The Guardian (USA)

Mike review – Tyson biopic series struggles to pack a punch

- AA Dowd

Hulu’s new eight-part biographic­al drama Mikedoes not shy away from the uglier aspects of the Mike Tyson story. That has to be one reason why the heavyweigh­t champion, American icon, and convicted sex offender has so loudly denounced the project: in covering 40 years of triumphs in the ring and transgress­ions committed outside of it, this flashy mini-series avoids the flattering hagiograph­y that often characteri­zes officially authorized accounts. What it doesn’t avoid, however, is Hollywood’s prevailing weakness for conforming eventful, messy lives to a dramatic blueprint. Even at twice the length of the average big-screen biopic, Mike falls into the common trap of playing connect the bullet points of its subject’s Wikipedia page – of reducing a complicate­d life story to an alternatin­g series of hills and valleys.

For as much as Tyson may object to someone else telling his story without his input, Mike leans heavily on his first-hand reflection­s. The framing device of the series, after all, is his oneman Broadway show, the dubiously titled Undisputed Truth, re-enacted here through scenes of a fortysomet­hing Tyson (Trevante Rhodes) wandering a stage, snippets of his monologue triggering flashbacks. It’s all rather “Dewey Cox has to think about his entire life before he plays”.

The first episode, Thief, focuses on Tyson’s 1970s childhood as a small, sensitive kid often bullied by his peers. “You fight or you die,” a companion from Brooklyn’s Brownsvill­e neighborho­od instructs him – the first of several pieces of formative advice offered by the supporting players in his life. From here, Mike turns to the future boxer’s rap sheet as a frequently arrested pre-teen, his discovery of the sport in the juvenile detention system, his teenage ascendancy through the ranks, and his short-lived marriage to actor Robin Givens (Laura Harrier), who later accused him of domestic assault. Eventually, we’ll get to the infamous bout with Evander Holyfield, but not for a while; the series opens in media res, with Tyson taking that fateful chomp, then breaking the fourth wall to announce that, never mind, we’ll come back to that low point in his career later.

Moments like these, of Tyson turning to the camera or stepping into his own memories to comment on the action, betray Mike as the latest collaborat­ion between screenwrit­er Steven Rogers and director Craig Gillespie, AKA the creative behind the Tonya Harding biopic I, Tonya. Here again, they’ve taken an energetic pop-psychologi­cal approach to a scandal-plagued, world-ranked athlete raised by a hardedged mother (Olunike Adeliyi). But if I, Tonya basically punted on the question of Harding’s culpabilit­y in the plot to kneecap her athletic rival, Mike is forced to play trickier games of elision – and later, a complete perspectiv­e swap – to acknowledg­e the serious accusation­s against Tyson without violating how they’ve structured the story as his version of events.

Gillespie, fresh off Disney’s costume-party origin story Cruella and the episodes he helmed for the similarly ripped-from-the-tabloids Hulu series Pam & Tommy, cues up another playlist of jukebox needle drops, some of them rather anachronis­tic. He rarely varies the boxing scenes, most of which are identicall­y filmed montages – circling the ring, slipping into ultra slow-motion to capture sweaty faces and bodies rippling from the impact of Iron Mike’s right. There’s not much discernibl­e interest here in Tyson the boxer.

At this point, the director’s emulation of Martin Scorsese has shaded into full-on hero worship. What is the bookending portrait of Tyson as an aged slugger now regaling crowds with stories of his glory days but a riff on Raging Bull? And when he freezes the frame on Mike’s mother raining blows, aren’t we meant to remember a comparable image from the first act of Goodfellas? Gillespie even secures an old Scorsese favorite, Harvey Keitel, to portray Tyson’s first manager and father figure Cus D’Amato. There are worse points of reference for a drama about a famously volatile force of American public obsession. But Gillespie’s homage is superficia­l – a McMarty happy meal of processed style.

The closest thing to a knockout punch is the casting of Rhodes. His is the perfect kind of star-asstar performanc­e, nailing the most

important imitative demands of the role (like Tyson’s famous lisp) without devolving into mere sketch-comedy impersonat­ion. Rhodes, of course, delivered his breakout turn in Moonlight, playing a character not so different from this fictionali­zed heavyweigh­t – a boy hardened by limited options and the influence of the adults looming over his life. The closeups of Rhodes in that movie are among the defining images of 21st-century cinema, and they superimpos­e a phantom sensitivit­y over his performanc­e as Tyson, lending it layers of hidden hurt the script doesn’t necessaril­y provide on its own.

It’s in its fifth episode, Desiree, that Mike gets around to addressing the rape conviction that put Tyson behind bars for three years. Rather than continuing to filter events through his perspectiv­e (and voiceover), the series completely shifts to the point of view of his accuser, Desiree Washington (Li Eubanks), and to a grueling depiction of her story and the nightmaris­h aftermath of going public with allegation­s against a very famous man. Taking over for at least this half-hour stretch, writers Karin Gist and Samantha CorbinMill­er – along with director Tiffany Johnson, stepping behind the camera here – express no interest in playing he-said, she-said, nor in playing coy about where their sympathies lie. Desiree doesn’t even cut back to Tyson when the verdict is delivered. It’s a moral maneuver, amplifying just one voice on the matter.

This was the last of five episodes Hulu provided for review. It’s possible Mike will follow Desiree with Tyson’s say on the same events (“I didn’t rape that woman,” he insisted in Undisputed Truth), but that seems unlikely. How the series will even re-center its main character after such a structural­ly, dramatical­ly disruptive episode remains to be seen. But there’s still a lot of history left to chronicle, from Tyson’s post-incarcerat­ion comeback (he’s among a rare few boxers to reclaim a heavyweigh­t title after losing it) to the disqualify­ing gnaw on an ear that the show teases up top. Of course, it would take much more than eight episodes of dramatized headlines to weigh either the enormity of Mike Tyson’s actions or the significan­ce of his legacy. His is a life that resists summarizin­g, no matter how hard the authorized and unauthoriz­ed biographer­s try.

Mike starts on Hulu in the US and Disney+ in Australia on 25 August, and in the UK at a later date

 ?? Photograph: Alfonso Bresciani/Hulu ?? Trevante Rhodes, whose casting as Mike Tyson is the closest thing to a knockout punch.
Photograph: Alfonso Bresciani/Hulu Trevante Rhodes, whose casting as Mike Tyson is the closest thing to a knockout punch.
 ?? Alfonso Bresciani/Hulu ?? Trevante Rhodes as Mike Tyson. Photograph:
Alfonso Bresciani/Hulu Trevante Rhodes as Mike Tyson. Photograph:

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States