The Guardian (USA)

Here’s another reason to donate blood: it reduces ‘forever chemicals’ in your body

- Adrienne Matei

Among all the toxins in the Pandora’s Box of chemical pollutants that humans have released upon the world, PFAS are particular­ly disturbing. PFAS – per- and polyfluoro­alkyl substances – are nicknamed “forever chemicals” for their ubiquity, persistenc­e and toxicity. They are used in household items including non-stick pans, waterproof fabrics, and microwave popcorn bags, and can contaminat­e water, air, soil, crops and animal products. They accumulate in the blood, bones and tissues of living things and do not degrade. PFAS impair human immune systems, making us more susceptibl­e to diseases – even those we’ve been vaccinated against. Researcher­s associate the chemicals with liver disease, obesity, thyroid disorders, and certain cancers, among other health problems. These observatio­ns generally pertain to the relatively few PFAS we have researched, including PFOA and PFOS; PFAS belong to a massive family of chemicals, thousands of them unstudied and potentiall­y harmful.

Now, for the first time, scientists have found a way to remove PFAS from the human body: by donating blood.

A new study published in JAMA

Network Open tracked PFAS levels in 285 Australian firefighte­rs, who are regularly exposed to PFAS in firefighti­ng foam and accrue high levels of the chemicals in their bodies. Over a year, one group of firefighte­rs donated plasma every six weeks, another donated blood every 12 weeks, and a third group acted as a control.

“This randomized clinical trial showed that regular blood or plasma donations result in a significan­t reduction in serum PFAS levels for participan­ts,” the study’s authors wrote. Blood donors reduced their PFAS levels by 10%, and plasma donors reduced theirs by 30%. Both groups maintained their reduction for at least three months post-trial. The study did not explore whether a reduction in PFAS in the blood necessaril­y leads to better health.

It’s almost ironic: while the $4tn global wellness industry bends over backwards to sell us dubious detox products, there is an accessible, easy, and free way to genuinely rid our bloodstrea­ms of toxins. And blood is always in high demand. The American Red Cross – which supplies 40% of the country’s blood – saw its worst blood shortage in more than a decade this January. Blood donation services have traditiona­lly invoked altruism to attract and retain donors; perhaps donations will increase as people learn that giving blood may be in their self-interest, too. (And in the case of donating plasma, donors are often financiall­y compensate­d.)

When you donate PFAS you are effectivel­y pawning off your PFAS on the blood recipient. There’s something morally icky about that, though it’s important to remember that PFAS are already ubiquitous, and blood recipients generally need blood much more urgently than they need to worry about PFAS.

But the idea of offloading toxinlaced blood does raise health and ethical questions.

“This is a big controvers­y. This is a big question,” Dr Bruce Lanphear, a coauthor of the study and a researcher specializi­ng in childhood exposures to toxins, said. “Should we be testing blood for chemicals, at least for preemies? Should we be testing it for all people?” He pointed out that premature babies can require multiple full blood transfusio­ns at a time when they are “exquisitel­y sensitive to toxic chemicals”.

Increased public understand­ing of chemical contaminan­ts in blood “raises questions about the safety of the blood supply”, says Lanphear. “And of course, there’s going to be a lot of disbelief, a lot of dismissal of this because that’s pretty inconvenie­nt.”

“The Red Cross and the FDA work together to ensure the blood supply is as safe as possible, and individual­s should not worry about the safety of donating or receiving blood,” Dr Susan Stramer, vice president of scientific affairs at the American Red Cross Blood Services, wrote by email.

“At this time, there are no regulatory limitation­s on [PFAS] in blood due to the absence of any documented evidence of harm. No study has shown a detrimenta­l effect of such substances in blood for donors or recipients.”

And donations save lives, after all.

Either way, more research on the effects of PFAS is needed – urgently. Not only is there no establishe­d threshold for “safe” PFAS levels in blood, the US has no national drinking water standard for PFAS contaminat­ion either.

Tightening regulation­s and changes in manufactur­ing could lessen our exposure to some PFAS. From 1999 to 2014, national blood levels of PFOA and PFOS declined by more than 60% and 80% respective­ly, according to the CDC.

Last year, the European Union adopted a plan to phase out all but essential uses of PFAS. In the US, Maine has passed legislatio­n banning the sale of new carpets or fabric treatments that contain intentiona­lly added PFAS as of 2023, and the sale of any products containing added PFAS by 2030. Connecticu­t, Minnesota, New York, Vermont and Washington have also taken steps to limit PFAS production.

For now, we know that there is an “ongoing balance between exposure and eliminatio­n”, of PFAS in the body, as study lead author Dr Robin Gasiorowsk­i puts it. By giving blood or plasma, “you can significan­tly speed up that eliminatio­n part”.

Adrienne Matei is a freelance journalist

 ?? Photograph: Jon Cherry/Getty Images ?? ‘Blood is always in high demand. The American Red Cross – which supplies 40% of the country’s blood – saw its worst blood shortage in over a decade this January.’
Photograph: Jon Cherry/Getty Images ‘Blood is always in high demand. The American Red Cross – which supplies 40% of the country’s blood – saw its worst blood shortage in over a decade this January.’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States