The Guardian (USA)

Why do white supremacis­ts want to kill Black people?

- Derecka Purnell

After a century of attempts by Black activists and lawmakers, President Joe Biden signed the Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act on the White House lawn, surrounded by Black politician­s, clergy, and nonprofit leaders. The new federal law makes lynching a hate crime. Representa­tive Bobby Rush, the bill’s sponsor in the House of Representa­tives, called the moment “a day of enormous consequenc­e for our nation.” But I had questions. Doubts really. Do white supremacis­ts kill Black people because we did not have a federal antilynchi­ng law? If not, then does Congress think that such a law will be a deterrent? Will federal prosecutor­s listen to Black families who say their children were lynched – or to police and coroners who call suspicious deaths “suicides”? Will this law punish civilians for violence but reward them if they join police department­s?

I sent my editor a draft of an essay questionin­g the Emmett Till AntiLynchi­ng Act. I did not have the energy to respond to the potential backlash from readers, so I sat on my criticisms, reflected on my arguments and prayed that I would be wrong. Then last week, an 18 year old white supremacis­t drove to a grocery store in Buffalo, New York and murdered 10 Black people. He published a manifesto espousing his horrific views and penciled a racial slur on his gun. Maybe he hadn’t heard about the consequenc­es listed in the Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act. Or, maybe he was willing to accept them in exchange for the lives he took. Cops arrested him like they arrested white supremacis­t shooter Dylann Roof– alive and with care.

I can only imagine the power and affirmatio­n that elders and ancestors would feel to witness a federal antilynchi­ng act finally become law in the United States, and then a couple of months later, another mass lynching happens. It pains me to picture what they endured: the bodies that Black people pulled down from ropes, the ashes they swept into sacred canisters, the swollen babies they recovered from riverbanks. It blesses me to think of their resistance, too. Black activists formed anti-lynching organizati­ons, created self-defense teams, wrote newspaper articles, boycotted white establishm­ents, ran for office, sued in courts, demanded legislatio­n, and much more. They fought white mobs, escaped, and turned potential victims into survivors.

These anti-lynching crusaders used so many different tactics to not only try to end lynching, but to try to end the kind of society where Black people could be vulnerable to the rope. Throughout US history, Black and multiracia­l social movements demanded economic, educationa­l, and medical justice to increase their agency to live the kinds of lives that they deserved. Others pushed these measures for over a 100 years because they probably believed that criminaliz­ation might deter Ku Klux Klan members, cops, and white communitie­s from murdering Black people. However, it is the duty of the

living to learn the contexts for the particular demands that activists agitated for throughout history, and determine the utility of their tactics today. People who care about justice, and those of us who are courageous enough to fight for it, must refuse to solely accept symbolic civil rights acts if we truly want to save lives.

For example, decriminal­ization activists and scholars have demonstrat­ed that calls for criminaliz­ation are not the deterrent to crime that many of us assume, especially since the US often perpetuate­s the violence that it seeks to punish. Instead, criminaliz­ation fuels surveillan­ce, policing, incarcerat­ion, poverty, and communal violence that makes society less safe for us all. Anti-criminaliz­ation organizers argue that these consequenc­es also bear down on the people that the law was theoretica­lly intended to protect. In 2015, prosecutor­s charged and a judge convicted a Black person under an anti-lynching law for attempting to protect a Black Lives Matter protestor from being arrested.

If Congress wanted to actually fight white supremacis­t violence, it could fund grants for schools to teach racial justice education. Biden signed the Emmett Till Anti-Lynching Act at a time when states are making it illegal to teach about Emmett Till. If the federal government wants to stop or at least slow down a new generation of potential white supremacis­ts, it must make vigorous, affirmativ­e efforts to openly and financiall­y support schools and community organizati­ons doing this work.

Instead of giving more money to the police department­s that often hire white supremacis­ts, the federal government could give money to organizati­ons that help white people leave white supremacis­t organizati­ons and discourage them from joining. Additional­ly, the US president should stop promising to give more money to the police after a cop kills a Black person. It is a perverse payday that affirms the actions of police to the white supremacis­t spectators who emulate cops. What’s terrifying is that the Buffalo shooter did not have to commit a mass killing; he literally could have just joined any of the thousands of police department­s and killed Black people over time. The prevalence of explicit white supremacis­ts joining law enforcemen­t agencies is so high that the country’s top law enforcemen­t agency- the FBI- has been sounding the alarm to raise awareness for more than two decades. And despite the rise in killings by police, Republican­s and Democrats largely compete to give cops more funding, credibilit­y, and protection.

Congress must also commit to ending wars and militarism. Major violent institutio­ns like prisons, police department­s, and the military are bastions for white supremacis­t recruiters who grab isolated and alienated working-class white people to build their ranks. War additional­ly inspires civilians in the US to violently attack people who descend from places where our drones drop. Or, they join rightwing militia groups like the Oathkeeper­s, Sheepdogs, and Proud Boys to cement a war-like mentality often replete with martial gear and training. Thus, it is no surprise that the Buffalo shooter dressed in the similar military fashion that many other white, male mass shooters wear during their violence.

Demilitari­zation, decriminal­ization, decarcerat­ion, and defunding the police all help to shrink the sites of armed, white supremacis­t organizing. As we continue to build an abolitioni­st society, let us never forget that the same state that has passed this antilynchi­ng legislatio­n is at the root of what conditione­d the Buffalo shooter to target Black people.

Derecka Purnell is a Guardian US columnist. She is also a social movement lawyer and writer based in Washington, DC. She is the author of Becoming Abolitioni­sts: Police, Protests, and the Pursuit of Freedom

 ?? ?? ‘ the US president should stop promising to give more money to the police after a cop kills a Black person.’ Photograph: Brendan McDermid/ Reuters
‘ the US president should stop promising to give more money to the police after a cop kills a Black person.’ Photograph: Brendan McDermid/ Reuters

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States