The Guardian (USA)

‘They are going to be at peace’: California university returns remains of massacred Wiyot Tribe members

-

The most vulnerable members of the Wiyot Tribe were asleep the morning of 26 February 1860, when a band of white men slipped into their northern California villages under darkness and slaughtere­d them.

Many of the children, women and elderly slain in what became known as the Indian Island Massacre, had their eternal rest disturbed when their graves were dug up and their skeletons and the artifacts buried with them placed in a museum.

After nearly 70 years of separation from their tribe, the remains of at least 20 of those believed to have been killed have been returned home.

“They’re going to be at peace and at rest with our other ancestors,” Ted Hernandez, the Wiyot Tribe’s historic preservati­on officer, said this week after the repatriati­on was announced. “They’ll be able to reunite with their families.”

The return is part of an effort by some institutio­ns to do a better job complying with federal law that requires giving tribes back items looted from sacred burial sites.

Grave robbing was yet another indignity suffered by Native Americans and their descendant­s long after they were driven from their lands or killed. Hobbyists, collectors and even prominent researcher­s took part in the desecratio­n of burial sites. Skulls, bones and antiquitie­s were sold, traded, studied and displayed in museums.

Cutcha Risling Baldy, a professor of Native American studies at Humboldt State University, said returning the sacred items provides healing to tribes.

She criticized museums and universiti­es that warehouse items that objectify Native Americans and reduce them to historical objects and artifacts rather than people.

“From a spiritual perspectiv­e, from a cultural perspectiv­e or even a human perspectiv­e, it’s hard to imagine the graves of your ancestors being dug up

and then put into a museum,” Risling Baldy said. “It kind of creates a mythology around Native people that we are somehow specimens, rather than people and human beings.”

The bones of the Wiyot were recovered in 1953 after being discovered near where a jetty was constructe­d outside the city of Eureka, 225 miles (362 km) north of San Francisco, according to a notice last year in the Federal Register.

A team from University of California, Berkeley collected the remains and put them in storage with 136 artifacts buried with them, mainly beads and ornaments made from shells, an arrowhead from a broken bottle fragment, a sinker for a fishing net, bone tools and an elk tooth.

The gravesites were where the Wiyot buried some of their dead following a devastatin­g series of mass slayings at a dozen of their villages over the course of a week in 1860.

The unprovoked killings occurred in the midst of the tribe’s World Renewal Ceremony, a 10-day peaceful celebratio­n with food, dance and prayer to return balance to the Earth, Hernandez said.

After the ceremony, the tribe’s men left for the night, paddling from the island to the mainland to hunt and fish for food and gather firewood for the next day’s feast.

In the early morning, raiders arrived by canoe across the bay and stabbed, beat or hacked the victims with knives, clubs and hatchets. Several other attacks were carried out that night, and more killings occurred over the next five days, said Jerry Rohde, a Humboldt county historian.

More than 50 people were killed on the island, and as many as 500 may have been killed in the course of the week, Rohde said. An account in the New York Times put the death toll at 188.

The group of vigilantes were dubbed the “thugs” but never named publicly or held accountabl­e.

A young Bret Harte, who would go on to become one of the most popular writers of the day, wrote a scathing editorial about the bloodshed in the Northern California­n, a newspaper in the city just to the north.

“When the bodies were landed at Union, a more shocking and revolting spectacle never was exhibited to the eyes of a Christian and civilized people,” he wrote.

But that was not the popular opinion in the area, Rohde said. The Humboldt Times editor had advocated for the removal or exterminat­ion of Native people. Harte fled to San Francisco after death threats.

Some of the men bragged about the killings, and two others who were said to take part went on to be elected to the state legislatur­e, Rohde said.

The Wiyot began seeking return of their ancestors in 2016 under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriati­on Act. The act made it illegal to steal from the graves and required government institutio­ns to return items in their possession. But getting those back has not always been easy.

UCB, which held the remains at the Hearst Museum of Anthropolo­gy, denied the request, citing lack of evidence, said Tom Torma, the university’s repatriati­on coordinato­r.

Torma was aware of the case because he submitted the request as the Wiyots’ historical preservati­on officer at the time.

A 2020 state audit found the University of California had an inconsiste­nt policy on how it repatriate­d remains. While the University of California, Los Angeles had returned most eligible remains, Berkeley had returned only 20%.

UCB, which houses remains of 10,000 Native Americans, the largest collection in the US, also regularly required additional evidence that delayed returns, the audit said.

The campus has had a racial reckoning with the past in recent years, including its history with Native Americans.

Last year, the university stripped the name of Alfred Kroeber from the hall housing the anthropolo­gy department and museum. Kroeber, a pioneer in American anthropolo­gy, collected or authorized collection of Native Americans remains for research.

He was best known for taking custody of Ishi, called “last of the Yahi”, who emerged from the wilderness in 1911. The man performed as a living exhibit for museum visitors, demonstrat­ing how to make stone tools and crafts.

The university system revised its repatriati­on policy, based in part on input from tribes, last year. A new committee at UCB took a more proactive approach and determined there was enough evidence to return the Wiyot items, Torma said.

The repatriati­on was jointly made with the US army corps of engineers, which was responsibl­e for the jetty constructi­on that may have unearthed the remains.

For the Wiyot Tribe, the repatriati­on last fall came two years after the island known now as Tulawat, was returned to the tribe by the city of Eureka.

It’s now up to tribal elders to determine what to do with the remains, Hernandez said. The dead are already a part of their ceremonies. When the dancing and praying is done, the sacred fires are left burning for their forebears.

“They’ll be able to continue the ceremonies in the afterlife,” Hernandez said.

From a spiritual perspectiv­e, from a cultural perspectiv­e or even a human perspectiv­e, it’s hard to imagine the graves of your ancestors being dug up and then put into a museum

Risling Baldy

 ?? Photograph: AP ?? Wiyot brush dancers lead a ceremonial performanc­e after a deed transfer of Indian Island, the site of a massacre.
Photograph: AP Wiyot brush dancers lead a ceremonial performanc­e after a deed transfer of Indian Island, the site of a massacre.
 ?? Eureka, California. Photograph: Ben Margot/AP ?? Members of the Wiyot Tribe paddle a dugout redwood canoe across Humboldt Bay in
Eureka, California. Photograph: Ben Margot/AP Members of the Wiyot Tribe paddle a dugout redwood canoe across Humboldt Bay in

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States