt. But Rees-Mogg couldn’t care less.

The origin of all this – a Conservati­ve party happily trampling on the union, the monarchy and the cultural organisati­on that binds these islands together like no other – is not hard to fathom, though it has become impolite to mention it. It’s Brexit that transforme­d the Conservati­ve party.

Where once Tories revered tradition, Brexit filled them with revolution­ary zeal. Suddenly, and in a reversal of the teaching of the conservati­ve theorist Michael Oakeshott, they preferred the unknown to the familiar, the untried to the tried, the possible to the actual, utopian bliss to present laughter.

Brexit saw the Tories succumb to the lure of abstract nouns – Freedom! Sovereignt­y! – and supposedly creative destructio­n. One minister can’t shake the image of Dominic Cummings, minutes after the referendum result came through, leaping on a table at Vote Leave headquarte­rs, giving a speech and then punching a hole in the ceiling: “Destructiv­e fervour in his moment of triumph.”

Vandalism became a Brexit habit – hardly surprising for a project dedicated to uprooting a tangle of connection­s with our continenta­l neighbours that had grown dense and thick over half a century – and this is the

Brexit government. Like all revolution­ary endeavours, it believes that the end justifies all means, no matter the damage to those things conservati­ves once cherished. This, remember, was the movement that promised to restore parliament­ary sovereignt­y – only to suspend parliament illegally to get its way.

So we should not be too surprised that the Vote Leave Downing Street behaved the way it did. Of course it had contempt for the rules, even those it wrote itself. This was the government that boasted on the floor of the House of Commons of its willingnes­s to break internatio­nal law, if that’s what its purist Brexit required.

And naturally it bridled at restrictio­ns of any kind, even those essential to keeping our fellow citizens alive. A crude libertaria­nism always ran through Brexit, with Brussels seen as the source of pettifoggi­ng rules imposing a nannying health-and-safety culture on John Bull. No wonder Johnson,

Cummings and the others thought they were above such things. Freedom was always their rallying cry, and they were going to damn well have it, even as they were denying it to everyone else.

Besides, they saw themselves as granted a special licence that put them beyond the reach of the usual constraint­s. The Brexiters believed the referendum result had given them a super-mandate that trumped any convention­s or norms: it made them anointed instrument­s of the will of the people, who could brook no challenge. The landslide victory of 2019 reinforced that conviction. It was a toxic combinatio­n: part Marie Antoinette drinking and laughing while outside the walled garden the obedient public were dying lonely deaths, part revolution­ary politburo convinced that whatever satisfied its personal interests served the cause of the people.

We need have no illusions about the Conservati­ve party of old. We know its record. We know that Margaret Thatcher

had her own kind of revolution­ary zeal, just as we know the destructiv­e impact of David Cameron’s austerity. But there were lines it dared not cross, monarchy and the union among them. This is a different animal. Brexit transforme­d it from a conservati­ve party into a national-populist party. Its instincts now are those of Viktor Orbán, funnelling public money and jobs to ideologica­l allies, ready to burn down even the most valued institutio­ns that stand in its way. Of course, it has contempt for the people, as all populists ultimately do. It even had contempt for the Queen on the night of her greatest grief. So let’s not pretend these faults were Johnson’s alone. Brexit is the virus. Boris Johnson was only ever its most visible carrier.

Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist

 ?? SOPA Images/REX/Shuttersto­ck ?? ‘Vandalism became a Brexit habit – hardly surprising for a project dedicated to uprooting a tangle of connection­s.’ Photograph: Vuk Valcic/
SOPA Images/REX/Shuttersto­ck ‘Vandalism became a Brexit habit – hardly surprising for a project dedicated to uprooting a tangle of connection­s.’ Photograph: Vuk Valcic/

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States